FAIR Begins at home: Implementing FAIR via the Community Data Driven Insights

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.07429v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 19:12:16 GMT
• Title: FAIR Begins at home: Implementing FAIR via the Community Data Driven Insights
• Authors: Carlos Utrilla Guerrero, Maria Vivas Romero, Marc Dolman, Michel Dumontier
• Abstract summary: We report on the experiences of the Community of Data Driven Insights (CDDI) These experiences show the complex dimensions of FAIR implementation to researchers across disciplines in a single university.
• Score: 1.5766133856827325
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Arguments for the FAIR principles have mostly been based on appeals to values. However, the work of onboarding diverse researchers to make efficient and effective implementations of FAIR requires different appeals. In our recent effort to transform the institution into a FAIR University by 2025, here we report on the experiences of the Community of Data Driven Insights (CDDI). We describe these experiences from the perspectives of a data steward in social sciences and a data scientist, both of whom have been working in parallel to provide research data management and data science support to different research groups. We initially identified 5 challenges for FAIR implementation. These perspectives show the complex dimensions of FAIR implementation to researchers across disciplines in a single university.

Related papers

• MASSW: A New Dataset and Benchmark Tasks for AI-Assisted Scientific Workflows [58.56005277371235]
  We introduce MASSW, a comprehensive text dataset on Multi-Aspect Summarization of ScientificAspects. MASSW includes more than 152,000 peer-reviewed publications from 17 leading computer science conferences spanning the past 50 years. We demonstrate the utility of MASSW through multiple novel machine-learning tasks that can be benchmarked using this new dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T15:19:09Z)
• Towards Generalizing Inferences from Trials to Target Populations [6.836945436656676]
  This paper delves into the forefront of addressing external validity challenges, encapsulating a multidisciplinary workshop held at Brown University. Experts from diverse fields including social science, medicine, public health, statistics, computer science, and education, tackled the unique obstacles each discipline faces in extrapolating experimental findings. By doing so, this paper aims to enhance the collective understanding of the generalizability and transportability of causal effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T21:49:44Z)
• Federated Learning for Generalization, Robustness, Fairness: A Survey and Benchmark [55.898771405172155]
  Federated learning has emerged as a promising paradigm for privacy-preserving collaboration among different parties. We provide a systematic overview of the important and recent developments of research on federated learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T06:32:30Z)
• Information Retrieval Meets Large Language Models: A Strategic Report from Chinese IR Community [180.28262433004113]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in text understanding, generation, and knowledge inference. LLMs and humans form a new technical paradigm that is more powerful for information seeking. To thoroughly discuss the transformative impact of LLMs on IR research, the Chinese IR community conducted a strategic workshop in April 2023.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T05:23:43Z)
• TAPS Responsibility Matrix: A tool for responsible data science by design [2.2973034509761816]
  We describe the Transparency, Accountability, Privacy, and Societal Responsibility Matrix (TAPS-RM) as framework to explore social, legal, and ethical aspects of data science projects. We map the developed model of TAPS-RM with well-known initiatives for open data. We conclude that TAPS-RM is a tool to reflect on responsibilities at a data science project level and can be used to advance responsible data science by design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T12:09:14Z)
• Engaging with Researchers and Raising Awareness of FAIR and Open Science through the FAIR+ Implementation Survey Tool (FAIRIST) [0.0]
  Six years after the seminal paper on FAIR was published, researchers still struggle to understand how to implement FAIR. The FAIR+ Implementation Survey Tool (FAIRIST) mitigates the problem by integrating research requirements with research proposals in a systematic way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-17T22:38:30Z)
• FAIR for AI: An interdisciplinary and international community building perspective [19.2239109259925]
  FAIR principles were proposed in 2016 as prerequisites for proper data management and stewardship. The FAIR principles have been re-interpreted or extended to include the software, tools, algorithms, and datasets that produce data. This report builds on the FAIR for AI Workshop held at Argonne National Laboratory on June 7, 2022.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T22:05:46Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)
• We Need to Talk About Data: The Importance of Data Readiness in Natural Language Processing [3.096615629099618]
  We argue that there is a gap between academic research in NLP and its application to problems outside academia. We propose a method for improving the communication between researchers and external stakeholders regarding the accessibility, validity, and utility of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T17:55:07Z)
• Scaling up Search Engine Audits: Practical Insights for Algorithm Auditing [68.8204255655161]
  We set up experiments for eight search engines with hundreds of virtual agents placed in different regions. We demonstrate the successful performance of our research infrastructure across multiple data collections. We conclude that virtual agents are a promising venue for monitoring the performance of algorithms across long periods of time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T15:49:58Z)
• Learnings from Frontier Development Lab and SpaceML -- AI Accelerators for NASA and ESA [57.06643156253045]
  Research with AI and ML technologies lives in a variety of settings with often asynchronous goals and timelines. We perform a case study of the Frontier Development Lab (FDL), an AI accelerator under a public-private partnership from NASA and ESA. FDL research follows principled practices that are grounded in responsible development, conduct, and dissemination of AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T21:23:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.