ChatGPT: A Meta-Analysis after 2.5 Months

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13795v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:43:22 GMT
• Title: ChatGPT: A Meta-Analysis after 2.5 Months
• Authors: Christoph Leiter, Ran Zhang, Yanran Chen, Jonas Belouadi, Daniil Larionov, Vivian Fresen and Steffen Eger
• Abstract summary: We analyze over 300,000 tweets and more than 150 scientific papers to investigate how ChatGPT is perceived and discussed. Our findings show that ChatGPT is generally viewed as of high quality, with positive sentiment and emotions of joy dominating in social media.
• Score: 16.62394237011141
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: ChatGPT, a chatbot developed by OpenAI, has gained widespread popularity and media attention since its release in November 2022. However, little hard evidence is available regarding its perception in various sources. In this paper, we analyze over 300,000 tweets and more than 150 scientific papers to investigate how ChatGPT is perceived and discussed. Our findings show that ChatGPT is generally viewed as of high quality, with positive sentiment and emotions of joy dominating in social media. Its perception has slightly decreased since its debut, however, with joy decreasing and (negative) surprise on the rise, and it is perceived more negatively in languages other than English. In recent scientific papers, ChatGPT is characterized as a great opportunity across various fields including the medical domain, but also as a threat concerning ethics and receives mixed assessments for education. Our comprehensive meta-analysis of ChatGPT's current perception after 2.5 months since its release can contribute to shaping the public debate and informing its future development. We make our data available.

Related papers

• Public sentiment analysis and topic modeling regarding ChatGPT in mental health on Reddit: Negative sentiments increase over time [9.874529201649192]
  Researchers used the bert-base-multilingual-uncased-sentiment techniques for sentiment analysis and the BERTopic model for topic modeling. It was found that overall, negative sentiments prevail, followed by positive ones, with neutral sentiments being the least common.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T13:23:11Z)
• Primacy Effect of ChatGPT [69.49920102917598]
  We study the primacy effect of ChatGPT: the tendency of selecting the labels at earlier positions as the answer. We hope that our experiments and analyses provide additional insights into building more reliable ChatGPT-based solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T00:37:28Z)
• "ChatGPT, a Friend or Foe for Education?" Analyzing the User's Perspectives on the Latest AI Chatbot Via Reddit [0.0]
  This study has analyzed 247 Reddit top posts related to the educational use of ChatGPT. Results show that the majority of the users took a neutral viewpoint. There was more positive perception than negative regarding the usefulness of ChatGPT in education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T23:59:44Z)
• Public Attitudes Toward ChatGPT on Twitter: Sentiments, Topics, and Occupations [1.6466986427682635]
  We investigated public attitudes towards ChatGPT by applying natural language processing techniques such as sentiment analysis. Our sentiment analysis result indicates that the overall sentiment was largely neutral to positive, and negative sentiments were decreasing over time. Our topic model reveals that the most popular topics discussed were Education, Bard, Search Engines, OpenAI, Marketing, and Cybersecurity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T15:10:18Z)
• Mapping ChatGPT in Mainstream Media to Unravel Jobs and Diversity Challenges: Early Quantitative Insights through Sentiment Analysis and Word Frequency Analysis [0.0]
  This article presents a quantitative data analysis of the early trends and sentiments revealed by conducting text mining and NLP methods. The findings revealed in sentiment analysis, ChatGPT and artificial intelligence, were perceived more positively than negatively in the mainstream media. This article is a critical analysis into the power structures and collusions between Big Tech and Big Media in their hegemonic exclusion of diversity and job challenges from mainstream media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T15:10:51Z)
• One Small Step for Generative AI, One Giant Leap for AGI: A Complete Survey on ChatGPT in AIGC Era [95.2284704286191]
  GPT-4 (a.k.a. ChatGPT plus) is one small step for generative AI (GAI) but one giant leap for artificial general intelligence (AGI) Since its official release in November 2022, ChatGPT has quickly attracted numerous users with extensive media coverage. This work is the first to survey ChatGPT with a comprehensive review of its underlying technology, applications, and challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T06:22:09Z)
• To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
  This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection. We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains. Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z)
• Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERT [103.57103957631067]
  ChatGPT has attracted great attention, as it can generate fluent and high-quality responses to human inquiries. We evaluate ChatGPT's understanding ability by evaluating it on the most popular GLUE benchmark, and comparing it with 4 representative fine-tuned BERT-style models. We find that: 1) ChatGPT falls short in handling paraphrase and similarity tasks; 2) ChatGPT outperforms all BERT models on inference tasks by a large margin; 3) ChatGPT achieves comparable performance compared with BERT on sentiment analysis and question answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T12:29:33Z)
• A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
  ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)
• Fine-tuned Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Social Media Data: Comparative Study [0.7874708385247353]
  This study investigated and compared public sentiment related to COVID-19 vaccines expressed on two popular social media platforms, Reddit and Twitter. We created a fine-tuned DistilRoBERTa model to predict sentiments of approximately 9.5 million Tweets and 70 thousand Reddit comments. Our results determined that the average sentiment expressed on Twitter was more negative (52% positive) than positive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T16:22:18Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.