Authenticity in Authorship: The Writer's Integrity Framework for Verifying Human-Generated Text

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10781v1
• Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 23:00:34 GMT
• Title: Authenticity in Authorship: The Writer's Integrity Framework for Verifying Human-Generated Text
• Authors: Sanad Aburass, Maha Abu Rumman,
• Abstract summary: "Writer's Integrity" framework monitors the writing process, rather than the product, capturing the distinct behavioral footprint of human authorship. We highlight its potential in revolutionizing the validation of human intellectual work, emphasizing its role in upholding academic integrity and intellectual property rights. This paper outlines a business model for tech companies to monetize the framework effectively.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The "Writer's Integrity" framework introduces a paradigm shift in maintaining the sanctity of human-generated text in the realms of academia, research, and publishing. This innovative system circumvents the shortcomings of current AI detection tools by monitoring the writing process, rather than the product, capturing the distinct behavioral footprint of human authorship. Here, we offer a comprehensive examination of the framework, its development, and empirical results. We highlight its potential in revolutionizing the validation of human intellectual work, emphasizing its role in upholding academic integrity and intellectual property rights in the face of sophisticated AI models capable of emulating human-like text. This paper also discusses the implementation considerations, addressing potential user concerns regarding ease of use and privacy, and outlines a business model for tech companies to monetize the framework effectively. Through licensing, partnerships, and subscriptions, companies can cater to universities, publishers, and independent writers, ensuring the preservation of original thought and effort in written content. This framework is open source and available here, https://github.com/sanadv/Integrity.github.io

Related papers

• "It was 80% me, 20% AI": Seeking Authenticity in Co-Writing with Large Language Models [97.22914355737676]
  We examine whether and how writers want to preserve their authentic voice when co-writing with AI tools. Our findings illuminate conceptions of authenticity in human-AI co-creation. Readers' responses showed less concern about human-AI co-writing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T04:42:32Z)
• Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges [16.35265384114857]
  The rapid advancements of Large Language Models (LLMs) have blurred the lines between human and machine authorship. This literature review serves a roadmap for researchers and practitioners interested in understanding the state of the art in this rapidly evolving field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T17:58:49Z)
• The Impact of AI on Academic Research and Publishing [0.6144680854063939]
  Generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies like ChatGPT have significantly impacted academic writing and publishing. This paper examines ethical considerations surrounding the integration of AI into academia, focusing on the potential for this technology to be used for scholarly misconduct. The findings highlight the need for collaborative approaches to AI usage among publishers, editors, reviewers, and authors to ensure that this technology is used ethically and productively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T04:10:18Z)
• JAMDEC: Unsupervised Authorship Obfuscation using Constrained Decoding over Small Language Models [53.83273575102087]
  We propose an unsupervised inference-time approach to authorship obfuscation. We introduce JAMDEC, a user-controlled, inference-time algorithm for authorship obfuscation. Our approach builds on small language models such as GPT2-XL in order to help avoid disclosing the original content to proprietary LLM's APIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T19:54:29Z)
• Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Technical Perspective [58.84343394349887]
  Generative AI has witnessed rapid advancement in recent years, expanding their capabilities to create synthesized content such as text, images, audio, and code. The high fidelity and authenticity of contents generated by these Deep Generative Models (DGMs) have sparked significant copyright concerns. This work delves into this issue by providing a comprehensive overview of copyright protection from a technical perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T04:00:33Z)
• A Dataset and Benchmark for Copyright Infringement Unlearning from Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [52.49582606341111]
  Copyright law confers creators the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and monetize their creative works. Recent progress in text-to-image generation has introduced formidable challenges to copyright enforcement. We introduce a novel pipeline that harmonizes CLIP, ChatGPT, and diffusion models to curate a dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T11:14:01Z)
• Detection of Machine-Generated Text: Literature Survey [0.0]
  This literature survey aims to compile and synthesize accomplishments and developments in the field of machine-generated text. It also gives an overview of machine-generated text trends and explores the larger societal implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T01:44:15Z)
• Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI [0.0]
  This Perspective maps out principles and methods for using generative artificial intelligence (AI) to elevate the quality and efficiency of academic writing. We introduce a human-AI collaborative framework that delineates the rationale (why), process (how), and nature (what) of AI engagement in writing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T04:35:00Z)
• Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection: A Survey [97.33926242130732]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the domain of natural language processing (NLP) with remarkable capabilities of generating human-like text responses. Despite these advancements, several works in the existing literature have raised serious concerns about the potential misuse of LLMs. To address these concerns, a consensus among the research community is to develop algorithmic solutions to detect AI-generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T18:11:32Z)
• PaperCard for Reporting Machine Assistance in Academic Writing [48.33722012818687]
  ChatGPT, a question-answering system released by OpenAI in November 2022, has demonstrated a range of capabilities that could be utilised in producing academic papers. This raises critical questions surrounding the concept of authorship in academia. We propose a framework we name "PaperCard", a documentation for human authors to transparently declare the use of AI in their writing process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T14:28:04Z)
• Beyond Summarization: Designing AI Support for Real-World Expository Writing Tasks [28.702425557409516]
  Large language models have introduced exciting new opportunities and challenges in designing and developing new AI-assisted writing support tools. Recent work has shown that leveraging this new technology can transform writing in many scenarios such as ideation during creative writing, editing support, and summarization. We argue that developing AI supports for expository writing has unique and exciting research challenges and can lead to high real-world impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T17:47:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.