Estimating class separability of text embeddings with persistent homology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15016v4
• Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:43:18 GMT
• Title: Estimating class separability of text embeddings with persistent homology
• Authors: Kostis Gourgoulias, Najah Ghalyan, Maxime Labonne, Yash Satsangi, Sean Moran, Joseph Sabelja,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces an unsupervised method to estimate the class separability of text datasets from a topological point of view. We show how this technique can be applied to detect when the training process stops improving the separability of the embeddings. Our results, validated across binary and multi-class text classification tasks, show that the proposed method's estimates of class separability align with those obtained from supervised methods.
• Score: 1.9956517534421363
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces an unsupervised method to estimate the class separability of text datasets from a topological point of view. Using persistent homology, we demonstrate how tracking the evolution of embedding manifolds during training can inform about class separability. More specifically, we show how this technique can be applied to detect when the training process stops improving the separability of the embeddings. Our results, validated across binary and multi-class text classification tasks, show that the proposed method's estimates of class separability align with those obtained from supervised methods. This approach offers a novel perspective on monitoring and improving the fine-tuning of sentence transformers for classification tasks, particularly in scenarios where labeled data is scarce. We also discuss how tracking these quantities can provide additional insights into the properties of the trained classifier.

Related papers

• Rethinking Distance Metrics for Counterfactual Explainability [53.436414009687]
  We investigate a framing for counterfactual generation methods that considers counterfactuals not as independent draws from a region around the reference, but as jointly sampled with the reference from the underlying data distribution. We derive a distance metric, tailored for counterfactual similarity that can be applied to a broad range of settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T15:06:50Z)
• Enhancing Hyperspectral Image Prediction with Contrastive Learning in Low-Label Regime [0.810304644344495]
  Self-supervised contrastive learning is an effective approach for addressing the challenge of limited labelled data. We evaluate the method's performance for both the single-label and multi-label classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T10:20:16Z)
• Contextualizing the Limits of Model & Evaluation Dataset Curation on Semantic Similarity Classification Tasks [1.8130068086063336]
  This paper demonstrates how the limitations of pre-trained models and open evaluation datasets factor into assessing the performance of binary semantic similarity classification tasks. As (1) end-user-facing documentation around the curation of these datasets and pre-trained model training regimes is often not easily accessible and (2) given the lower friction and higher demand to quickly deploy such systems in real-world contexts, our study reinforces prior work showing performance disparities across datasets, embedding techniques and distance metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T17:12:07Z)
• Convolutional autoencoder-based multimodal one-class classification [80.52334952912808]
  One-class classification refers to approaches of learning using data from a single class only. We propose a deep learning one-class classification method suitable for multimodal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T12:31:18Z)
• Fine-Grained Visual Classification using Self Assessment Classifier [12.596520707449027]
  Extracting discriminative features plays a crucial role in the fine-grained visual classification task. In this paper, we introduce a Self Assessment, which simultaneously leverages the representation of the image and top-k prediction classes. We show that our method achieves new state-of-the-art results on CUB200-2011, Stanford Dog, and FGVC Aircraft datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T07:41:27Z)
• Resolving label uncertainty with implicit posterior models [71.62113762278963]
  We propose a method for jointly inferring labels across a collection of data samples. By implicitly assuming the existence of a generative model for which a differentiable predictor is the posterior, we derive a training objective that allows learning under weak beliefs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T18:09:44Z)
• Discriminative Attribution from Counterfactuals [64.94009515033984]
  We present a method for neural network interpretability by combining feature attribution with counterfactual explanations. We show that this method can be used to quantitatively evaluate the performance of feature attribution methods in an objective manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T00:53:34Z)
• Binary Classification from Multiple Unlabeled Datasets via Surrogate Set Classification [94.55805516167369]
  We propose a new approach for binary classification from m U-sets for $mge2$. Our key idea is to consider an auxiliary classification task called surrogate set classification (SSC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-01T07:36:38Z)
• Visualization of Supervised and Self-Supervised Neural Networks via Attribution Guided Factorization [87.96102461221415]
  We develop an algorithm that provides per-class explainability. In an extensive battery of experiments, we demonstrate the ability of our methods to class-specific visualization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-03T18:48:39Z)
• Classifier Chains: A Review and Perspectives [3.752624871808558]
  The family of methods collectively known as classifier chains has become a popular approach to multi-label learning problems. This work provides a review of the techniques and extensions provided in the literature, as well as perspectives for this approach in the domain of multi-label classification in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-26T11:44:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.