Adversary for Social Good: Leveraging Adversarial Attacks to Protect Personal Attribute Privacy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02488v1
• Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 21:40:23 GMT
• Title: Adversary for Social Good: Leveraging Adversarial Attacks to Protect Personal Attribute Privacy
• Authors: Xiaoting Li, Lingwei Chen, Dinghao Wu
• Abstract summary: We leverage the inherent vulnerability of machine learning to adversarial attacks, and design a novel text-space Adversarial attack for Social Good, called Adv4SG. Our method can effectively degrade the inference accuracy with less computational cost over different attribute settings, which substantially helps mitigate the impacts of inference attacks and thus achieve high performance in user attribute privacy protection.
• Score: 14.395031313422214
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Social media has drastically reshaped the world that allows billions of people to engage in such interactive environments to conveniently create and share content with the public. Among them, text data (e.g., tweets, blogs) maintains the basic yet important social activities and generates a rich source of user-oriented information. While those explicit sensitive user data like credentials has been significantly protected by all means, personal private attribute (e.g., age, gender, location) disclosure due to inference attacks is somehow challenging to avoid, especially when powerful natural language processing (NLP) techniques have been effectively deployed to automate attribute inferences from implicit text data. This puts users' attribute privacy at risk. To address this challenge, in this paper, we leverage the inherent vulnerability of machine learning to adversarial attacks, and design a novel text-space Adversarial attack for Social Good, called Adv4SG. In other words, we cast the problem of protecting personal attribute privacy as an adversarial attack formulation problem over the social media text data to defend against NLP-based attribute inference attacks. More specifically, Adv4SG proceeds with a sequence of word perturbations under given constraints such that the probed attribute cannot be identified correctly. Different from the prior works, we advance Adv4SG by considering social media property, and introducing cost-effective mechanisms to expedite attribute obfuscation over text data under the black-box setting. Extensive experiments on real-world social media datasets have demonstrated that our method can effectively degrade the inference accuracy with less computational cost over different attribute settings, which substantially helps mitigate the impacts of inference attacks and thus achieve high performance in user attribute privacy protection.

Related papers

• IncogniText: Privacy-enhancing Conditional Text Anonymization via LLM-based Private Attribute Randomization [8.483679748399037]
  We propose IncogniText, a technique that anonymizes the text to mislead a potential adversary into predicting a wrong private attribute value. Our empirical evaluation shows a reduction of private attribute leakage by more than 90%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T09:49:03Z)
• NAP^2: A Benchmark for Naturalness and Privacy-Preserving Text Rewriting by Learning from Human [55.20137833039499]
  We suggest sanitizing sensitive text using two common strategies used by humans. We curate the first corpus, coined NAP2, through both crowdsourcing and the use of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T05:07:44Z)
• Air Gap: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents [44.04662124191715]
  We introduce a novel threat model where adversarial third-party apps manipulate the context of interaction to trick LLM-based agents into revealing private information not relevant to the task at hand. We introduce AirGapAgent, a privacy-conscious agent designed to prevent unintended data leakage by restricting the agent's access to only the data necessary for a specific task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T16:12:45Z)
• Secure Aggregation is Not Private Against Membership Inference Attacks [66.59892736942953]
  We investigate the privacy implications of SecAgg in federated learning. We show that SecAgg offers weak privacy against membership inference attacks even in a single training round. Our findings underscore the imperative for additional privacy-enhancing mechanisms, such as noise injection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T15:07:58Z)
• SoK: Reducing the Vulnerability of Fine-tuned Language Models to Membership Inference Attacks [1.03590082373586]
  We provide the first systematic review of the vulnerability of large language models to membership inference attacks. We find that some training methods provide significantly reduced privacy risk, with the combination of differential privacy and low-rank adaptors achieving the best privacy protection against these attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T12:46:51Z)
• Human intuition as a defense against attribute inference [4.916067949075847]
  Attribute inference has become a major threat to privacy. One way to tackle this threat is to strategically modify one's publicly available data in order to keep one's private information hidden from attribute inference. We evaluate people's ability to perform this task, and compare it against algorithms designed for this purpose.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T06:54:17Z)
• User-Centered Security in Natural Language Processing [0.7106986689736825]
  dissertation proposes a framework of user-centered security in Natural Language Processing (NLP) It focuses on two security domains within NLP with great public interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-10T22:34:19Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• Cross-Network Social User Embedding with Hybrid Differential Privacy Guarantees [81.6471440778355]
  We propose a Cross-network Social User Embedding framework, namely DP-CroSUE, to learn the comprehensive representations of users in a privacy-preserving way. In particular, for each heterogeneous social network, we first introduce a hybrid differential privacy notion to capture the variation of privacy expectations for heterogeneous data types. To further enhance user embeddings, a novel cross-network GCN embedding model is designed to transfer knowledge across networks through those aligned users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T06:22:37Z)
• Attribute Inference Attack of Speech Emotion Recognition in Federated Learning Settings [56.93025161787725]
  Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning paradigm that coordinates clients to train a model collaboratively without sharing local data. We propose an attribute inference attack framework that infers sensitive attribute information of the clients from shared gradients or model parameters. We show that the attribute inference attack is achievable for SER systems trained using FL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-26T16:50:42Z)
• Detecting Cross-Modal Inconsistency to Defend Against Neural Fake News [57.9843300852526]
  We introduce the more realistic and challenging task of defending against machine-generated news that also includes images and captions. To identify the possible weaknesses that adversaries can exploit, we create a NeuralNews dataset composed of 4 different types of generated articles. In addition to the valuable insights gleaned from our user study experiments, we provide a relatively effective approach based on detecting visual-semantic inconsistencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T14:13:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.