Bias Beyond English: Counterfactual Tests for Bias in Sentiment Analysis in Four Languages

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11673v1
• Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 13:38:53 GMT
• Title: Bias Beyond English: Counterfactual Tests for Bias in Sentiment Analysis in Four Languages
• Authors: Seraphina Goldfarb-Tarrant, Adam Lopez, Roi Blanco, Diego Marcheggiani
• Abstract summary: Sentiment analysis systems are used in many products and hundreds of languages. Gender and racial biases are well-studied in English SA systems, but understudied in other languages. We build a counterfactual evaluation corpus for gender and racial/migrant bias in four languages.
• Score: 13.694445396757162
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Sentiment analysis (SA) systems are used in many products and hundreds of languages. Gender and racial biases are well-studied in English SA systems, but understudied in other languages, with few resources for such studies. To remedy this, we build a counterfactual evaluation corpus for gender and racial/migrant bias in four languages. We demonstrate its usefulness by answering a simple but important question that an engineer might need to answer when deploying a system: What biases do systems import from pre-trained models when compared to a baseline with no pre-training? Our evaluation corpus, by virtue of being counterfactual, not only reveals which models have less bias, but also pinpoints changes in model bias behaviour, which enables more targeted mitigation strategies. We release our code and evaluation corpora to facilitate future research.

Related papers

• GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language Models [83.30078426829627]
  Large language models (LLMs) have gained popularity and are being widely adopted by a large user community. The existing evaluation methods have many constraints, and their results exhibit a limited degree of interpretability. We propose a bias evaluation framework named GPTBIAS that leverages the high performance of LLMs to assess bias in models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T12:02:14Z)
• On Evaluating and Mitigating Gender Biases in Multilingual Settings [5.248564173595024]
  We investigate some of the challenges with evaluating and mitigating biases in multilingual settings. We first create a benchmark for evaluating gender biases in pre-trained masked language models. We extend various debiasing methods to work beyond English and evaluate their effectiveness for SOTA massively multilingual models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T06:23:04Z)
• Gender Biases in Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Image Captioning [87.15170977240643]
  We conduct a systematic study of gender biases in model-based evaluation metrics for image captioning tasks. We demonstrate the negative consequences of using these biased metrics, including the inability to differentiate between biased and unbiased generations. We present a simple and effective way to mitigate the metric bias without hurting the correlations with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T04:27:40Z)
• Cross-lingual Transfer Can Worsen Bias in Sentiment Analysis [12.767209085664247]
  We study whether gender or racial biases are imported when using cross-lingual transfer. We find that systems using cross-lingual transfer usually become more biased than their monolingual counterparts. We also find racial biases to be much more prevalent than gender biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T04:37:49Z)
• An Analysis of Social Biases Present in BERT Variants Across Multiple Languages [0.0]
  We investigate the bias present in monolingual BERT models across a diverse set of languages. We propose a template-based method to measure any kind of bias, based on sentence pseudo-likelihood. We conclude that current methods of probing for bias are highly language-dependent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T23:38:08Z)
• Bias at a Second Glance: A Deep Dive into Bias for German Educational Peer-Review Data Modeling [10.080007569933331]
  We analyze bias across text and through multiple architectures on a corpus of 9,165 German peer- reviews over five years. Our collected corpus does not reveal many biases in the co-occurrence analysis or in the GloVe embeddings. Pre-trained German language models find substantial conceptual, racial, and gender bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T13:08:16Z)
• Efficient Gender Debiasing of Pre-trained Indic Language Models [0.0]
  The gender bias present in the data on which language models are pre-trained gets reflected in the systems that use these models. In our paper, we measure gender bias associated with occupations in Hindi language models. Our results reflect that the bias is reduced post-introduction of our proposed mitigation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T09:15:58Z)
• Few-shot Instruction Prompts for Pretrained Language Models to Detect Social Biases [55.45617404586874]
  We propose a few-shot instruction-based method for prompting pre-trained language models (LMs) We show that large LMs can detect different types of fine-grained biases with similar and sometimes superior accuracy to fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T04:19:52Z)
• Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models [107.82654101403264]
  Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) can be potentially dangerous in manifesting undesirable representational biases. We propose steps towards mitigating social biases during text generation. Our empirical results and human evaluation demonstrate effectiveness in mitigating bias while retaining crucial contextual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T17:52:43Z)
• UnQovering Stereotyping Biases via Underspecified Questions [68.81749777034409]
  We present UNQOVER, a framework to probe and quantify biases through underspecified questions. We show that a naive use of model scores can lead to incorrect bias estimates due to two forms of reasoning errors. We use this metric to analyze four important classes of stereotypes: gender, nationality, ethnicity, and religion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T01:49:52Z)
• Gender Bias in Multilingual Embeddings and Cross-Lingual Transfer [101.58431011820755]
  We study gender bias in multilingual embeddings and how it affects transfer learning for NLP applications. We create a multilingual dataset for bias analysis and propose several ways for quantifying bias in multilingual representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-02T04:34:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.