LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04284v2
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:26:20 GMT
- Title: LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection
- Authors: Mervat Abassy, Kareem Elozeiri, Alexander Aziz, Minh Ngoc Ta, Raj Vardhan Tomar, Bimarsha Adhikari, Saad El Dine Ahmed, Yuxia Wang, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Zhuohan Xie, Jonibek Mansurov, Ekaterina Artemova, Vladislav Mikhailov, Rui Xing, Jiahui Geng, Hasan Iqbal, Zain Muhammad Mujahid, Tarek Mahmoud, Akim Tsvigun, Alham Fikri Aji, Artem Shelmanov, Nizar Habash, Iryna Gurevych, Preslav Nakov,
- Abstract summary: It is often hard to tell whether a piece of text was human-written or machine-generated.
We present LLM-DetectAIve, designed for fine-grained detection.
It supports four categories: (i) human-written, (ii) machine-generated, (iii) machine-written, then machine-humanized, and (iv) human-written, then machine-polished.
- Score: 87.43727192273772
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The ease of access to large language models (LLMs) has enabled a widespread of machine-generated texts, and now it is often hard to tell whether a piece of text was human-written or machine-generated. This raises concerns about potential misuse, particularly within educational and academic domains. Thus, it is important to develop practical systems that can automate the process. Here, we present one such system, LLM-DetectAIve, designed for fine-grained detection. Unlike most previous work on machine-generated text detection, which focused on binary classification, LLM-DetectAIve supports four categories: (i) human-written, (ii) machine-generated, (iii) machine-written, then machine-humanized, and (iv) human-written, then machine-polished. Category (iii) aims to detect attempts to obfuscate the fact that a text was machine-generated, while category (iv) looks for cases where the LLM was used to polish a human-written text, which is typically acceptable in academic writing, but not in education. Our experiments show that LLM-DetectAIve can effectively identify the above four categories, which makes it a potentially useful tool in education, academia, and other domains. LLM-DetectAIve is publicly accessible at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/LLM-DetectAIve. The video describing our system is available at https://youtu.be/E8eT_bE7k8c.
Related papers
- Imitate Before Detect: Aligning Machine Stylistic Preference for Machine-Revised Text Detection [39.62360229183229]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized text generation.
detecting machine-generated text increasingly challenging.
We propose the "Imitate Before Detect" (ImBD) approach, which first imitates the machine-style token distribution.
We then compare the distribution of the text to be tested with the machine-style distribution to determine whether the text has been machine-revised.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-11T03:17:14Z) - DetectRL: Benchmarking LLM-Generated Text Detection in Real-World Scenarios [38.952481877244644]
We present a new benchmark, DetectRL, highlighting that even state-of-the-art (SOTA) detection techniques still underperformed in this task.
Our development of DetectRL reveals the strengths and limitations of current SOTA detectors.
We believe DetectRL could serve as an effective benchmark for assessing detectors in real-world scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T09:01:25Z) - GigaCheck: Detecting LLM-generated Content [72.27323884094953]
In this work, we investigate the task of generated text detection by proposing the GigaCheck.
Our research explores two approaches: (i) distinguishing human-written texts from LLM-generated ones, and (ii) detecting LLM-generated intervals in Human-Machine collaborative texts.
Specifically, we use a fine-tuned general-purpose LLM in conjunction with a DETR-like detection model, adapted from computer vision, to localize AI-generated intervals within text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T08:30:55Z) - MOSAIC: Multiple Observers Spotting AI Content, a Robust Approach to Machine-Generated Text Detection [35.67613230687864]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained at scale and endowed with powerful text-generating abilities.
Various proposals have been made to automatically discriminate artificially generated from human-written texts.
We derive a new, theoretically grounded approach to combine their respective strengths.
Our experiments, using a variety of generator LLMs, suggest that our method effectively leads to robust detection performances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-11T20:55:12Z) - AuthentiGPT: Detecting Machine-Generated Text via Black-Box Language
Models Denoising [4.924903495092775]
Large language models (LLMs) create text that closely mimics human writing, which can lead to potential misuse.
We present AuthentiGPT, an efficient classifier that distinguishes between machine-generated and human-written texts.
With a 0.918 AUROC score on a domain-specific dataset, AuthentiGPT demonstrates its effectiveness over other commercial algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T19:36:54Z) - LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection
Tool [119.0952092533317]
Large language models (LLMs) are remarkably close to high-quality human-authored text.
Existing detection tools can only differentiate between machine-generated and human-authored text.
We propose LLMDet, a model-specific, secure, efficient, and extendable detection tool.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T10:45:16Z) - M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box
Machine-Generated Text Detection [69.29017069438228]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability to generate fluent responses to a wide variety of user queries.
This has also raised concerns about the potential misuse of such texts in journalism, education, and academia.
In this study, we strive to create automated systems that can detect machine-generated texts and pinpoint potential misuse.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T08:55:11Z) - MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild [82.70561073277801]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved human-level text generation, emphasizing the need for effective AI-generated text detection.
We build a comprehensive testbed by gathering texts from diverse human writings and texts generated by different LLMs.
Despite challenges, the top-performing detector can identify 86.54% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T17:13:29Z) - Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected? [50.95804851595018]
Large Language Models (LLMs) perform impressively well in various applications.
The potential for misuse of these models in activities such as plagiarism, generating fake news, and spamming has raised concern about their responsible use.
We stress-test the robustness of these AI text detectors in the presence of an attacker.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-17T17:53:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.