Towards Theoretical Understanding of Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.12966v1
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:21:10 GMT
- Title: Towards Theoretical Understanding of Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- Authors: Alberto Maria Metelli, Filippo Lazzati, Marcello Restelli
- Abstract summary: Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) denotes a powerful family of algorithms for recovering a reward function justifying the behavior demonstrated by an expert agent.
In this paper, we make a step towards closing the theory gap of IRL in the case of finite-horizon problems with a generative model.
- Score: 45.3190496371625
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) denotes a powerful family of algorithms
for recovering a reward function justifying the behavior demonstrated by an
expert agent. A well-known limitation of IRL is the ambiguity in the choice of
the reward function, due to the existence of multiple rewards that explain the
observed behavior. This limitation has been recently circumvented by
formulating IRL as the problem of estimating the feasible reward set, i.e., the
region of the rewards compatible with the expert's behavior. In this paper, we
make a step towards closing the theory gap of IRL in the case of finite-horizon
problems with a generative model. We start by formally introducing the problem
of estimating the feasible reward set, the corresponding PAC requirement, and
discussing the properties of particular classes of rewards. Then, we provide
the first minimax lower bound on the sample complexity for the problem of
estimating the feasible reward set of order ${\Omega}\Bigl(
\frac{H^3SA}{\epsilon^2} \bigl( \log \bigl(\frac{1}{\delta}\bigl) + S
\bigl)\Bigl)$, being $S$ and $A$ the number of states and actions respectively,
$H$ the horizon, $\epsilon$ the desired accuracy, and $\delta$ the confidence.
We analyze the sample complexity of a uniform sampling strategy (US-IRL),
proving a matching upper bound up to logarithmic factors. Finally, we outline
several open questions in IRL and propose future research directions.
Related papers
- Partial Identifiability and Misspecification in Inverse Reinforcement Learning [64.13583792391783]
The aim of Inverse Reinforcement Learning is to infer a reward function $R$ from a policy $pi$.
This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of partial identifiability and misspecification in IRL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-24T18:35:46Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Reward-Free Exploration with General Function Approximation [69.27868448449755]
In this paper, we propose a reward-free reinforcement learning algorithm called alg.
The key idea behind our algorithm is an uncertainty-aware intrinsic reward for exploring the environment.
Experiment results show that GFA-RFE outperforms or is comparable to the performance of state-of-the-art unsupervised RL algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T01:37:18Z) - Horizon-free Reinforcement Learning in Adversarial Linear Mixture MDPs [72.40181882916089]
We show that our algorithm achieves an $tildeObig((d+log (|mathcalS|2 |mathcalA|))sqrtKbig)$ regret with full-information feedback, where $d$ is the dimension of a known feature mapping linearly parametrizing the unknown transition kernel of the MDP, $K$ is the number of episodes, $|mathcalS|$ and $|mathcalA|$ are the cardinalities of the state and action spaces
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-15T05:37:32Z) - Provably Feedback-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Active Reward
Learning [26.067411894141863]
An appropriate reward function is of paramount importance in specifying a task in reinforcement learning (RL)
Human-in-the-loop (HiL) RL allows humans to communicate complex goals to the RL agent by providing various types of feedback.
We provide an active-learning-based RL algorithm that first explores the environment without specifying a reward function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-18T12:36:09Z) - Minimax-Optimal Reward-Agnostic Exploration in Reinforcement Learning [17.239062061431646]
This paper studies reward-agnostic exploration in reinforcement learning (RL)
Consider a finite-horizon inhomogeneous decision process with $S$ states, $A$ actions, and a horizon length $H$.
Our algorithm is able to yield $varepsilon$ accuracy for arbitrarily many reward functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-14T17:46:49Z) - Fast Rates for Maximum Entropy Exploration [52.946307632704645]
We address the challenge of exploration in reinforcement learning (RL) when the agent operates in an unknown environment with sparse or no rewards.
We study the maximum entropy exploration problem two different types.
For visitation entropy, we propose a game-theoretic algorithm that has $widetildemathcalO(H3S2A/varepsilon2)$ sample complexity.
For the trajectory entropy, we propose a simple algorithm that has a sample of complexity of order $widetildemathcalO(mathrmpoly(S,
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-14T16:51:14Z) - Variance-aware robust reinforcement learning with linear function
approximation with heavy-tailed rewards [6.932056534450556]
We present two algorithms, AdaOFUL and VARA, for online sequential decision-making in the presence of heavy-tailed rewards.
AdaOFUL achieves a state-of-the-art regret bound of $widetildemathcalObig.
VarA achieves a tighter variance-aware regret bound of $widetildemathcalO(dsqrtHmathcalG*K)$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-09T22:16:28Z) - A Lower Bound for the Sample Complexity of Inverse Reinforcement
Learning [26.384010313580596]
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is the task of finding a reward function that generates a desired optimal policy for a given Markov Decision Process (MDP)
This paper develops an information-theoretic lower bound for the sample complexity of the finite state, finite action IRL problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-07T20:29:10Z) - Reward-Free Exploration for Reinforcement Learning [82.3300753751066]
We propose a new "reward-free RL" framework to isolate the challenges of exploration.
We give an efficient algorithm that conducts $tildemathcalO(S2Amathrmpoly(H)/epsilon2)$ episodes of exploration.
We also give a nearly-matching $Omega(S2AH2/epsilon2)$ lower bound, demonstrating the near-optimality of our algorithm in this setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-07T14:03:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.