Human-centric Literature on Trust for SfTI Veracity Spearhead

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00226v1
• Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 22:46:44 GMT
• Title: Human-centric Literature on Trust for SfTI Veracity Spearhead
• Authors: Kelly Blincoe, Markus Luczak-Roesch, Tim Miller, Matthias Galster
• Abstract summary: This report was created for the Science for Technological Innovation Veracity Spearhead supported by New Zealand's National Science Challenges. We summarize literature on trust in face-to-face interactions from other fields, followed by a discussion of organizational trust, technology-mediated trust, trust of software products, trust of AI, and blockchain.
• Score: 7.457457781418842
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This article summarizes the literature on trust of digital technologies from a human-centric perspective. We summarize literature on trust in face-to-face interactions from other fields, followed by a discussion of organizational trust, technology-mediated trust, trust of software products, trust of AI, and blockchain. This report was created for the Science for Technological Innovation Veracity Spearhead supported by New Zealand's National Science Challenges.

Related papers

• Rethinking Trust in AI Assistants for Software Development: A Critical Review [16.774993642353724]
  Trust is a fundamental concept in human decision-making and collaboration. Software engineering articles often use the term 'trust' informally. Without a common definition, true secondary research on trust is impossible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T19:52:21Z)
• The Jade Gateway to Trust: Exploring How Socio-Cultural Perspectives Shape Trust Within Chinese NFT Communities [53.778565588482294]
  The emergence of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) has transformed how we handle digital assets and value. Despite their initial popularity, NFTs face declining adoption influenced not only by cryptocurrency volatility but also by trust dynamics within communities. Our research identifies three critical trust dimensions in China's NFT market: technological, institutional, and social.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T10:03:30Z)
• Trust and distrust in electoral technologies: what can we learn from the failure of electronic voting in the Netherlands (2006/07) [0.0]
  This paper focuses on the complex dynamics of trust and distrust in digital government technologies by approaching the cancellation of machine voting in the Netherlands (2006-07) It describes how a previously trusted system can collapse, how paradoxical the relationship between trust and distrust is, and how it interacts with adopting and managing electoral technologies. Overall, this paper contributes to understanding trust dynamics in digital government technologies, with implications for policymaking and technology adoption strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T14:07:59Z)
• Conceptualizing Trustworthiness and Trust in Communications [17.69113057959175]
  We present a novel holistic approach on how to tackle trustworthiness systematically in the context of communications. We propose a first attempt to incorporate objective system properties and subjective beliefs to establish trustworthiness-based trust, in particular in the context of the future Tactile Internet connecting robotic devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T06:11:13Z)
• Authenticity in Authorship: The Writer's Integrity Framework for Verifying Human-Generated Text [0.0]
  "Writer's Integrity" framework monitors the writing process, rather than the product, capturing the distinct behavioral footprint of human authorship. We highlight its potential in revolutionizing the validation of human intellectual work, emphasizing its role in upholding academic integrity and intellectual property rights. This paper outlines a business model for tech companies to monetize the framework effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T23:00:34Z)
• Trust in AI: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions [6.724854390957174]
  The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in our daily life explains the significance of trust/distrust in AI from a user perspective. Trust/distrust in AI plays the role of a regulator and could significantly control the level of this diffusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T20:26:49Z)
• Towards Machines that Trust: AI Agents Learn to Trust in the Trust Game [11.788352764861369]
  We present a theoretical analysis of the $textittrust game$, the canonical task for studying trust in behavioral and brain sciences. Specifically, leveraging reinforcement learning to train our AI agents, we investigate learning trust under various parameterizations of this task. Our theoretical analysis, corroborated by the simulations results presented, provides a mathematical basis for the emergence of trust in the trust game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T09:32:07Z)
• Common (good) practices measuring trust in HRI [55.2480439325792]
  Trust in robots is widely believed to be imperative for the adoption of robots into people's daily lives. Researchers have been exploring how people trust robot in different ways. Most roboticists agree that insufficient levels of trust lead to a risk of disengagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T20:52:10Z)
• Trustworthy Machine Learning [57.08542102068706]
  This textbook on Trustworthy Machine Learning (TML) covers a theoretical and technical background of four key topics in TML. We discuss important classical and contemporary research papers of the aforementioned fields and uncover and connect their underlying intuitions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T11:04:17Z)
• The Semantic Reader Project: Augmenting Scholarly Documents through AI-Powered Interactive Reading Interfaces [54.2590226904332]
  We describe the Semantic Reader Project, a effort across multiple institutions to explore automatic creation of dynamic reading interfaces for research papers. Ten prototype interfaces have been developed and more than 300 participants and real-world users have shown improved reading experiences. We structure this paper around challenges scholars and the public face when reading research papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T02:47:09Z)
• KGTrust: Evaluating Trustworthiness of SIoT via Knowledge Enhanced Graph Neural Networks [63.531790269009704]
  Social Internet of Things (SIoT) is a promising and emerging paradigm that injects the notion of social networking into smart objects (i.e., things) Due to the risks and uncertainty, a crucial and urgent problem to be settled is establishing reliable relationships within SIoT, that is, trust evaluation. We propose a novel knowledge-enhanced graph neural network (KGTrust) for better trust evaluation in SIoT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:24:45Z)
• Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspective [56.80107647520364]
  We draw from communication theories and literature on trust in technologies to develop a conceptual model called MATCH. We highlight transparency and interaction as AI systems' affordances that present a wide range of trustworthiness cues to users. We propose a checklist of requirements to help technology creators identify appropriate cues to use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T00:14:33Z)
• Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI [55.4046755826066]
  We discuss a model of trust inspired by, but not identical to, sociology's interpersonal trust (i.e., trust between people) We incorporate a formalization of 'contractual trust', such that trust between a user and an AI is trust that some implicit or explicit contract will hold. We discuss how to design trustworthy AI, how to evaluate whether trust has manifested, and whether it is warranted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T03:07:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.