Regulatory Markets: The Future of AI Governance
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.04914v4
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:28:15 GMT
- Title: Regulatory Markets: The Future of AI Governance
- Authors: Gillian K. Hadfield, Jack Clark
- Abstract summary: Overreliance on industry self-regulation fails to hold producers and users accountable to democratic demands.
This approach to AI regulation could overcome the limitations of both command-and-control regulation and self-regulation.
- Score: 0.7230697742559377
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Appropriately regulating artificial intelligence is an increasingly urgent
policy challenge. Legislatures and regulators lack the specialized knowledge
required to best translate public demands into legal requirements. Overreliance
on industry self-regulation fails to hold producers and users of AI systems
accountable to democratic demands. Regulatory markets, in which governments
require the targets of regulation to purchase regulatory services from a
private regulator, are proposed. This approach to AI regulation could overcome
the limitations of both command-and-control regulation and self-regulation.
Regulatory market could enable governments to establish policy priorities for
the regulation of AI, whilst relying on market forces and industry R&D efforts
to pioneer the methods of regulation that best achieve policymakers' stated
objectives.
Related papers
- Open Problems in Technical AI Governance [93.89102632003996]
Technical AI governance refers to technical analysis and tools for supporting the effective governance of AI.
This paper is intended as a resource for technical researchers or research funders looking to contribute to AI governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-20T21:13:56Z) - Generative AI Needs Adaptive Governance [0.0]
generative AI challenges the notions of governance, trust, and human agency.
This paper argues that generative AI calls for adaptive governance.
We outline actors, roles, as well as both shared and actors-specific policy activities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T23:47:14Z) - Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology [50.586585729683776]
Governments globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing innovation against safety.
A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI policy and technology.
This paper summarizes the discussions during the workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed without hindering technological progress?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-21T20:30:01Z) - The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage.
Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.
This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z) - Regulation and NLP (RegNLP): Taming Large Language Models [51.41095330188972]
We argue how NLP research can benefit from proximity to regulatory studies and adjacent fields.
We advocate for the development of a new multidisciplinary research space on regulation and NLP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T09:22:40Z) - AI Regulation in Europe: From the AI Act to Future Regulatory Challenges [3.0821115746307663]
It argues for a hybrid regulatory strategy that combines elements from both philosophies.
The paper examines the AI Act as a pioneering legislative effort to address the multifaceted challenges posed by AI.
It advocates for immediate action to create protocols for regulated access to high-performance, potentially open-source AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-06T07:52:56Z) - Both eyes open: Vigilant Incentives help Regulatory Markets improve AI
Safety [69.59465535312815]
Regulatory Markets for AI is a proposal designed with adaptability in mind.
It involves governments setting outcome-based targets for AI companies to achieve.
We warn that it is alarmingly easy to stumble on incentives which would prevent Regulatory Markets from achieving this goal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-06T14:42:05Z) - A Pragmatic Approach to Regulating Artificial Intelligence: A Technology
Regulator's Perspective [1.614803913005309]
We present a pragmatic approach for providing a technology assurance regulatory framework.
It is proposed that such regulation should not be mandated for all AI-based systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-15T16:49:29Z) - Regulating Artificial Intelligence: Proposal for a Global Solution [6.037312672659089]
We argue that AI-related challenges cannot be tackled effectively without sincere international coordination.
We propose the establishment of an international AI governance framework organized around a new AI regulatory agency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-22T09:24:07Z) - Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable
Claims [59.64274607533249]
AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable.
This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems.
We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.