ANPL: Towards Natural Programming with Interactive Decomposition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18498v2
• Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:08:54 GMT
• Title: ANPL: Towards Natural Programming with Interactive Decomposition
• Authors: Di Huang, Ziyuan Nan, Xing Hu, Pengwei Jin, Shaohui Peng, Yuanbo Wen, Rui Zhang, Zidong Du, Qi Guo, Yewen Pu, Yunji Chen
• Abstract summary: We introduce an interactive ANPL system that ensures users can always refine the generated code. An ANPL program consists of a set of input-outputs that it must satisfy. The user revises an ANPL program by either modifying the sketch, changing the language used to describe the holes, or providing additional input-outputs to a particular hole.
• Score: 33.58825633046242
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Though LLMs are capable of generating plausible programs, it's challenging to interact with the LLMs further to revise the program, especially if the user's specific requirements are different from the initial proposal. In this paper, we introduce ANPL, an interactive programming system that ensures users can always refine the generated code towards their specific programmatic intents via structured decompositions. Borrowing the paradigm of sketching from program synthesis, an ANPL program consists of a set of input-outputs that it must satisfy, a ``sketch'' -- control/data flow expressed in precise code (e.g. Python), and ``holes'' -- sub-modules to be implemented by the LLM specified with natural language. The user revises an ANPL program by either modifying the sketch, changing the language used to describe the holes, or providing additional input-outputs to a particular hole, turning it into a sub-ANPL program that can be solved recursively. This workflow allows the users to offload programming burdens to the LLM as much as possible while retaining the ability to pinpoint and resolve bugs locally, without exposing the rest of the program to the LLM. We deploy ANPL on the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC), a set of unique tasks that are challenging for state-of-the-art AI systems, showing it outperforms baseline programming systems that (a) without the ability to decompose tasks interactively and (b) without the guarantee that the modules can be correctly composed together. Additional evaluations on APPS, HumanEval, and real-world programming tasks have validated that the ANPL framework is applicable to multiple programming domains. We release the ANPL solutions to the ARC tasks as a dataset, providing insights into how humans decompose novel tasks programmatically. See our code at https://iprc-dip.github.io/ANPL/.

Related papers

• Exploring RL-based LLM Training for Formal Language Tasks with Programmed Rewards [49.7719149179179]
  This paper investigates the feasibility of using PPO for reinforcement learning (RL) from explicitly programmed reward signals. We focus on tasks expressed through formal languages, such as programming, where explicit reward functions can be programmed to automatically assess quality of generated outputs. Our results show that pure RL-based training for the two formal language tasks is challenging, with success being limited even for the simple arithmetic task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T15:59:58Z)
• Large Language Models are Interpretable Learners [53.56735770834617]
  In this paper, we show a combination of Large Language Models (LLMs) and symbolic programs can bridge the gap between expressiveness and interpretability. The pretrained LLM with natural language prompts provides a massive set of interpretable modules that can transform raw input into natural language concepts. As the knowledge learned by LSP is a combination of natural language descriptions and symbolic rules, it is easily transferable to humans (interpretable) and other LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T02:18:15Z)
• APPL: A Prompt Programming Language for Harmonious Integration of Programs and Large Language Model Prompts [21.819126948549766]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become increasingly capable of handling diverse tasks with the aid of well-crafted prompts. APPL acts as a bridge between computer programs and LLMs, allowing seamless embedding of prompts into Python functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T02:29:59Z)
• Synthetic Programming Elicitation for Text-to-Code in Very Low-Resource Programming and Formal Languages [21.18996339478024]
  We introduce emphsynthetic programming elicitation and compilation (SPEAC) SPEAC produces syntactically correct programs more frequently and without sacrificing semantic correctness. We empirically evaluate the performance of SPEAC in a case study for the UCLID5 formal verification language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T22:16:19Z)
• Synthesizing Programmatic Reinforcement Learning Policies with Large Language Model Guided Search [7.769411917500852]
  We introduce a novel LLM-guided search framework (LLM-GS) Our key insight is to leverage the programming expertise and common sense reasoning of LLMs to enhance the efficiency of assumption-free, random-guessing search methods. We develop a search algorithm named Scheduled Hill Climbing, designed to efficiently explore the programmatic search space to improve the programs consistently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T06:33:48Z)
• HYSYNTH: Context-Free LLM Approximation for Guiding Program Synthesis [25.260063704712458]
  Large language models (LLMs) often fail to produce fully correct programs in unfamiliar DSLs. Motivated by these limitations, we introduce a hybrid approach, where LLM completions for a given task are used to learn a task-specific, context-free surrogate model. We evaluate this hybrid approach on three domains, and show that it outperforms both unguided search and direct sampling from LLMs, as well as existing program synthesizers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T18:45:51Z)
• MTLLM: LLMs are Meaning-Typed Code Constructs [7.749453456370407]
  This paper presents a simplified approach to integrating large language models (LLMs) into programming. Our approach utilizes the semantic richness in existing programs to automatically translate between the traditional programming languages and the natural language. We present a fully functional and production-grade implementation for our approach and compare it to SOTA LLM software development tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T21:12:01Z)
• Self-Training Large Language Models for Improved Visual Program Synthesis With Visual Reinforcement [93.73648674743097]
  Visual program synthesis is a promising approach to exploit the reasoning abilities of large language models for compositional computer vision tasks. Previous work has used few-shot prompting with frozen LLMs to synthesize visual programs. No dataset of visual programs for training exists, and acquisition of a visual program dataset cannot be easily crowdsourced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T13:25:00Z)
• If LLM Is the Wizard, Then Code Is the Wand: A Survey on How Code Empowers Large Language Models to Serve as Intelligent Agents [81.60906807941188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on a combination of natural language and formal language (code) Code translates high-level goals into executable steps, featuring standard syntax, logical consistency, abstraction, and modularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T16:51:20Z)
• Low-code LLM: Graphical User Interface over Large Language Models [115.08718239772107]
  This paper introduces a novel human-LLM interaction framework, Low-code LLM. It incorporates six types of simple low-code visual programming interactions to achieve more controllable and stable responses. We highlight three advantages of the low-code LLM: user-friendly interaction, controllable generation, and wide applicability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T09:27:40Z)
• Hierarchical Programmatic Reinforcement Learning via Learning to Compose Programs [58.94569213396991]
  We propose a hierarchical programmatic reinforcement learning framework to produce program policies. By learning to compose programs, our proposed framework can produce program policies that describe out-of-distributionally complex behaviors. The experimental results in the Karel domain show that our proposed framework outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T14:50:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.