Robust Field-level Likelihood-free Inference with Galaxies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.14101v2
• Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 22:38:04 GMT
• Title: Robust Field-level Likelihood-free Inference with Galaxies
• Authors: Natal\'i S. M. de Santi, Helen Shao, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, L. Raul Abramo, Romain Teyssier, Pablo Villanueva-Domingo, Yueying Ni, Daniel Angl\'es-Alc\'azar, Shy Genel, Elena Hernandez-Martinez, Ulrich P. Steinwandel, Christopher C. Lovell, Klaus Dolag, Tiago Castro, Mark Vogelsberger
• Abstract summary: We train graph neural networks to perform field-level likelihood-free inference using galaxy catalogs from state-of-the-art hydrodynamic simulations of the CAMELS project. Our models are rotational, translational, and permutation invariant and do not impose any cut on scale. We find that our models are robust to changes in astrophysics, subgrid physics, and subhalo/galaxy finder.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We train graph neural networks to perform field-level likelihood-free inference using galaxy catalogs from state-of-the-art hydrodynamic simulations of the CAMELS project. Our models are rotational, translational, and permutation invariant and do not impose any cut on scale. From galaxy catalogs that only contain $3$D positions and radial velocities of $\sim 1, 000$ galaxies in tiny $(25~h^{-1}{\rm Mpc})^3$ volumes our models can infer the value of $\Omega_{\rm m}$ with approximately $12$ % precision. More importantly, by testing the models on galaxy catalogs from thousands of hydrodynamic simulations, each having a different efficiency of supernova and AGN feedback, run with five different codes and subgrid models - IllustrisTNG, SIMBA, Astrid, Magneticum, SWIFT-EAGLE -, we find that our models are robust to changes in astrophysics, subgrid physics, and subhalo/galaxy finder. Furthermore, we test our models on $1,024$ simulations that cover a vast region in parameter space - variations in $5$ cosmological and $23$ astrophysical parameters - finding that the model extrapolates really well. Our results indicate that the key to building a robust model is the use of both galaxy positions and velocities, suggesting that the network have likely learned an underlying physical relation that does not depend on galaxy formation and is valid on scales larger than $\sim10~h^{-1}{\rm kpc}$.

Related papers

• The Optimization Landscape of SGD Across the Feature Learning Strength [102.1353410293931]
  We study the effect of scaling $gamma$ across a variety of models and datasets in the online training setting. We find that optimal online performance is often found at large $gamma$. Our findings indicate that analytical study of the large-$gamma$ limit may yield useful insights into the dynamics of representation learning in performant models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T22:30:14Z)
• Beyond Closure Models: Learning Chaotic-Systems via Physics-Informed Neural Operators [78.64101336150419]
  Predicting the long-term behavior of chaotic systems is crucial for various applications such as climate modeling. An alternative approach to such a full-resolved simulation is using a coarse grid and then correcting its errors through a temporalittext model. We propose an alternative end-to-end learning approach using a physics-informed neural operator (PINO) that overcomes this limitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T17:05:45Z)
• SimBIG: Field-level Simulation-Based Inference of Galaxy Clustering [2.3988372195566443]
  We present the first simulation-based inference ( SBI) of cosmological parameters from field-level analysis of galaxy clustering. We apply SimBIG to a subset of the BOSS CMASS galaxy sample using a convolutional neural network with weight averaging to perform massive data compression of the galaxy field. This work not only presents competitive cosmological constraints but also introduces novel methods for leveraging additional cosmological information in upcoming galaxy surveys like DESI, PFS, and Euclid.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T18:05:32Z)
• Field-level simulation-based inference with galaxy catalogs: the impact of systematic effects [0.6271213328710472]
  We train and test our models on galaxy catalogs, created from thousands of state-of-the-art hydrodynamic simulations run with different codes from the CAMELS project. Although the presence of these effects degrades the precision and accuracy of the models, the fraction of galaxy catalogs where the model performs well is over 90 %.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T18:00:07Z)
• Using Machine Learning to Determine Morphologies of $z<1$ AGN Host Galaxies in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Wide Survey [4.747578120823036]
  We present a machine-learning framework to accurately characterize morphologies of AGN host galaxies within $z1$. By first training on a large number of simulated galaxies, then fine-tuning using far fewer classified real galaxies, our framework predicts the actual morphology for $sim$ $60%-70%$ host galaxies from test sets. Our models achieve disk precision of $96%/82%/79%$ and bulge precision of $90%/90%/80%$, at thresholds corresponding to indeterminate fractions of $30%/43%/42
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T04:00:58Z)
• Robust field-level inference with dark matter halos [0.6037135999215006]
  We train graph neural networks on halo catalogues from Gadget N-body simulations to perform field-level likelihood-free inference of cosmological parameters. Our models are very robust: they can infer the value of $Omega_rm m$ and $sigma_8$ when tested using halo catalogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-14T18:00:06Z)
• Learning cosmology and clustering with cosmic graphs [0.0]
  We train deep learning models on thousands of galaxy catalogues from the state-of-the-art hydrodynamic simulations of the CAMELS project. We first show that GNNs can learn to compute the power spectrum of galaxy catalogues with a few percent accuracy. We then train GNNs to perform likelihood-free inference at the galaxy-field level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T18:00:02Z)
• Satellite galaxy abundance dependency on cosmology in Magneticum simulations [101.18253437732933]
  We build an emulator of satellite abundance based on cosmological parameters. We find that $A$ and $beta$ depend on cosmological parameters, even if weakly. We also show that satellite abundance cosmology dependency differs between full-physics (FP) simulations, dark-matter only (DMO) and non-radiative simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T18:00:02Z)
• Exploring Sparse Expert Models and Beyond [51.90860155810848]
  Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models can achieve promising results with outrageous large amount of parameters but constant computation cost. We propose a simple method called expert prototyping that splits experts into different prototypes and applies $k$ top-$1$ routing. This strategy improves the model quality but maintains constant computational costs, and our further exploration on extremely large-scale models reflects that it is more effective in training larger models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T16:12:44Z)
• DeepShadows: Separating Low Surface Brightness Galaxies from Artifacts using Deep Learning [70.80563014913676]
  We investigate the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the problem of separating low-surface-brightness galaxies from artifacts in survey images. We show that CNNs offer a very promising path in the quest to study the low-surface-brightness universe.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T22:51:08Z)
• Quantum Algorithms for Simulating the Lattice Schwinger Model [63.18141027763459]
  We give scalable, explicit digital quantum algorithms to simulate the lattice Schwinger model in both NISQ and fault-tolerant settings. In lattice units, we find a Schwinger model on $N/2$ physical sites with coupling constant $x-1/2$ and electric field cutoff $x-1/2Lambda$. We estimate observables which we cost in both the NISQ and fault-tolerant settings by assuming a simple target observable---the mean pair density.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T19:18:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.