Uncertainty Quantification of Spatiotemporal Travel Demand with
Probabilistic Graph Neural Networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04040v2
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:53:27 GMT
- Title: Uncertainty Quantification of Spatiotemporal Travel Demand with
Probabilistic Graph Neural Networks
- Authors: Qingyi Wang, Shenhao Wang, Dingyi Zhuang, Haris Koutsopoulos, Jinhua
Zhao
- Abstract summary: Recent studies have significantly improved the prediction accuracy of travel demand using graph neural networks.
This study proposes a framework of probabilistic graph neural networks (Prob-GNN) to quantify the uncertainty of travel demand.
- Score: 10.205514928390974
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recent studies have significantly improved the prediction accuracy of travel
demand using graph neural networks. However, these studies largely ignored
uncertainty that inevitably exists in travel demand prediction. To fill this
gap, this study proposes a framework of probabilistic graph neural networks
(Prob-GNN) to quantify the spatiotemporal uncertainty of travel demand. This
Prob-GNN framework is substantiated by deterministic and probabilistic
assumptions, and empirically applied to the task of predicting the transit and
ridesharing demand in Chicago. We found that the probabilistic assumptions
(e.g. distribution tail, support) have a greater impact on uncertainty
prediction than the deterministic ones (e.g. deep modules, depth). Among the
family of Prob-GNNs, the GNNs with truncated Gaussian and Laplace distributions
achieve the highest performance in transit and ridesharing data. Even under
significant domain shifts, Prob-GNNs can predict the ridership uncertainty in a
stable manner, when the models are trained on pre-COVID data and tested across
multiple periods during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Prob-GNNs also reveal
the spatiotemporal pattern of uncertainty, which is concentrated on the
afternoon peak hours and the areas with large travel volumes. Overall, our
findings highlight the importance of incorporating randomness into deep
learning for spatiotemporal ridership prediction. Future research should
continue to investigate versatile probabilistic assumptions to capture
behavioral randomness, and further develop methods to quantify uncertainty to
build resilient cities.
Related papers
- SAUC: Sparsity-Aware Uncertainty Calibration for Spatiotemporal Prediction with Graph Neural Networks [17.994971799054213]
Existing deep learning mostly focuses on prediction, overlooking the inherent uncertainty in such prediction.
This paper introduces a novel post-hoc Sparsity-atemporalwar AUC framework, which calibrates uncertainty in both zero and non-zero values.
Specifically, our empirical experiments show a 20% reduction in the sparse traffic accident and urban crime prediction errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-13T12:20:02Z) - Uncertainty in Graph Neural Networks: A Survey [50.63474656037679]
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been extensively used in various real-world applications.
However, the predictive uncertainty of GNNs stemming from diverse sources can lead to unstable and erroneous predictions.
This survey aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the GNNs from the perspective of uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T21:54:52Z) - Performative Time-Series Forecasting [71.18553214204978]
We formalize performative time-series forecasting (PeTS) from a machine-learning perspective.
We propose a novel approach, Feature Performative-Shifting (FPS), which leverages the concept of delayed response to anticipate distribution shifts.
We conduct comprehensive experiments using multiple time-series models on COVID-19 and traffic forecasting tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T18:34:29Z) - Uncertainty Propagation in Node Classification [9.03984964980373]
We focus on measuring uncertainty of graph neural networks (GNNs) for the task of node classification.
We propose a Bayesian uncertainty propagation (BUP) method, which embeds GNNs in a Bayesian modeling framework.
We present an uncertainty oriented loss for node classification that allows the GNNs to clearly integrate predictive uncertainty in learning procedure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-03T12:18:23Z) - Uncertainty Quantification of Sparse Travel Demand Prediction with
Spatial-Temporal Graph Neural Networks [4.488583779590991]
We develop a spatial-temporal zero-inflated negative Binomial Graph Neural Network (STZINB-GNN) to quantify the uncertainty of the sparse travel demand.
It analyzes spatial and temporal correlations using diffusion and temporal convolution networks, which are then fused to parameterize the probabilistic distributions of travel demand.
The results demonstrate the superiority of STZINB-GNN over benchmark models, especially under high spatial-temporal resolutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-11T16:21:10Z) - Uncertainty estimation of pedestrian future trajectory using Bayesian
approximation [137.00426219455116]
Under dynamic traffic scenarios, planning based on deterministic predictions is not trustworthy.
The authors propose to quantify uncertainty during forecasting using approximation which deterministic approaches fail to capture.
The effect of dropout weights and long-term prediction on future state uncertainty has been studied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-04T04:23:38Z) - Probabilistic AutoRegressive Neural Networks for Accurate Long-range
Forecasting [6.295157260756792]
We introduce the Probabilistic AutoRegressive Neural Networks (PARNN)
PARNN is capable of handling complex time series data exhibiting non-stationarity, nonlinearity, non-seasonality, long-range dependence, and chaotic patterns.
We evaluate the performance of PARNN against standard statistical, machine learning, and deep learning models, including Transformers, NBeats, and DeepAR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-01T17:57:36Z) - When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for
Epidemic Forecasting [70.54920804222031]
Most existing forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions.
Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations.
We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T18:31:47Z) - Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators.
They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions.
We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z) - Learning Interpretable Deep State Space Model for Probabilistic Time
Series Forecasting [98.57851612518758]
Probabilistic time series forecasting involves estimating the distribution of future based on its history.
We propose a deep state space model for probabilistic time series forecasting whereby the non-linear emission model and transition model are parameterized by networks.
We show in experiments that our model produces accurate and sharp probabilistic forecasts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-31T06:49:33Z) - Probabilistic Neighbourhood Component Analysis: Sample Efficient
Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learning [25.8227937350516]
We show that uncertainty estimation capability of state-of-the-art BNNs and Deep Ensemble models degrades significantly when the amount of training data is small.
We propose a probabilistic generalization of the popular sample-efficient non-parametric kNN approach.
Our approach enables deep kNN to accurately quantify underlying uncertainties in its prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-18T21:36:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.