RogueGPT: dis-ethical tuning transforms ChatGPT4 into a Rogue AI in 158 Words

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15009v2
• Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:13:03 GMT
• Title: RogueGPT: dis-ethical tuning transforms ChatGPT4 into a Rogue AI in 158 Words
• Authors: Alessio Buscemi, Daniele Proverbio,
• Abstract summary: This paper explores how easily the default ethical guardrails of ChatGPT, using its latest customization features, can be bypassed. This malevolently altered version of ChatGPT, nicknamed "RogueGPT", responded with worrying behaviours. Our findings raise significant concerns about the model's knowledge about topics like illegal drug production, torture methods and terrorism.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The ethical implications and potentials for misuse of Generative Artificial Intelligence are increasingly worrying topics. This paper explores how easily the default ethical guardrails of ChatGPT, using its latest customization features, can be bypassed by simple prompts and fine-tuning, that can be effortlessly accessed by the broad public. This malevolently altered version of ChatGPT, nicknamed "RogueGPT", responded with worrying behaviours, beyond those triggered by jailbreak prompts. We conduct an empirical study of RogueGPT responses, assessing its flexibility in answering questions pertaining to what should be disallowed usage. Our findings raise significant concerns about the model's knowledge about topics like illegal drug production, torture methods and terrorism. The ease of driving ChatGPT astray, coupled with its global accessibility, highlights severe issues regarding the data quality used for training the foundational model and the implementation of ethical safeguards. We thus underline the responsibilities and dangers of user-driven modifications, and the broader effects that these may have on the design of safeguarding and ethical modules implemented by AI programmers.

Related papers

• Eagle: Ethical Dataset Given from Real Interactions [74.7319697510621]
  We create datasets extracted from real interactions between ChatGPT and users that exhibit social biases, toxicity, and immoral problems. Our experiments show that Eagle captures complementary aspects, not covered by existing datasets proposed for evaluation and mitigation of such ethical challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T03:46:02Z)
• Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Management [56.4403395100589]
  We explore ChatGPT's capabilities on 6 tasks involving the complete vulnerability management process with a large-scale dataset containing 70,346 samples. One notable example is ChatGPT's proficiency in tasks like generating titles for software bug reports. Our findings reveal the difficulties encountered by ChatGPT and shed light on promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-11T11:01:13Z)
• Comprehensive Assessment of Toxicity in ChatGPT [49.71090497696024]
  We evaluate the toxicity in ChatGPT by utilizing instruction-tuning datasets. prompts in creative writing tasks can be 2x more likely to elicit toxic responses. Certain deliberately toxic prompts, designed in earlier studies, no longer yield harmful responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T14:37:53Z)
• Critical Role of Artificially Intelligent Conversational Chatbot [0.0]
  We explore scenarios involving ChatGPT's ethical implications within academic contexts. We propose architectural solutions aimed at preventing inappropriate use and promoting responsible AI interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T14:08:07Z)
• Primacy Effect of ChatGPT [69.49920102917598]
  We study the primacy effect of ChatGPT: the tendency of selecting the labels at earlier positions as the answer. We hope that our experiments and analyses provide additional insights into building more reliable ChatGPT-based solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T00:37:28Z)
• Unveiling Security, Privacy, and Ethical Concerns of ChatGPT [6.588022305382666]
  ChatGPT uses topic modeling and reinforcement learning to generate natural responses. ChatGPT holds immense promise across various industries, such as customer service, education, mental health treatment, personal productivity, and content creation. This paper focuses on security, privacy, and ethics issues, calling for concerted efforts to ensure the development of secure and ethically sound large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T13:45:18Z)
• Deceptive AI Ecosystems: The Case of ChatGPT [8.128368463580715]
  ChatGPT has gained popularity for its capability in generating human-like responses. This paper investigates how ChatGPT operates in the real world where societal pressures influence its development and deployment. We examine the ethical challenges stemming from ChatGPT's deceptive human-like interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T10:36:19Z)
• Ethical ChatGPT: Concerns, Challenges, and Commandments [5.641321839562139]
  This paper highlights specific ethical concerns on ChatGPT and articulates key challenges when ChatGPT is used in various applications. Practical commandments of ChatGPT are also proposed that can serve as checklist guidelines for those applying ChatGPT in their applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T02:04:13Z)
• ChatGPT: More than a Weapon of Mass Deception, Ethical challenges and responses from the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) perspective [0.0]
  This article explores the ethical problems arising from the use of ChatGPT as a kind of generative AI. The main danger ChatGPT presents is the propensity to be used as a weapon of mass deception (WMD)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T07:40:12Z)
• One Small Step for Generative AI, One Giant Leap for AGI: A Complete Survey on ChatGPT in AIGC Era [95.2284704286191]
  GPT-4 (a.k.a. ChatGPT plus) is one small step for generative AI (GAI) but one giant leap for artificial general intelligence (AGI) Since its official release in November 2022, ChatGPT has quickly attracted numerous users with extensive media coverage. This work is the first to survey ChatGPT with a comprehensive review of its underlying technology, applications, and challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T06:22:09Z)
• To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
  This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection. We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains. Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.