Large Linguistic Models: Investigating LLMs' metalinguistic abilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00948v3
• Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 02:46:10 GMT
• Title: Large Linguistic Models: Investigating LLMs' metalinguistic abilities
• Authors: Gašper Beguš, Maksymilian Dąbkowski, Ryan Rhodes,
• Abstract summary: We show that OpenAI's o1 vastly outperforms other models on tasks involving drawing syntactic trees and phonological generalization. We speculate that OpenAI o1's unique advantage over other models may result from the model's chain-of-thought mechanism.
• Score: 1.0923877073891446
• License:
• Abstract: The performance of large language models (LLMs) has recently improved to the point where the models can perform well on many language tasks. We show here that -- for the first time -- the models can also generate valid metalinguistic analyses of language data. We outline a research program where the behavioral interpretability of LLMs on these tasks is tested via prompting. LLMs are trained primarily on text -- as such, evaluating their metalinguistic abilities improves our understanding of their general capabilities and sheds new light on theoretical models in linguistics. We show that OpenAI's o1 vastly outperforms other models on tasks involving drawing syntactic trees and phonological generalization. We speculate that OpenAI o1's unique advantage over other models may result from the model's chain-of-thought mechanism, which mimics the structure of human reasoning used in complex cognitive tasks, such as linguistic analysis.

Related papers

• Small Language Models Also Work With Small Vocabularies: Probing the Linguistic Abilities of Grapheme- and Phoneme-Based Baby Llamas [7.585433383340306]
  We show that tokenization-free, phoneme- and grapheme-based language models can achieve strong linguistic performance. Our findings suggest a promising direction for creating more linguistically plausible language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T12:36:08Z)
• L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models [102.00201523306986]
  We present L2CEval, a systematic evaluation of the language-to-code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We analyze the factors that potentially affect their performance, such as model size, pretraining data, instruction tuning, and different prompting methods. In addition to assessing model performance, we measure confidence calibration for the models and conduct human evaluations of the output programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:57:00Z)
• SINC: Self-Supervised In-Context Learning for Vision-Language Tasks [64.44336003123102]
  We propose a framework to enable in-context learning in large language models. A meta-model can learn on self-supervised prompts consisting of tailored demonstrations. Experiments show that SINC outperforms gradient-based methods in various vision-language tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T08:33:08Z)
• Large Language Models Are Not Strong Abstract Reasoners [12.354660792999269]
  Large Language Models have shown tremendous performance on a variety of natural language processing tasks. It is unclear whether LLMs can achieve human-like cognitive capabilities or whether these models are still fundamentally circumscribed. We introduce a new benchmark for evaluating language models beyond memorization on abstract reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T04:50:29Z)
• Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate [95.10641301155232]
  We present a complementary approach to improve language responses where multiple language model instances propose and debate their individual responses and reasoning processes over multiple rounds to arrive at a common final answer. Our findings indicate that this approach significantly enhances mathematical and strategic reasoning across a number of tasks. Our approach may be directly applied to existing black-box models and uses identical procedure and prompts for all tasks we investigate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:55:11Z)
• A Survey of Large Language Models [81.06947636926638]
  Language modeling has been widely studied for language understanding and generation in the past two decades. Recently, pre-trained language models (PLMs) have been proposed by pre-training Transformer models over large-scale corpora. To discriminate the difference in parameter scale, the research community has coined the term large language models (LLM) for the PLMs of significant size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T17:28:46Z)
• An Overview on Language Models: Recent Developments and Outlook [32.528770408502396]
  Conventional language models (CLMs) aim to predict the probability of linguistic sequences in a causal manner. Pre-trained language models (PLMs) cover broader concepts and can be used in both causal sequential modeling and fine-tuning for downstream applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-10T07:55:00Z)
• Competence-Based Analysis of Language Models [21.43498764977656]
  CALM (Competence-based Analysis of Language Models) is designed to investigate LLM competence in the context of specific tasks. We develop a new approach for performing causal probing interventions using gradient-based adversarial attacks. We carry out a case study of CALM using these interventions to analyze and compare LLM competence across a variety of lexical inference tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T08:53:36Z)
• LERT: A Linguistically-motivated Pre-trained Language Model [67.65651497173998]
  We propose LERT, a pre-trained language model that is trained on three types of linguistic features along with the original pre-training task. We carried out extensive experiments on ten Chinese NLU tasks, and the experimental results show that LERT could bring significant improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T05:09:16Z)
• Shortcut Learning of Large Language Models in Natural Language Understanding [119.45683008451698]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance on a series of natural language understanding tasks. They might rely on dataset bias and artifacts as shortcuts for prediction. This has significantly affected their generalizability and adversarial robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T03:51:39Z)
• A Survey of Knowledge Enhanced Pre-trained Models [28.160826399552462]
  We refer to pre-trained language models with knowledge injection as knowledge-enhanced pre-trained language models (KEPLMs) These models demonstrate deep understanding and logical reasoning and introduce interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-01T08:51:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.