Using Machine Learning to Determine Morphologies of $z<1$ AGN Host Galaxies in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Wide Survey

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09984v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 04:00:58 GMT
• Title: Using Machine Learning to Determine Morphologies of $z<1$ AGN Host Galaxies in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Wide Survey
• Authors: Chuan Tian, C. Megan Urry, Aritra Ghosh, Ryan Ofman, Tonima Tasnim Ananna, Connor Auge, Nico Cappelluti, Meredith C. Powell, David B. Sanders, Kevin Schawinski, Dominic Stark, Grant R. Tremblay
• Abstract summary: We present a machine-learning framework to accurately characterize morphologies of AGN host galaxies within $z1$. By first training on a large number of simulated galaxies, then fine-tuning using far fewer classified real galaxies, our framework predicts the actual morphology for $sim$ $60%-70%$ host galaxies from test sets. Our models achieve disk precision of $96%/82%/79%$ and bulge precision of $90%/90%/80%$, at thresholds corresponding to indeterminate fractions of $30%/43%/42
• Score: 4.747578120823036
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We present a machine-learning framework to accurately characterize morphologies of Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) host galaxies within $z<1$. We first use PSFGAN to decouple host galaxy light from the central point source, then we invoke the Galaxy Morphology Network (GaMorNet) to estimate whether the host galaxy is disk-dominated, bulge-dominated, or indeterminate. Using optical images from five bands of the HSC Wide Survey, we build models independently in three redshift bins: low $(0<z<0.25)$, medium $(0.25<z<0.5)$, and high $(0.5<z<1.0)$. By first training on a large number of simulated galaxies, then fine-tuning using far fewer classified real galaxies, our framework predicts the actual morphology for $\sim$ $60\%-70\%$ host galaxies from test sets, with a classification precision of $\sim$ $80\%-95\%$, depending on redshift bin. Specifically, our models achieve disk precision of $96\%/82\%/79\%$ and bulge precision of $90\%/90\%/80\%$ (for the 3 redshift bins), at thresholds corresponding to indeterminate fractions of $30\%/43\%/42\%$. The classification precision of our models has a noticeable dependency on host galaxy radius and magnitude. No strong dependency is observed on contrast ratio. Comparing classifications of real AGNs, our models agree well with traditional 2D fitting with GALFIT. The PSFGAN+GaMorNet framework does not depend on the choice of fitting functions or galaxy-related input parameters, runs orders of magnitude faster than GALFIT, and is easily generalizable via transfer learning, making it an ideal tool for studying AGN host galaxy morphology in forthcoming large imaging survey.

Related papers

• Robust Field-level Likelihood-free Inference with Galaxies [0.0]
  We train graph neural networks to perform field-level likelihood-free inference using galaxy catalogs from state-of-the-art hydrodynamic simulations of the CAMELS project. Our models are rotational, translational, and permutation invariant and do not impose any cut on scale. We find that our models are robust to changes in astrophysics, subgrid physics, and subhalo/galaxy finder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T19:26:13Z)
• Cosmology from Galaxy Redshift Surveys with PointNet [65.89809800010927]
  In cosmology, galaxy redshift surveys resemble such a permutation invariant collection of positions in space. We employ a textitPointNet-like neural network to regress the values of the cosmological parameters directly from point cloud data. Our implementation of PointNets can analyse inputs of $mathcalO(104) - mathcalO(105)$ galaxies at a time, which improves upon earlier work for this application by roughly two orders of magnitude.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-22T15:35:05Z)
• Neural Inference of Gaussian Processes for Time Series Data of Quasars [72.79083473275742]
  We introduce a new model that enables it to describe quasar spectra completely. We also introduce a new method of inference of Gaussian process parameters, which we call $textitNeural Inference$. The combination of both the CDRW model and Neural Inference significantly outperforms the baseline DRW and MLE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-17T13:01:26Z)
• Hierarchical Inference of the Lensing Convergence from Photometric Catalogs with Bayesian Graph Neural Networks [0.0]
  We introduce fluctuations on galaxy-galaxy lensing scales of $sim$1$''$ and extract random sightlines to train our BGNN. For each test set of 1,000 sightlines, the BGNN infers the individual $kappa$ posteriors, which we combine in a hierarchical Bayesian model. For a test field well sampled by the training set, the BGNN recovers the population mean of $kappa$ precisely and without bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T00:29:20Z)
• Inferring Structural Parameters of Low-Surface-Brightness-Galaxies with Uncertainty Quantification using Bayesian Neural Networks [70.80563014913676]
  We show that a Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) can be used for the inference, with uncertainty, of such parameters from simulated low-surface-brightness galaxy images. Compared to traditional profile-fitting methods, we show that the uncertainties obtained using BNNs are comparable in magnitude, well-calibrated, and the point estimates of the parameters are closer to the true values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-07T17:55:26Z)
• Learning cosmology and clustering with cosmic graphs [0.0]
  We train deep learning models on thousands of galaxy catalogues from the state-of-the-art hydrodynamic simulations of the CAMELS project. We first show that GNNs can learn to compute the power spectrum of galaxy catalogues with a few percent accuracy. We then train GNNs to perform likelihood-free inference at the galaxy-field level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T18:00:02Z)
• Satellite galaxy abundance dependency on cosmology in Magneticum simulations [101.18253437732933]
  We build an emulator of satellite abundance based on cosmological parameters. We find that $A$ and $beta$ depend on cosmological parameters, even if weakly. We also show that satellite abundance cosmology dependency differs between full-physics (FP) simulations, dark-matter only (DMO) and non-radiative simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T18:00:02Z)
• Morphological classification of astronomical images with limited labelling [0.0]
  We propose an effective semi-supervised approach for galaxy morphology classification task, based on active learning of adversarial autoencoder (AAE) model. For a binary classification problem (top level question of Galaxy Zoo 2 decision tree) we achieved accuracy 93.1% on the test part with only 0.86 millions markup actions. Our best model with additional markup accuracy of 95.5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-27T19:26:27Z)
• DeepShadows: Separating Low Surface Brightness Galaxies from Artifacts using Deep Learning [70.80563014913676]
  We investigate the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the problem of separating low-surface-brightness galaxies from artifacts in survey images. We show that CNNs offer a very promising path in the quest to study the low-surface-brightness universe.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T22:51:08Z)
• Model-Based Multi-Agent RL in Zero-Sum Markov Games with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity [67.02490430380415]
  We show that model-based MARL achieves a sample complexity of $tilde O(|S||B|(gamma)-3epsilon-2)$ for finding the Nash equilibrium (NE) value up to some $epsilon$ error. We also show that such a sample bound is minimax-optimal (up to logarithmic factors) if the algorithm is reward-agnostic, where the algorithm queries state transition samples without reward knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-15T03:25:24Z)
• Determination of the relative inclination and the viewing angle of an interacting pair of galaxies using convolutional neural networks [0.0]
  We construct Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) models to determine the relative inclination ($i$) and the viewing angle ($theta$) of interacting galaxy pairs. For a classification based on both $i$ and $theta$ values, we develop a DCNN model for a 9-class classification ($(i,theta) sim (0circ,15circ),(0circ,45circ), (0circ,90circ), (45circ, 45circ), (90circ,
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-04T11:54:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.