Inductive biases in deep learning models for weather prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.04664v2
• Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:05:20 GMT
• Title: Inductive biases in deep learning models for weather prediction
• Authors: Jannik Thuemmel, Matthias Karlbauer, Sebastian Otte, Christiane Zarfl, Georg Martius, Nicole Ludwig, Thomas Scholten, Ulrich Friedrich, Volker Wulfmeyer, Bedartha Goswami, Martin V. Butz,
• Abstract summary: We review and analyse the inductive biases of state-of-the-art deep learning-based weather prediction models. We identify the most important inductive biases and highlight potential avenues towards more efficient and probabilistic DLWP models.
• Score: 17.061163980363492
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep learning has gained immense popularity in the Earth sciences as it enables us to formulate purely data-driven models of complex Earth system processes. Deep learning-based weather prediction (DLWP) models have made significant progress in the last few years, achieving forecast skills comparable to established numerical weather prediction models with comparatively lesser computational costs. In order to train accurate, reliable, and tractable DLWP models with several millions of parameters, the model design needs to incorporate suitable inductive biases that encode structural assumptions about the data and the modelled processes. When chosen appropriately, these biases enable faster learning and better generalisation to unseen data. Although inductive biases play a crucial role in successful DLWP models, they are often not stated explicitly and their contribution to model performance remains unclear. Here, we review and analyse the inductive biases of state-of-the-art DLWP models with respect to five key design elements: data selection, learning objective, loss function, architecture, and optimisation method. We identify the most important inductive biases and highlight potential avenues towards more efficient and probabilistic DLWP models.

Related papers

• Can Kans (re)discover predictive models for Direct-Drive Laser Fusion? [11.261403205522694]
  The domain of laser fusion presents a unique and challenging predictive modeling application landscape for machine learning methods. Data-driven approaches have been successful in the past for achieving desired generalization ability and model interpretation that aligns with physics expectations. In this work, we present the use of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) as an alternative to PIL for developing a new type of data-driven predictive model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T13:48:06Z)
• Learning-based Models for Vulnerability Detection: An Extensive Study [3.1317409221921144]
  We extensively and comprehensively investigate two types of state-of-the-art learning-based approaches. We experimentally demonstrate the priority of sequence-based models and the limited abilities of both graph-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T13:01:30Z)
• A Data-Centric Perspective on Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Tabular Data [9.57464542357693]
  This paper demonstrates that model-centric evaluations are biased, as real-world modeling pipelines often require dataset-specific preprocessing and feature engineering. We select 10 relevant datasets from Kaggle competitions and implement expert-level preprocessing pipelines for each dataset. After dataset-specific feature engineering, model rankings change considerably, performance differences decrease, and the importance of model selection reduces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T09:54:39Z)
• Low-rank finetuning for LLMs: A fairness perspective [54.13240282850982]
  Low-rank approximation techniques have become the de facto standard for fine-tuning Large Language Models. This paper investigates the effectiveness of these methods in capturing the shift of fine-tuning datasets from the initial pre-trained data distribution. We show that low-rank fine-tuning inadvertently preserves undesirable biases and toxic behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T20:43:53Z)
• Analyzing and Exploring Training Recipes for Large-Scale Transformer-Based Weather Prediction [1.3194391758295114]
  We show that it is possible to attain high forecast skill even with relatively off-the-shelf architectures, simple training procedures, and moderate compute budgets. Specifically, we train a minimally modified SwinV2 transformer on ERA5 data, and find that it attains superior forecast skill when compared against IFS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T15:30:14Z)
• Addressing Bias Through Ensemble Learning and Regularized Fine-Tuning [0.2812395851874055]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive approach using multiple methods to remove bias in AI models. We train multiple models with the counter-bias of the pre-trained model through data splitting, local training, and regularized fine-tuning. We conclude our solution with knowledge distillation that results in a single unbiased neural network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T09:24:36Z)
• Measuring Causal Effects of Data Statistics on Language Model's `Factual' Predictions [59.284907093349425]
  Large amounts of training data are one of the major reasons for the high performance of state-of-the-art NLP models. We provide a language for describing how training data influences predictions, through a causal framework. Our framework bypasses the need to retrain expensive models and allows us to estimate causal effects based on observational data alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-28T17:36:24Z)
• Human Trajectory Prediction via Neural Social Physics [63.62824628085961]
  Trajectory prediction has been widely pursued in many fields, and many model-based and model-free methods have been explored. We propose a new method combining both methodologies based on a new Neural Differential Equation model. Our new model (Neural Social Physics or NSP) is a deep neural network within which we use an explicit physics model with learnable parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T12:11:18Z)
• Models, Pixels, and Rewards: Evaluating Design Trade-offs in Visual Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [109.74041512359476]
  We study a number of design decisions for the predictive model in visual MBRL algorithms. We find that a range of design decisions that are often considered crucial, such as the use of latent spaces, have little effect on task performance. We show how this phenomenon is related to exploration and how some of the lower-scoring models on standard benchmarks will perform the same as the best-performing models when trained on the same training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T18:03:21Z)
• VAE-LIME: Deep Generative Model Based Approach for Local Data-Driven Model Interpretability Applied to the Ironmaking Industry [70.10343492784465]
  It is necessary to expose to the process engineer, not solely the model predictions, but also their interpretability. Model-agnostic local interpretability solutions based on LIME have recently emerged to improve the original method. We present in this paper a novel approach, VAE-LIME, for local interpretability of data-driven models forecasting the temperature of the hot metal produced by a blast furnace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-15T07:07:07Z)
• Towards Interpretable Deep Learning Models for Knowledge Tracing [62.75876617721375]
  We propose to adopt the post-hoc method to tackle the interpretability issue for deep learning based knowledge tracing (DLKT) models. Specifically, we focus on applying the layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) method to interpret RNN-based DLKT model. Experiment results show the feasibility using the LRP method for interpreting the DLKT model's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T04:03:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.