Towards Mitigating ChatGPT's Negative Impact on Education: Optimizing Question Design through Bloom's Taxonomy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08176v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:01:59 GMT
• Title: Towards Mitigating ChatGPT's Negative Impact on Education: Optimizing Question Design through Bloom's Taxonomy
• Authors: Saber Elsayed
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces an evolutionary approach that aims to identify the best set of Bloom's taxonomy keywords to generate questions that these tools have low confidence in answering. The effectiveness of this approach is evaluated through a case study that uses questions from a Data Structures and Representation course being taught at the University of New South Wales in Canberra, Australia.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The popularity of generative text AI tools in answering questions has led to concerns regarding their potential negative impact on students' academic performance and the challenges that educators face in evaluating student learning. To address these concerns, this paper introduces an evolutionary approach that aims to identify the best set of Bloom's taxonomy keywords to generate questions that these tools have low confidence in answering. The effectiveness of this approach is evaluated through a case study that uses questions from a Data Structures and Representation course being taught at the University of New South Wales in Canberra, Australia. The results demonstrate that the optimization algorithm is able to find keywords from different cognitive levels to create questions that ChatGPT has low confidence in answering. This study is a step forward to offer valuable insights for educators seeking to create more effective questions that promote critical thinking among students.

Related papers

• How to Engage Your Readers? Generating Guiding Questions to Promote Active Reading [60.19226384241482]
  We introduce GuidingQ, a dataset of 10K in-text questions from textbooks and scientific articles. We explore various approaches to generate such questions using language models. We conduct a human study to understand the implication of such questions on reading comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T13:42:56Z)
• The AI Companion in Education: Analyzing the Pedagogical Potential of ChatGPT in Computer Science and Engineering [1.120999712480549]
  This study aims to comprehensively analyze the pedagogical potential of ChatGPT in CSE education. We employ a systematic approach, creating a diverse range of educational practice problems within CSE field. According to our examinations, certain question types, like conceptual knowledge queries, typically do not pose significant challenges to ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T21:42:30Z)
• Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
  We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes. We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function. Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z)
• Improving the Validity of Automatically Generated Feedback via Reinforcement Learning [50.067342343957876]
  We propose a framework for feedback generation that optimize both correctness and alignment using reinforcement learning (RL) Specifically, we use GPT-4's annotations to create preferences over feedback pairs in an augmented dataset for training via direct preference optimization (DPO)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-02T20:25:50Z)
• Covering Uncommon Ground: Gap-Focused Question Generation for Answer Assessment [75.59538732476346]
  We focus on the problem of generating such gap-focused questions (GFQs) automatically. We define the task, highlight key desired aspects of a good GFQ, and propose a model that satisfies these.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T22:21:42Z)
• UKP-SQuARE: An Interactive Tool for Teaching Question Answering [61.93372227117229]
  The exponential growth of question answering (QA) has made it an indispensable topic in any Natural Language Processing (NLP) course. We introduce UKP-SQuARE as a platform for QA education. Students can run, compare, and analyze various QA models from different perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T11:29:04Z)
• Question Personalization in an Intelligent Tutoring System [5.644357169513361]
  We show that generating versions of the questions suitable for students at different levels of subject proficiency improves student learning gains. This insight demonstrates that the linguistic realization of questions in an ITS affects the learning outcomes for students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T15:23:51Z)
• Real-Time Cognitive Evaluation of Online Learners through Automatically Generated Questions [0.0]
  The paper presents an approach to generate questions from a given video lecture automatically. The generated questions are aimed to evaluate learners' lower-level cognitive abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T05:45:56Z)
• Neural Multi-Task Learning for Teacher Question Detection in Online Classrooms [50.19997675066203]
  We build an end-to-end neural framework that automatically detects questions from teachers' audio recordings. By incorporating multi-task learning techniques, we are able to strengthen the understanding of semantic relations among different types of questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-16T02:17:04Z)
• Review-guided Helpful Answer Identification in E-commerce [38.276241153439955]
  Product-specific community question answering platforms can greatly help address the concerns of potential customers. The user-provided answers on such platforms often vary a lot in their qualities. Helpfulness votes from the community can indicate the overall quality of the answer, but they are often missing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-13T11:34:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.