A Robust Classifier Under Missing-Not-At-Random Sample Selection Bias

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15641v1
• Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 01:39:51 GMT
• Title: A Robust Classifier Under Missing-Not-At-Random Sample Selection Bias
• Authors: Huy Mai, Wen Huang, Wei Du, Xintao Wu
• Abstract summary: In statistics, Greene's method formulates this type of sample selection with logistic regression as the prediction model. We propose BiasCorr, an algorithm that improves on Greene's method by modifying the original training set. We provide theoretical guarantee for the improvement of BiasCorr over Greene's method by analyzing its bias.
• Score: 15.628927478079913
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The shift between the training and testing distributions is commonly due to sample selection bias, a type of bias caused by non-random sampling of examples to be included in the training set. Although there are many approaches proposed to learn a classifier under sample selection bias, few address the case where a subset of labels in the training set are missing-not-at-random (MNAR) as a result of the selection process. In statistics, Greene's method formulates this type of sample selection with logistic regression as the prediction model. However, we find that simply integrating this method into a robust classification framework is not effective for this bias setting. In this paper, we propose BiasCorr, an algorithm that improves on Greene's method by modifying the original training set in order for a classifier to learn under MNAR sample selection bias. We provide theoretical guarantee for the improvement of BiasCorr over Greene's method by analyzing its bias. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate that BiasCorr produces robust classifiers and can be extended to outperform state-of-the-art classifiers that have been proposed to train under sample selection bias.

Related papers

• CosFairNet:A Parameter-Space based Approach for Bias Free Learning [1.9116784879310025]
  Deep neural networks trained on biased data often inadvertently learn unintended inference rules. We introduce a novel approach to address bias directly in the model's parameter space, preventing its propagation across layers. We show enhanced classification accuracy and debiasing effectiveness across various synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T13:06:40Z)
• Debiased Sample Selection for Combating Noisy Labels [24.296451733127956]
  We propose a noIse-Tolerant Expert Model (ITEM) for debiased learning in sample selection. Specifically, to mitigate the training bias, we design a robust network architecture that integrates with multiple experts. By training on the mixture of two class-discriminative mini-batches, the model mitigates the effect of the imbalanced training set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T10:37:28Z)
• Twice Class Bias Correction for Imbalanced Semi-Supervised Learning [59.90429949214134]
  We introduce a novel approach called textbfTwice textbfClass textbfBias textbfCorrection (textbfTCBC) We estimate the class bias of the model parameters during the training process. We apply a secondary correction to the model's pseudo-labels for unlabeled samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T15:06:36Z)
• Echoes: Unsupervised Debiasing via Pseudo-bias Labeling in an Echo Chamber [17.034228910493056]
  This paper presents experimental analyses revealing that the existing biased models overfit to bias-conflicting samples in the training data. We propose a straightforward and effective method called Echoes, which trains a biased model and a target model with a different strategy. Our approach achieves superior debiasing results compared to the existing baselines on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-06T13:13:18Z)
• Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding [86.8751772146264]
  Existing natural language understanding (NLU) models often rely on dataset biases to achieve high performance on specific datasets. We propose debiasing contrastive learning (DCT) to mitigate biased latent features and neglect the dynamic nature of bias. DCT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on out-of-distribution datasets while maintaining in-distribution performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-11T06:16:14Z)
• Bias Mimicking: A Simple Sampling Approach for Bias Mitigation [57.17709477668213]
  We introduce a new class-conditioned sampling method: Bias Mimicking. Bias Mimicking improves underrepresented groups' accuracy of sampling methods by 3% over four benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T17:33:00Z)
• Learning from a Biased Sample [3.546358664345473]
  We propose a method for learning a decision rule that minimizes the worst-case risk incurred under a family of test distributions. We empirically validate our proposed method in a case study on prediction of mental health scores from health survey data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-05T04:19:16Z)
• Robust Fairness-aware Learning Under Sample Selection Bias [17.09665420515772]
  We propose a framework for robust and fair learning under sample selection bias. We develop two algorithms to handle sample selection bias when test data is both available and unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T23:23:36Z)
• Understanding Classifier Mistakes with Generative Models [88.20470690631372]
  Deep neural networks are effective on supervised learning tasks, but have been shown to be brittle. In this paper, we leverage generative models to identify and characterize instances where classifiers fail to generalize. Our approach is agnostic to class labels from the training set which makes it applicable to models trained in a semi-supervised way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T22:13:21Z)
• Individual Calibration with Randomized Forecasting [116.2086707626651]
  We show that calibration for individual samples is possible in the regression setup if the predictions are randomized. We design a training objective to enforce individual calibration and use it to train randomized regression functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T05:53:10Z)
• Certified Robustness to Label-Flipping Attacks via Randomized Smoothing [105.91827623768724]
  Machine learning algorithms are susceptible to data poisoning attacks. We present a unifying view of randomized smoothing over arbitrary functions. We propose a new strategy for building classifiers that are pointwise-certifiably robust to general data poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-07T21:28:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.