Recent Advances in Software Effort Estimation using Machine Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03482v1
• Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 20:25:16 GMT
• Title: Recent Advances in Software Effort Estimation using Machine Learning
• Authors: Victor Uc-Cetina
• Abstract summary: We review the most recent machine learning approaches used to estimate software development efforts for both, non-agile and agile methodologies. We analyze the benefits of adopting an agile methodology in terms of effort estimation possibilities. We conclude with an analysis of current and future trends, regarding software effort estimation through data-driven predictive models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: An increasing number of software companies have already realized the importance of storing project-related data as valuable sources of information for training prediction models. Such kind of modeling opens the door for the implementation of tailored strategies to increase the accuracy in effort estimation of whole teams of engineers. In this article we review the most recent machine learning approaches used to estimate software development efforts for both, non-agile and agile methodologies. We analyze the benefits of adopting an agile methodology in terms of effort estimation possibilities, such as the modeling of programming patterns and misestimation patterns by individual engineers. We conclude with an analysis of current and future trends, regarding software effort estimation through data-driven predictive models.

Related papers

• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Learning-Augmented Algorithms with Explicit Predictors [67.02156211760415]
  Recent advances in algorithmic design show how to utilize predictions obtained by machine learning models from past and present data. Prior research in this context was focused on a paradigm where the predictor is pre-trained on past data and then used as a black box. In this work, we unpack the predictor and integrate the learning problem it gives rise for within the algorithmic challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T08:40:21Z)
• Leveraging AI for Enhanced Software Effort Estimation: A Comprehensive Study and Framework Proposal [2.8643479919807433]
  The study aims to improve accuracy and reliability by overcoming the limitations of traditional methods. The proposed AI-based framework holds the potential to enhance project planning and resource allocation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T08:25:41Z)
• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• PILOT: A Pre-Trained Model-Based Continual Learning Toolbox [71.63186089279218]
  This paper introduces a pre-trained model-based continual learning toolbox known as PILOT. On the one hand, PILOT implements some state-of-the-art class-incremental learning algorithms based on pre-trained models, such as L2P, DualPrompt, and CODA-Prompt. On the other hand, PILOT fits typical class-incremental learning algorithms within the context of pre-trained models to evaluate their effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T17:55:11Z)
• A review of predictive uncertainty estimation with machine learning [0.0]
  We review the topic of predictive uncertainty estimation with machine learning algorithms. We discuss the related metrics (consistent scoring functions and proper scoring rules) for assessing probabilistic predictions. The review expedites our understanding on how to develop new algorithms tailored to users' needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-17T10:36:30Z)
• Hessian-based toolbox for reliable and interpretable machine learning in physics [58.720142291102135]
  We present a toolbox for interpretability and reliability, extrapolation of the model architecture. It provides a notion of the influence of the input data on the prediction at a given test point, an estimation of the uncertainty of the model predictions, and an agnostic score for the model predictions. Our work opens the road to the systematic use of interpretability and reliability methods in ML applied to physics and, more generally, science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T16:32:59Z)
• Explainable AI Enabled Inspection of Business Process Prediction Models [2.5229940062544496]
  We present an approach that allows us to use model explanations to investigate certain reasoning applied by machine learned predictions. A novel contribution of our approach is the proposal of model inspection that leverages both the explanations generated by interpretable machine learning mechanisms and the contextual or domain knowledge extracted from event logs that record historical process execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-16T06:51:18Z)
• Forethought and Hindsight in Credit Assignment [62.05690959741223]
  We work to understand the gains and peculiarities of planning employed as forethought via forward models or as hindsight operating with backward models. We investigate the best use of models in planning, primarily focusing on the selection of states in which predictions should be (re)-evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T16:00:47Z)
• Ensemble Regression Models for Software Development Effort Estimation: A Comparative Study [0.0]
  This study determines which technique has better effort prediction accuracy and propose combined techniques that could provide better estimates. The results have indicated that the proposed ensemble models, besides delivering high efficiency in contrast to its counterparts, and produces the best responses for software project effort estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T14:40:41Z)
• Introduction to Rare-Event Predictive Modeling for Inferential Statisticians -- A Hands-On Application in the Prediction of Breakthrough Patents [0.0]
  We introduce a machine learning (ML) approach to quantitative analysis geared towards optimizing the predictive performance. We discuss the potential synergies between the two fields against the backdrop of this, at first glance, target-incompatibility. We are providing a hands-on predictive modeling introduction for a quantitative social science audience while aiming at demystifying computer science jargon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-30T13:06:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.