GANterfactual-RL: Understanding Reinforcement Learning Agents' Strategies through Visual Counterfactual Explanations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12689v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:29:43 GMT
• Title: GANterfactual-RL: Understanding Reinforcement Learning Agents' Strategies through Visual Counterfactual Explanations
• Authors: Tobias Huber, Maximilian Demmler, Silvan Mertes, Matthew L. Olson, Elisabeth Andr\'e
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel but simple method to generate counterfactual explanations for RL agents. Our method is fully model-agnostic and we demonstrate that it outperforms the only previous method in several computational metrics.
• Score: 0.7874708385247353
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Counterfactual explanations are a common tool to explain artificial intelligence models. For Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents, they answer "Why not?" or "What if?" questions by illustrating what minimal change to a state is needed such that an agent chooses a different action. Generating counterfactual explanations for RL agents with visual input is especially challenging because of their large state spaces and because their decisions are part of an overarching policy, which includes long-term decision-making. However, research focusing on counterfactual explanations, specifically for RL agents with visual input, is scarce and does not go beyond identifying defective agents. It is unclear whether counterfactual explanations are still helpful for more complex tasks like analyzing the learned strategies of different agents or choosing a fitting agent for a specific task. We propose a novel but simple method to generate counterfactual explanations for RL agents by formulating the problem as a domain transfer problem which allows the use of adversarial learning techniques like StarGAN. Our method is fully model-agnostic and we demonstrate that it outperforms the only previous method in several computational metrics. Furthermore, we show in a user study that our method performs best when analyzing which strategies different agents pursue.

Related papers

• Semifactual Explanations for Reinforcement Learning [1.5320737596132754]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a learning paradigm in which the agent learns from its environment through trial and error. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms represent the agent's policies using neural networks, making their decisions difficult to interpret. Explaining the behaviour of DRL agents is necessary to advance user trust, increase engagement, and facilitate integration with real-life tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T08:37:47Z)
• Causal State Distillation for Explainable Reinforcement Learning [16.998047658978482]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful technique for training intelligent agents, but understanding why these agents make specific decisions can be challenging. Various approaches have been explored to address this problem, with one promising avenue being reward decomposition (RD) RD is appealing as it sidesteps some of the concerns associated with other methods that attempt to rationalize an agent's behaviour in a post-hoc manner. We present an extension of RD that goes beyond sub-rewards to provide more informative explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T00:01:22Z)
• Pangu-Agent: A Fine-Tunable Generalist Agent with Structured Reasoning [50.47568731994238]
  Key method for creating Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents is Reinforcement Learning (RL) This paper presents a general framework model for integrating and learning structured reasoning into AI agents' policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T17:57:57Z)
• Redefining Counterfactual Explanations for Reinforcement Learning: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities [2.0341936392563063]
  Most explanation methods for AI are focused on developers and expert users. Counterfactual explanations offer users advice on what can be changed in the input for the output of the black-box model to change. Counterfactuals are user-friendly and provide actionable advice for achieving the desired output from the AI system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-21T09:50:53Z)
• Explaining Reinforcement Learning Policies through Counterfactual Trajectories [147.7246109100945]
  A human developer must validate that an RL agent will perform well at test-time. Our method conveys how the agent performs under distribution shifts by showing the agent's behavior across a wider trajectory distribution. In a user study, we demonstrate that our method enables users to score better than baseline methods on one of two agent validation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-29T00:52:37Z)
• Collective eXplainable AI: Explaining Cooperative Strategies and Agent Contribution in Multiagent Reinforcement Learning with Shapley Values [68.8204255655161]
  This study proposes a novel approach to explain cooperative strategies in multiagent RL using Shapley values. Results could have implications for non-discriminatory decision making, ethical and responsible AI-derived decisions or policy making under fairness constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T10:28:57Z)
• PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training [94.87393610927812]
  We present an off-policy, interactive reinforcement learning algorithm that capitalizes on the strengths of both feedback and off-policy learning. We demonstrate that our approach is capable of learning tasks of higher complexity than previously considered by human-in-the-loop methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T14:10:50Z)
• What is Going on Inside Recurrent Meta Reinforcement Learning Agents? [63.58053355357644]
  Recurrent meta reinforcement learning (meta-RL) agents are agents that employ a recurrent neural network (RNN) for the purpose of "learning a learning algorithm" We shed light on the internal working mechanisms of these agents by reformulating the meta-RL problem using the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-29T20:34:39Z)
• What Did You Think Would Happen? Explaining Agent Behaviour Through Intended Outcomes [30.056732656973637]
  We present a novel form of explanation for Reinforcement Learning, based around the notion of intended outcome. These explanations describe the outcome an agent is trying to achieve by its actions. We provide a simple proof that general methods for post-hoc explanations of this nature are impossible in traditional reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-10T12:05:08Z)
• Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learning [68.8204255655161]
  We review recent works in the direction to attain Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) In critical situations where it is essential to justify and explain the agent's behaviour, better explainability and interpretability of RL models could help gain scientific insight on the inner workings of what is still considered a black box.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T10:11:42Z)
• Self-Supervised Discovering of Interpretable Features for Reinforcement Learning [40.52278913726904]
  We propose a self-supervised interpretable framework for deep reinforcement learning. A self-supervised interpretable network (SSINet) is employed to produce fine-grained attention masks for highlighting task-relevant information. We verify and evaluate our method on several Atari 2600 games as well as Duckietown, which is a challenging self-driving car simulator environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-16T08:26:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.