Bayesian approach to Gaussian process regression with uncertain inputs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11586v2
• Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 11:41:15 GMT
• Title: Bayesian approach to Gaussian process regression with uncertain inputs
• Authors: Dongwei Ye, Mengwu Guo
• Abstract summary: In this work, we propose a Bayesian method that integrates the variability of input data into Gaussian process regression. The effectiveness of this new regression technique is demonstrated through several numerical examples.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Conventional Gaussian process regression exclusively assumes the existence of noise in the output data of model observations. In many scientific and engineering applications, however, the input locations of observational data may also be compromised with uncertainties owing to modeling assumptions, measurement errors, etc. In this work, we propose a Bayesian method that integrates the variability of input data into Gaussian process regression. Considering two types of observables -- noise-corrupted outputs with fixed inputs and those with prior-distribution-defined uncertain inputs, a posterior distribution is estimated via a Bayesian framework to infer the uncertain data locations. Thereafter, such quantified uncertainties of inputs are incorporated into Gaussian process predictions by means of marginalization. The effectiveness of this new regression technique is demonstrated through several numerical examples, in which a consistently good performance of generalization is observed, while a substantial reduction in the predictive uncertainties is achieved by the Bayesian inference of uncertain inputs.

Related papers

• Progression: an extrapolation principle for regression [0.0]
  We propose a novel statistical extrapolation principle. It assumes a simple relationship between predictors and the response at the boundary of the training predictor samples. Our semi-parametric method, progression, leverages this extrapolation principle and offers guarantees on the approximation error beyond the training data range.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:29:51Z)
• Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
  We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point. Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z)
• Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
  We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity. The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z)
• Adversarial robustness of amortized Bayesian inference [3.308743964406687]
  Amortized Bayesian inference is to initially invest computational cost in training an inference network on simulated data. We show that almost unrecognizable, targeted perturbations of the observations can lead to drastic changes in the predicted posterior and highly unrealistic posterior predictive samples. We propose a computationally efficient regularization scheme based on penalizing the Fisher information of the conditional density estimator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:18:45Z)
• Robust Gaussian Process Regression with Huber Likelihood [2.7184224088243365]
  We propose a robust process model in the Gaussian process framework with the likelihood of observed data expressed as the Huber probability distribution. The proposed model employs weights based on projection statistics to scale residuals and bound the influence of vertical outliers and bad leverage points on the latent functions estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-19T02:59:33Z)
• Posterior and Computational Uncertainty in Gaussian Processes [52.26904059556759]
  Gaussian processes scale prohibitively with the size of the dataset. Many approximation methods have been developed, which inevitably introduce approximation error. This additional source of uncertainty, due to limited computation, is entirely ignored when using the approximate posterior. We develop a new class of methods that provides consistent estimation of the combined uncertainty arising from both the finite number of data observed and the finite amount of computation expended.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-30T22:16:25Z)
• CovarianceNet: Conditional Generative Model for Correct Covariance Prediction in Human Motion Prediction [71.31516599226606]
  We present a new method to correctly predict the uncertainty associated with the predicted distribution of future trajectories. Our approach, CovariaceNet, is based on a Conditional Generative Model with Gaussian latent variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T09:38:24Z)
• Aleatoric uncertainty for Errors-in-Variables models in deep regression [0.48733623015338234]
  We show how the concept of Errors-in-Variables can be used in Bayesian deep regression. We discuss the approach along various simulated and real examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-19T12:37:02Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Learning to Predict Error for MRI Reconstruction [67.76632988696943]
  We demonstrate that predictive uncertainty estimated by the current methods does not highly correlate with prediction error. We propose a novel method that estimates the target labels and magnitude of the prediction error in two steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T15:55:32Z)
• Robust Gaussian Process Regression with a Bias Model [0.6850683267295248]
  Most existing approaches replace an outlier-prone Gaussian likelihood with a non-Gaussian likelihood induced from a heavy tail distribution. The proposed approach models an outlier as a noisy and biased observation of an unknown regression function. Conditioned on the bias estimates, the robust GP regression can be reduced to a standard GP regression problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-14T06:21:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.