Can LLMs be Fooled? Investigating Vulnerabilities in LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20529v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 04:08:00 GMT
- Title: Can LLMs be Fooled? Investigating Vulnerabilities in LLMs
- Authors: Sara Abdali, Jia He, CJ Barberan, Richard Anarfi,
- Abstract summary: The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has garnered significant popularity and wielded immense power across various domains within Natural Language Processing (NLP)
This paper will synthesize the findings from each vulnerability section and propose new directions of research and development.
By understanding the focal points of current vulnerabilities, we can better anticipate and mitigate future risks.
- Score: 4.927763944523323
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has garnered significant popularity and wielded immense power across various domains within Natural Language Processing (NLP). While their capabilities are undeniably impressive, it is crucial to identify and scrutinize their vulnerabilities especially when those vulnerabilities can have costly consequences. One such LLM, trained to provide a concise summarization from medical documents could unequivocally leak personal patient data when prompted surreptitiously. This is just one of many unfortunate examples that have been unveiled and further research is necessary to comprehend the underlying reasons behind such vulnerabilities. In this study, we delve into multiple sections of vulnerabilities which are model-based, training-time, inference-time vulnerabilities, and discuss mitigation strategies including "Model Editing" which aims at modifying LLMs behavior, and "Chroma Teaming" which incorporates synergy of multiple teaming strategies to enhance LLMs' resilience. This paper will synthesize the findings from each vulnerability section and propose new directions of research and development. By understanding the focal points of current vulnerabilities, we can better anticipate and mitigate future risks, paving the road for more robust and secure LLMs.
Related papers
- Emerging Security Challenges of Large Language Models [6.151633954305939]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved record adoption in a short period of time across many different sectors.
They are open-ended models trained on diverse data without being tailored for specific downstream tasks.
Traditional Machine Learning (ML) models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-23T14:36:37Z) - Look Before You Leap: Enhancing Attention and Vigilance Regarding Harmful Content with GuidelineLLM [53.79753074854936]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly vulnerable to emerging jailbreak attacks.
This vulnerability poses significant risks to the real-world applications.
We propose a novel defensive paradigm called GuidelineLLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-10T12:42:33Z) - Detecting and Understanding Vulnerabilities in Language Models via Mechanistic Interpretability [44.99833362998488]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance across a wide range of tasks.
LLMs in particular are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where an imperceptible change to the input can mislead the output of the model.
We propose a method, based on Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) techniques, to guide this process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T09:55:34Z) - A Survey of Attacks on Large Vision-Language Models: Resources, Advances, and Future Trends [78.3201480023907]
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of multimodal understanding and reasoning tasks.
The vulnerability of LVLMs is relatively underexplored, posing potential security risks in daily usage.
In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the various forms of existing LVLM attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-10T06:57:58Z) - Towards Explainable Vulnerability Detection with Large Language Models [17.96542494363619]
Software vulnerabilities pose significant risks to the security and integrity of software systems.
The advent of large language models (LLMs) has introduced transformative potential due to their advanced generative capabilities.
In this paper, we propose LLMVulExp, an automated framework designed to specialize LLMs for the dual tasks of vulnerability detection and explanation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-14T04:01:25Z) - Understanding Privacy Risks of Embeddings Induced by Large Language Models [75.96257812857554]
Large language models show early signs of artificial general intelligence but struggle with hallucinations.
One promising solution is to store external knowledge as embeddings, aiding LLMs in retrieval-augmented generation.
Recent studies experimentally showed that the original text can be partially reconstructed from text embeddings by pre-trained language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-25T13:10:48Z) - Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learning [61.2224355547598]
Open-sourcing of large language models (LLMs) accelerates application development, innovation, and scientific progress.
Our investigation exposes a critical oversight in this belief.
By deploying carefully designed demonstrations, our research demonstrates that base LLMs could effectively interpret and execute malicious instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-16T13:22:54Z) - Fine-Tuning, Quantization, and LLMs: Navigating Unintended Outcomes [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption across various domains, including chatbots and auto-task completion agents.
These models are susceptible to safety vulnerabilities such as jailbreaking, prompt injection, and privacy leakage attacks.
This study investigates the impact of these modifications on LLM safety, a critical consideration for building reliable and secure AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-05T20:31:45Z) - Revisiting Jailbreaking for Large Language Models: A Representation Engineering Perspective [43.94115802328438]
Recent surge in jailbreaking attacks has revealed significant vulnerabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) when exposed to malicious inputs.
We suggest that the self-safeguarding capability of LLMs is linked to specific activity patterns within their representation space.
Our findings demonstrate that these patterns can be detected with just a few pairs of contrastive queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T00:50:04Z) - Privacy in Large Language Models: Attacks, Defenses and Future Directions [84.73301039987128]
We analyze the current privacy attacks targeting large language models (LLMs) and categorize them according to the adversary's assumed capabilities.
We present a detailed overview of prominent defense strategies that have been developed to counter these privacy attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-16T13:23:54Z) - On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models [127.1107824751703]
We investigate the potential misuse of modern Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating credible-sounding misinformation.
Our study reveals that LLMs can act as effective misinformation generators, leading to a significant degradation in the performance of Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T04:10:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.