QBism, Where Next?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.01446v1
• Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:03:51 GMT
• Title: QBism, Where Next?
• Authors: Christopher A. Fuchs
• Abstract summary: The aim of this paper is to lay out the structure of QBism as clearly as possible for that audience. We arrive at eight tenets for QBism. We conclude with a small discussion of how the philosophy of Maurice Merleau-Ponty may be relevant to this quest.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper expresses what a breath of fresh air it has been since a few phenomenological philosophers have started to engage with QBism. In service of the newfound discussion, the aim of this exposition is to lay out the structure of QBism as clearly as possible for that audience. In the process, we arrive at eight tenets for QBism: 1) A quantum state is an agent's personal judgment. 2) A quantum measurement is an agent's action upon its external world. 3) Quantum measurement outcomes are personal to the agent performing the action. 4) The quantum formalism is normative rather than descriptive. 5) Unitary evolution too expresses an agent's degrees of belief. 6) Even probability-one assignments are judgments without ontic content. 7) Subjective certainty about what an outcome will be does not negate that unperformed measurements have no outcomes. And, 8) quantum theory is a single-user theory for each of us. We then analyze the Wigner's friend thought experiment in light of the eight tenets and indicate that a still more extended analysis is potentially QBism's surest path to uncovering an ontology under quantum theory's normative structure. We conclude with a small discussion of how the philosophy of Maurice Merleau-Ponty may be relevant to this quest.

Related papers

• Quantum Probabilities Are Objective Degrees of Epistemic Justification [0.0]
  QBism is one of the most widely discussed'subjective' interpretations of quantum mechanics. This paper takes QBism as a starting point, but allows objectivity to enter from the get-go.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T22:07:34Z)
• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• Quantum Dynamics Happens Only on Paper: QBism's Account of Decoherence [0.0]
  QBism has long recognized quantum states, POVM elements, Kraus operators, and even unitary operations to be cut from the same cloth. We present a representation theorem based on van Fraassen's reflection principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T18:39:41Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Testing quantum theory with thought experiments [4.847980206213335]
  How should one model systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory? We give a state-of-the-art overview on quantum thought experiments involving observers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T18:08:23Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Ruling out real-valued standard formalism of quantum theory [19.015836913247288]
  A quantum game has been developed to distinguish standard quantum theory from its real-number analog. We experimentally implement the quantum game based on entanglement swapping with a state-of-the-art fidelity of 0.952(1). Our results disprove the real-number formulation and establish the indispensable role of complex numbers in the standard quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T03:56:13Z)
• The view from a Wigner bubble [0.0]
  I argue that the key distinction between QBism and realist interpretations of quantum mechanics is best understood in terms of their adherence to different theories of truth. The notion of reality afforded by QBism will correspond to the invariant elements of any theory that has pragmatic value to all rational agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-12T04:21:33Z)
• QBism Is Not So Simply Dismissed [0.0]
  We evaluate the plausibility of recent criticism of QBism. We focus on the consequences of the subjective character of the quantum state, the issue of realism and the problem of the evolution of the quantum state in QBism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T11:38:07Z)
• Quantum-like modeling of the order effect in decision making: POVM viewpoint on the Wang-Busemeyer QQ-equality [77.34726150561087]
  Wang and Busemeyer invented a quantum model and approach as well as non-parametric equality (so-called QQ-equality) This note is to test the possibility to expand the Wang-Busemeyer model by considering questions which are mathematically represented by positive operator valued measures. But, we also showed that, in principle, it is possible to reduce expanded model to the original Wang-Busemeyer model by expanding the context of the questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2018-10-31T18:11:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.