On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.13661v2
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 20:45:39 GMT
- Title: On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models
- Authors: Yikang Pan, Liangming Pan, Wenhu Chen, Preslav Nakov, Min-Yen Kan,
William Yang Wang
- Abstract summary: We investigate the potential misuse of modern Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating credible-sounding misinformation.
Our study reveals that LLMs can act as effective misinformation generators, leading to a significant degradation in the performance of Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) systems.
- Score: 127.1107824751703
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In this paper, we comprehensively investigate the potential misuse of modern
Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating credible-sounding misinformation
and its subsequent impact on information-intensive applications, particularly
Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) systems. We establish a threat model and
simulate potential misuse scenarios, both unintentional and intentional, to
assess the extent to which LLMs can be utilized to produce misinformation. Our
study reveals that LLMs can act as effective misinformation generators, leading
to a significant degradation in the performance of ODQA systems. To mitigate
the harm caused by LLM-generated misinformation, we explore three defense
strategies: prompting, misinformation detection, and majority voting. While
initial results show promising trends for these defensive strategies, much more
work needs to be done to address the challenge of misinformation pollution. Our
work highlights the need for further research and interdisciplinary
collaboration to address LLM-generated misinformation and to promote
responsible use of LLMs.
Related papers
- Can LLMs be Fooled? Investigating Vulnerabilities in LLMs [4.927763944523323]
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has garnered significant popularity and wielded immense power across various domains within Natural Language Processing (NLP)
This paper will synthesize the findings from each vulnerability section and propose new directions of research and development.
By understanding the focal points of current vulnerabilities, we can better anticipate and mitigate future risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-30T04:08:00Z) - A Survey of Attacks on Large Vision-Language Models: Resources, Advances, and Future Trends [78.3201480023907]
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of multimodal understanding and reasoning tasks.
The vulnerability of LVLMs is relatively underexplored, posing potential security risks in daily usage.
In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the various forms of existing LVLM attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-10T06:57:58Z) - Small Models, Big Insights: Leveraging Slim Proxy Models To Decide When and What to Retrieve for LLMs [60.40396361115776]
This paper introduces a novel collaborative approach, namely SlimPLM, that detects missing knowledge in large language models (LLMs) with a slim proxy model.
We employ a proxy model which has far fewer parameters, and take its answers as answers.
Heuristic answers are then utilized to predict the knowledge required to answer the user question, as well as the known and unknown knowledge within the LLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T11:11:08Z) - LEMMA: Towards LVLM-Enhanced Multimodal Misinformation Detection with External Knowledge Augmentation [58.524237916836164]
We propose LEMMA: LVLM-Enhanced Multimodal Misinformation Detection with External Knowledge Augmentation.
Our method improves the accuracy over the top baseline LVLM by 7% and 13% on Twitter and Fakeddit datasets respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T08:32:27Z) - Exploring the Adversarial Capabilities of Large Language Models [25.7847594292453]
Large language models (LLMs) can craft adversarial examples out of benign samples to fool existing safe rails.
Our experiments, which focus on hate speech detection, reveal that LLMs succeed in finding adversarial perturbations, effectively undermining hate speech detection systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-14T12:28:38Z) - Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [85.92660644100582]
We explore machine unlearning in the domain of large language models (LLMs)
This initiative aims to eliminate undesirable data influence (e.g., sensitive or illegal information) and the associated model capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T20:51:58Z) - Breaking the Silence: the Threats of Using LLMs in Software Engineering [12.368546216271382]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained considerable traction within the Software Engineering (SE) community.
This paper initiates an open discussion on potential threats to the validity of LLM-based research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-13T11:02:19Z) - Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and
Domain-Specificity [61.54815512469125]
This survey addresses the crucial issue of factuality in Large Language Models (LLMs)
As LLMs find applications across diverse domains, the reliability and accuracy of their outputs become vital.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T14:18:03Z) - Causal Reasoning and Large Language Models: Opening a New Frontier for Causality [29.433401785920065]
Large language models (LLMs) can generate causal arguments with high probability.
LLMs may be used by human domain experts to save effort in setting up a causal analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-28T19:00:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.