ChatGPT: More than a Weapon of Mass Deception, Ethical challenges and responses from the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11215v1
• Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 07:40:12 GMT
• Title: ChatGPT: More than a Weapon of Mass Deception, Ethical challenges and responses from the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) perspective
• Authors: Alejo Jose G. Sison, Marco Tulio Daza, Roberto Gozalo-Brizuela and Eduardo C. Garrido-Merch\'an
• Abstract summary: This article explores the ethical problems arising from the use of ChatGPT as a kind of generative AI. The main danger ChatGPT presents is the propensity to be used as a weapon of mass deception (WMD)
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This article explores the ethical problems arising from the use of ChatGPT as a kind of generative AI and suggests responses based on the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) framework. The HCAI framework is appropriate because it understands technology above all as a tool to empower, augment, and enhance human agency while referring to human wellbeing as a grand challenge, thus perfectly aligning itself with ethics, the science of human flourishing. Further, HCAI provides objectives, principles, procedures, and structures for reliable, safe, and trustworthy AI which we apply to our ChatGPT assessments. The main danger ChatGPT presents is the propensity to be used as a weapon of mass deception (WMD) and an enabler of criminal activities involving deceit. We review technical specifications to better comprehend its potentials and limitations. We then suggest both technical (watermarking, styleme, detectors, and fact-checkers) and non-technical measures (terms of use, transparency, educator considerations, HITL) to mitigate ChatGPT misuse or abuse and recommend best uses (creative writing, non-creative writing, teaching and learning). We conclude with considerations regarding the role of humans in ensuring the proper use of ChatGPT for individual and social wellbeing.

Related papers

• RogueGPT: dis-ethical tuning transforms ChatGPT4 into a Rogue AI in 158 Words [0.0]
  This paper explores how easily the default ethical guardrails of ChatGPT, using its latest customization features, can be bypassed. This malevolently altered version of ChatGPT, nicknamed "RogueGPT", responded with worrying behaviours. Our findings raise significant concerns about the model's knowledge about topics like illegal drug production, torture methods and terrorism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T18:59:43Z)
• An ethical study of generative AI from the Actor-Network Theory perspective [3.0224187843434]
  We analyze ChatGPT as a case study within the framework of Actor-Network Theory. We examine the actors and processes of translation involved in the ethical issues related to ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T02:32:19Z)
• DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT Wordsmith [63.8746084667206]
  We propose an effective ChatGPT detector named DEMASQ, which accurately identifies ChatGPT-generated content. Our method addresses two critical factors: (i) the distinct biases in text composition observed in human- and machine-generated content and (ii) the alterations made by humans to evade previous detection methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T21:13:05Z)
• Deceptive AI Ecosystems: The Case of ChatGPT [8.128368463580715]
  ChatGPT has gained popularity for its capability in generating human-like responses. This paper investigates how ChatGPT operates in the real world where societal pressures influence its development and deployment. We examine the ethical challenges stemming from ChatGPT's deceptive human-like interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T10:36:19Z)
• From Human-Centered to Social-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Assessing ChatGPT's Impact through Disruptive Events [0.0]
  The release of recent GPT models has been a watershed moment for artificial intelligence research and society at large. ChatGPT's impressive proficiency across technical and creative domains led to its widespread adoption. We argue that critiques of ChatGPT's impact have coalesced around its performance or other conventional Responsible AI evaluations relating to bias, toxicity, and 'hallucination'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T22:46:48Z)
• To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
  This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection. We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains. Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z)
• Towards Healthy AI: Large Language Models Need Therapists Too [41.86344997530743]
  We define Healthy AI to be safe, trustworthy and ethical. We present the SafeguardGPT framework that uses psychotherapy to correct for these harmful behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-02T00:39:12Z)
• On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspective [67.98821225810204]
  We evaluate the robustness of ChatGPT from the adversarial and out-of-distribution perspective. Results show consistent advantages on most adversarial and OOD classification and translation tasks. ChatGPT shows astounding performance in understanding dialogue-related texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T11:01:20Z)
• A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
  ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.