M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14902v2
• Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:04:48 GMT
• Title: M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection
• Authors: Yuxia Wang, Jonibek Mansurov, Petar Ivanov, Jinyan Su, Artem Shelmanov, Akim Tsvigun, Chenxi Whitehouse, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Tarek Mahmoud, Toru Sasaki, Thomas Arnold, Alham Fikri Aji, Nizar Habash, Iryna Gurevych, Preslav Nakov
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability to generate fluent responses to a wide variety of user queries. This has also raised concerns about the potential misuse of such texts in journalism, education, and academia. In this study, we strive to create automated systems that can detect machine-generated texts and pinpoint potential misuse.
• Score: 69.29017069438228
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability to generate fluent responses to a wide variety of user queries. However, this has also raised concerns about the potential misuse of such texts in journalism, education, and academia. In this study, we strive to create automated systems that can detect machine-generated texts and pinpoint potential misuse. We first introduce a large-scale benchmark \textbf{M4}, which is a multi-generator, multi-domain, and multi-lingual corpus for machine-generated text detection. Through an extensive empirical study of this dataset, we show that it is challenging for detectors to generalize well on instances from unseen domains or LLMs. In such cases, detectors tend to misclassify machine-generated text as human-written. These results show that the problem is far from solved and that there is a lot of room for improvement. We believe that our dataset will enable future research towards more robust approaches to this pressing societal problem. The dataset is available at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/M4.

Related papers

• RKadiyala at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Black-Box Word-Level Text Boundary Detection in Partially Machine Generated Texts [0.0]
  This paper introduces few reliable approaches for identifying which part of a given text is machine generated at a word level. We present a comparison with proprietary systems, performance of our model on unseen domains' and generators' texts. The findings reveal significant improvements in detection accuracy along with comparison on other aspects of detection capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T03:21:59Z)
• AMPLE: Emotion-Aware Multimodal Fusion Prompt Learning for Fake News Detection [0.1499944454332829]
  This paper introduces Emotion-textbfAware textbfMultimodal Fusion textbfPrompt textbfLtextbfEarning (textbfAMPLE) framework to address the above issue. This framework extracts emotional elements from texts by leveraging sentiment analysis tools. It then employs Multi-Head Cross-Attention (MCA) mechanisms and similarity-aware fusion methods to integrate multimodal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T02:19:24Z)
• Detecting Machine-Generated Long-Form Content with Latent-Space Variables [54.07946647012579]
  Existing zero-shot detectors primarily focus on token-level distributions, which are vulnerable to real-world domain shifts. We propose a more robust method that incorporates abstract elements, such as event transitions, as key deciding factors to detect machine versus human texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T18:42:09Z)
• LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection [87.43727192273772]
  It is often hard to tell whether a piece of text was human-written or machine-generated. We present LLM-DetectAIve, designed for fine-grained detection. It supports four categories: (i) human-written, (ii) machine-generated, (iii) machine-written, then machine-humanized, and (iv) human-written, then machine-polished.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T07:43:17Z)
• SMLT-MUGC: Small, Medium, and Large Texts -- Machine versus User-Generated Content Detection and Comparison [2.7147912878168303]
  We compare the performance of machine learning algorithms on four datasets: (1) small (tweets from Election, FIFA, and Game of Thrones), (2) medium (Wikipedia introductions and PubMed abstracts), and (3) large (OpenAI web text dataset) Our results indicate that LLMs with very large parameters (such as the XL-1542 variant of GPT2 with 1542 million parameters) were harder to detect using traditional machine learning methods. We examine the characteristics of human and machine-generated texts across multiple dimensions, including linguistics, personality, sentiment, bias, and morality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T22:19:01Z)
• M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection [69.41274756177336]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have brought an unprecedented surge in machine-generated text (MGT) across diverse channels. This raises legitimate concerns about its potential misuse and societal implications. We introduce a new benchmark based on a multilingual, multi-domain, and multi-generator corpus of MGTs -- M4GT-Bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T02:50:33Z)
• Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Texts [27.956604193427772]
  Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled (MPU) training framework is proposed to address the difficulty of short-text detection. MPU method augments detection performance on long AI-generated texts, and significantly improves short-text detection of language model detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T15:25:00Z)
• MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild [82.70561073277801]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved human-level text generation, emphasizing the need for effective AI-generated text detection. We build a comprehensive testbed by gathering texts from diverse human writings and texts generated by different LLMs. Despite challenges, the top-performing detector can identify 86.54% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:13:29Z)
• On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detection [76.55825911221434]
  We argue that as machine-generated text approximates human-like quality, the sample size needed for detection bounds increases. We test various state-of-the-art text generators, including GPT-2, GPT-3.5-Turbo, Llama, Llama-2-13B-Chat-HF, and Llama-2-70B-Chat-HF, against detectors, including oBERTa-Large/Base-Detector, GPTZero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T17:47:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.