End-User Development for Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic
Literature Review
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09863v2
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 06:47:30 GMT
- Title: End-User Development for Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic
Literature Review
- Authors: Andrea Esposito, Miriana Calvano, Antonio Curci, Giuseppe Desolda,
Rosa Lanzilotti, Claudia Lorusso and Antonio Piccinno
- Abstract summary: End-User Development (EUD) can allow people to create, customize, or adapt AI-based systems to their own needs.
This paper presents a literature review that aims to shed the light on the current landscape of EUD for AI systems.
- Score: 2.347942013388615
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In recent years, Artificial Intelligence has become more and more relevant in
our society. Creating AI systems is almost always the prerogative of IT and AI
experts. However, users may need to create intelligent solutions tailored to
their specific needs. In this way, AI systems can be enhanced if new approaches
are devised to allow non-technical users to be directly involved in the
definition and personalization of AI technologies. End-User Development (EUD)
can provide a solution to these problems, allowing people to create, customize,
or adapt AI-based systems to their own needs. This paper presents a systematic
literature review that aims to shed the light on the current landscape of EUD
for AI systems, i.e., how users, even without skills in AI and/or programming,
can customize the AI behavior to their needs. This study also discusses the
current challenges of EUD for AI, the potential benefits, and the future
implications of integrating EUD into the overall AI development process.
Related papers
- Human-Centric eXplainable AI in Education [0.0]
This paper explores Human-Centric eXplainable AI (HCXAI) in the educational landscape.
It emphasizes its role in enhancing learning outcomes, fostering trust among users, and ensuring transparency in AI-driven tools.
It outlines comprehensive frameworks for developing HCXAI systems that prioritize user understanding and engagement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T14:02:47Z) - Development of an Adaptive Multi-Domain Artificial Intelligence System Built using Machine Learning and Expert Systems Technologies [0.0]
An artificial general intelligence (AGI) has been an elusive goal in artificial intelligence (AI) research for some time.
An AGI would have the capability, like a human, to be exposed to a new problem domain, learn about it and then use reasoning processes to make decisions.
This paper presents a small step towards producing an AGI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T07:21:44Z) - Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems.
There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them.
Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z) - Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps.
We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches.
We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z) - Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations.
It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z) - Structured access to AI capabilities: an emerging paradigm for safe AI
deployment [0.0]
Instead of openly disseminating AI systems, developers facilitate controlled, arm's length interactions with their AI systems.
Aim is to prevent dangerous AI capabilities from being widely accessible, whilst preserving access to AI capabilities that can be used safely.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-13T19:30:16Z) - A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in
Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect.
The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Time for AI (Ethics) Maturity Model Is Now [15.870654219935972]
This paper argues that AI software is still software and needs to be approached from the software development perspective.
We wish to discuss whether the focus should be on AI ethics or, more broadly, the quality of an AI system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-29T17:37:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.