Assessing the potential of LLM-assisted annotation for corpus-based pragmatics and discourse analysis: The case of apology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08339v5
• Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 09:56:59 GMT
• Title: Assessing the potential of LLM-assisted annotation for corpus-based pragmatics and discourse analysis: The case of apology
• Authors: Danni Yu, Luyang Li, Hang Su, Matteo Fuoli,
• Abstract summary: This study explores the possibility of using large language models (LLMs) to automate pragma-discursive corpus annotation.<n>We find that GPT-4 outperformed GPT-3.5, with accuracy approaching that of a human coder.
• Score: 9.941695905504282
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Certain forms of linguistic annotation, like part of speech and semantic tagging, can be automated with high accuracy. However, manual annotation is still necessary for complex pragmatic and discursive features that lack a direct mapping to lexical forms. This manual process is time-consuming and error-prone, limiting the scalability of function-to-form approaches in corpus linguistics. To address this, our study explores the possibility of using large language models (LLMs) to automate pragma-discursive corpus annotation. We compare GPT-3.5 (the model behind the free-to-use version of ChatGPT), GPT-4 (the model underpinning the precise mode of Bing chatbot), and a human coder in annotating apology components in English based on the local grammar framework. We find that GPT-4 outperformed GPT-3.5, with accuracy approaching that of a human coder. These results suggest that LLMs can be successfully deployed to aid pragma-discursive corpus annotation, making the process more efficient, scalable and accessible.

Related papers

• Type-Constrained Code Generation with Language Models [51.03439021895432]
  Large language models (LLMs) produce uncompilable output because their next-token inference procedure does not model formal aspects of code. We introduce a type-constrained decoding approach that leverages type systems to guide code generation. Our approach reduces compilation errors by more than half and increases functional correctness in code synthesis, translation, and repair tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T15:03:00Z)
• Detecting Document-level Paraphrased Machine Generated Content: Mimicking Human Writing Style and Involving Discourse Features [57.34477506004105]
  Machine-generated content poses challenges such as academic plagiarism and the spread of misinformation. We introduce novel methodologies and datasets to overcome these challenges. We propose MhBART, an encoder-decoder model designed to emulate human writing style. We also propose DTransformer, a model that integrates discourse analysis through PDTB preprocessing to encode structural features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T08:47:41Z)
• GPT Assisted Annotation of Rhetorical and Linguistic Features for Interpretable Propaganda Technique Detection in News Text [1.2699007098398802]
  This study codifies 22 rhetorical and linguistic features identified in literature related to the language of persuasion. RhetAnn, a web application, was specifically designed to minimize an otherwise considerable mental effort. A small set of annotated data was used to fine-tune GPT-3.5, a generative large language model (LLM), to annotate the remaining data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T15:15:39Z)
• Towards Automating Text Annotation: A Case Study on Semantic Proximity Annotation using GPT-4 [4.40960504549418]
  This paper reuses human annotation guidelines along with some annotated data to design automatic prompts. We implement the prompting strategies into an open-source text annotation tool, enabling easy online use via the OpenAI API.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T19:16:44Z)
• Automatic Annotation of Grammaticality in Child-Caregiver Conversations [7.493963534076502]
  This work contributes to the growing literature on applying state-of-the-art NLP methods to help study child language acquisition at scale. We propose a coding scheme for context-dependent grammaticality and annotate more than 4,000 utterances from a large corpus of transcribed conversations. Our results show that fine-tuned Transformer-based models perform best, achieving human inter-annotation agreement levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T08:00:05Z)
• A General and Flexible Multi-concept Parsing Framework for Multilingual Semantic Matching [60.51839859852572]
  We propose to resolve the text into multi concepts for multilingual semantic matching to liberate the model from the reliance on NER models. We conduct comprehensive experiments on English datasets QQP and MRPC, and Chinese dataset Medical-SM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T13:55:16Z)
• AmadeusGPT: a natural language interface for interactive animal behavioral analysis [65.55906175884748]
  We introduce AmadeusGPT: a natural language interface that turns natural language descriptions of behaviors into machine-executable code. We show we can produce state-of-the-art performance on the MABE 2022 behavior challenge tasks. AmadeusGPT presents a novel way to merge deep biological knowledge, large-language models, and core computer vision modules into a more naturally intelligent system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T19:15:17Z)
• Towards Computationally Verifiable Semantic Grounding for Language Models [18.887697890538455]
  The paper conceptualizes the LM as a conditional model generating text given a desired semantic message formalized as a set of entity-relationship triples. It embeds the LM in an auto-encoder by feeding its output to a semantic fluency whose output is in the same representation domain as the input message. We show that our proposed approaches significantly improve on the greedy search baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T17:35:52Z)
• Prompting Language Models for Linguistic Structure [73.11488464916668]
  We present a structured prompting approach for linguistic structured prediction tasks. We evaluate this approach on part-of-speech tagging, named entity recognition, and sentence chunking. We find that while PLMs contain significant prior knowledge of task labels due to task leakage into the pretraining corpus, structured prompting can also retrieve linguistic structure with arbitrary labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T01:13:39Z)
• Bidirectional Language Models Are Also Few-shot Learners [54.37445173284831]
  We present SAP (Sequential Autoregressive Prompting), a technique that enables the prompting of bidirectional models. We show SAP is effective on question answering and summarization. For the first time, our results demonstrate prompt-based learning is an emergent property of a broader class of language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-29T01:35:57Z)
• Few-Shot Semantic Parsing with Language Models Trained On Code [52.23355024995237]
  We find that Codex performs better at semantic parsing than equivalent GPT-3 models. We find that unlike GPT-3, Codex performs similarly when targeting meaning representations directly, perhaps as meaning representations used in semantic parsing are structured similar to code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T08:34:06Z)
• On The Ingredients of an Effective Zero-shot Semantic Parser [95.01623036661468]
  We analyze zero-shot learning by paraphrasing training examples of canonical utterances and programs from a grammar. We propose bridging these gaps using improved grammars, stronger paraphrasers, and efficient learning methods. Our model achieves strong performance on two semantic parsing benchmarks (Scholar, Geo) with zero labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T21:41:16Z)
• Constrained Language Models Yield Few-Shot Semantic Parsers [73.50960967598654]
  We explore the use of large pretrained language models as few-shot semantics. The goal in semantic parsing is to generate a structured meaning representation given a natural language input. We use language models to paraphrase inputs into a controlled sublanguage resembling English that can be automatically mapped to a target meaning representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T08:13:06Z)
• Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigm [0.0]
  We discuss methods of prompt programming, emphasizing the usefulness of considering prompts through the lens of natural language. We introduce the idea of a metaprompt that seeds the model to generate its own natural language prompts for a range of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-15T05:27:55Z)
• Semantic Parsing with Less Prior and More Monolingual Data [12.715221084359085]
  This work investigates whether a generic transformer-based seq2seq model can achieve competitive performance with minimal semantic-parsing specific inductive bias design. By exploiting a relatively large monolingual corpus of the target programming language, which is cheap to mine from the web, unlike a parallel corpus, we achieved 80.75% exact match accuracy on Django and 32.57 BLEU score on CoNaLa, both are SOTA to the best of our knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-01T16:02:38Z)
• Fast and Robust Unsupervised Contextual Biasing for Speech Recognition [16.557586847398778]
  We propose an alternative approach that does not entail explicit contextual language model. We derive the bias score for every word in the system vocabulary from the training corpus. We show significant improvement in recognition accuracy when the relevant context is available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T17:29:59Z)
• Template Guided Text Generation for Task-Oriented Dialogue [9.690158790639131]
  Virtual assistants such as Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, and Apple Siri enable users to interact with a large number of services and APIs on the web using natural language. In this work, we investigate two methods for Natural Language Generation using a single domain-independent model across a large number of APIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T17:51:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.