Mapping ChatGPT in Mainstream Media to Unravel Jobs and Diversity Challenges: Early Quantitative Insights through Sentiment Analysis and Word Frequency Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18340v2
• Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 19:21:02 GMT
• Title: Mapping ChatGPT in Mainstream Media to Unravel Jobs and Diversity Challenges: Early Quantitative Insights through Sentiment Analysis and Word Frequency Analysis
• Authors: Maya Karanouh
• Abstract summary: This article presents a quantitative data analysis of the early trends and sentiments revealed by conducting text mining and NLP methods. The findings revealed in sentiment analysis, ChatGPT and artificial intelligence, were perceived more positively than negatively in the mainstream media. This article is a critical analysis into the power structures and collusions between Big Tech and Big Media in their hegemonic exclusion of diversity and job challenges from mainstream media.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The exponential growth in user acquisition and popularity of OpenAIs ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence(AI) powered chatbot, was accompanied by widespread mainstream media coverage. This article presents a quantitative data analysis of the early trends and sentiments revealed by conducting text mining and NLP methods onto a corpus of 10,902 mainstream news headlines related to the subject of ChatGPT and artificial intelligence, from the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022 to March 2023. The findings revealed in sentiment analysis, ChatGPT and artificial intelligence, were perceived more positively than negatively in the mainstream media. In regards to word frequency results, over sixty-five percent of the top frequency words were focused on Big Tech issues and actors while topics such as jobs, diversity, ethics, copyright, gender and women were poorly represented or completely absent and only accounted for six percent of the total corpus. This article is a critical analysis into the power structures and collusions between Big Tech and Big Media in their hegemonic exclusion of diversity and job challenges from mainstream media.

Related papers

• Journalists, Emotions, and the Introduction of Generative AI Chatbots: A Large-Scale Analysis of Tweets Before and After the Launch of ChatGPT [0.0]
  This study investigated the emotional responses of journalists to the release of ChatGPT at the time of its launch. By analyzing nearly 1 million Tweets from journalists at major U.S. news outlets, we tracked changes in emotional tone and sentiment. We found an increase in positive emotion and a more favorable tone post-launch, suggesting initial optimism toward AI's potential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T12:09:20Z)
• How ChatGPT Changed the Media's Narratives on AI: A Semi-Automated Narrative Analysis Through Frame Semantics [0.25822445089477464]
  We perform a mixed-method frame-based analysis on a dataset of more than 49,000 sentences collected from 5 news articles that mention AI. During this period discourse has become increasingly centred around experts and political leaders. A deeper shift of the data suggests the types of threat AI is thought to represent, as well as the qualities of it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-12T13:02:31Z)
• GPT-4V(ision) as A Social Media Analysis Engine [77.23394183063238]
  This paper explores GPT-4V's capabilities for social multimedia analysis. We select five representative tasks, including sentiment analysis, hate speech detection, fake news identification, demographic inference, and political ideology detection. GPT-4V demonstrates remarkable efficacy in these tasks, showcasing strengths such as joint understanding of image-text pairs, contextual and cultural awareness, and extensive commonsense knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T18:36:50Z)
• Unsupervised Sentiment Analysis of Plastic Surgery Social Media Posts [91.3755431537592]
  The massive collection of user posts across social media platforms is primarily untapped for artificial intelligence (AI) use cases. Natural language processing (NLP) is a subfield of AI that leverages bodies of documents, known as corpora, to train computers in human-like language understanding. This study demonstrates that the applied results of unsupervised analysis allow a computer to predict either negative, positive, or neutral user sentiment towards plastic surgery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T20:16:20Z)
• Public Attitudes Toward ChatGPT on Twitter: Sentiments, Topics, and Occupations [1.6466986427682635]
  We investigated public attitudes towards ChatGPT by applying natural language processing techniques such as sentiment analysis. Our sentiment analysis result indicates that the overall sentiment was largely neutral to positive, and negative sentiments were decreasing over time. Our topic model reveals that the most popular topics discussed were Education, Bard, Search Engines, OpenAI, Marketing, and Cybersecurity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T15:10:18Z)
• To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
  This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection. We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains. Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z)
• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• ChatGPT: A Meta-Analysis after 2.5 Months [16.62394237011141]
  We analyze over 300,000 tweets and more than 150 scientific papers to investigate how ChatGPT is perceived and discussed. Our findings show that ChatGPT is generally viewed as of high quality, with positive sentiment and emotions of joy dominating in social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T15:43:22Z)
• A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
  ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)
• Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles [55.92100606666497]
  We first adopt a human-guided machine learning framework to develop a new dataset for hyperpartisan news title detection. Overall the Right media tends to use proportionally more hyperpartisan titles. We identify three major topics including foreign issues, political systems, and societal issues that are suggestive of hyperpartisanship in news titles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T05:56:58Z)
• "I think this is the most disruptive technology": Exploring Sentiments of ChatGPT Early Adopters using Twitter Data [0.0]
  We conduct a mixed-method study using 10,732 tweets from early ChatGPT users. The majority of the early adopters have expressed overwhelmingly positive sentiments related to topics such as Disruptions to software development, Entertainment and exercising creativity. Only a limited percentage of users expressed concerns about issues such as the potential for misuse of ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T12:41:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.