Interactive Editing for Text Summarization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03067v1
• Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:43:53 GMT
• Title: Interactive Editing for Text Summarization
• Authors: Yujia Xie, Xun Wang, Si-Qing Chen, Wayne Xiong, Pengcheng He
• Abstract summary: REVISE is a framework designed to facilitate iterative editing and refinement of draft summaries by human writers. At its core, REVISE incorporates a modified fill-in-the-middle model with the encoder-decoder architecture.
• Score: 30.46273082913698
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Summarizing lengthy documents is a common and essential task in our daily lives. Although recent advancements in neural summarization models can assist in crafting general-purpose summaries, human writers often have specific requirements that call for a more customized approach. To address this need, we introduce REVISE (Refinement and Editing via Iterative Summarization Enhancement), an innovative framework designed to facilitate iterative editing and refinement of draft summaries by human writers. Within our framework, writers can effortlessly modify unsatisfactory segments at any location or length and provide optional starting phrases -- our system will generate coherent alternatives that seamlessly integrate with the existing summary. At its core, REVISE incorporates a modified fill-in-the-middle model with the encoder-decoder architecture while developing novel evaluation metrics tailored for the summarization task. In essence, our framework empowers users to create high-quality, personalized summaries by effectively harnessing both human expertise and AI capabilities, ultimately transforming the summarization process into a truly collaborative and adaptive experience.

Related papers

• A Rhetorical Relations-Based Framework for Tailored Multimedia Document Summarization [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel framework for multimedia document summarization. The framework capitalizes on the inherent structure of the document to craft coherent and succinct summaries. Weighting algorithms are employed to assign significance values to document units, thereby enabling effective ranking and selection of relevant content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-26T09:29:59Z)
• DocSum: Domain-Adaptive Pre-training for Document Abstractive Summarization [2.8201999897313015]
  Abstractive summarization has made significant strides in condensing and rephrasing large volumes of text into coherent summaries. Existing models often struggle to adapt to the intricate structure and specialized content of such documents. We introduce DocSum, a domain-adaptive abstractive summarization framework tailored for administrative documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T08:36:50Z)
• Re3: A Holistic Framework and Dataset for Modeling Collaborative Document Revision [62.12545440385489]
  We introduce Re3, a framework for joint analysis of collaborative document revision. We present Re3-Sci, a large corpus of aligned scientific paper revisions manually labeled according to their action and intent. We use the new data to provide first empirical insights into collaborative document revision in the academic domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T21:19:09Z)
• ExeDec: Execution Decomposition for Compositional Generalization in Neural Program Synthesis [54.18659323181771]
  We characterize several different forms of compositional generalization that are desirable in program synthesis. We propose ExeDec, a novel decomposition-based strategy that predicts execution subgoals to solve problems step-by-step informed by program execution at each step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T01:07:52Z)
• SummIt: Iterative Text Summarization via ChatGPT [12.966825834765814]
  We propose SummIt, an iterative text summarization framework based on large language models like ChatGPT. Our framework enables the model to refine the generated summary iteratively through self-evaluation and feedback. We also conduct a human evaluation to validate the effectiveness of the iterative refinements and identify a potential issue of over-correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T07:40:06Z)
• Improving Iterative Text Revision by Learning Where to Edit from Other Revision Tasks [11.495407637511878]
  Iterative text revision improves text quality by fixing grammatical errors, rephrasing for better readability or contextual appropriateness, or reorganizing sentence structures throughout a document. Most recent research has focused on understanding and classifying different types of edits in the iterative revision process from human-written text. We aim to build an end-to-end text revision system that can iteratively generate helpful edits by explicitly detecting editable spans with their corresponding edit intents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-02T18:10:43Z)
• EditEval: An Instruction-Based Benchmark for Text Improvements [73.5918084416016]
  This work presents EditEval: An instruction-based, benchmark and evaluation suite for automatic evaluation of editing capabilities. We evaluate several pre-trained models, which shows that InstructGPT and PEER perform the best, but that most baselines fall below the supervised SOTA. Our analysis shows that commonly used metrics for editing tasks do not always correlate well, and that optimization for prompts with the highest performance does not necessarily entail the strongest robustness to different models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T12:26:05Z)
• PEER: A Collaborative Language Model [70.11876901409906]
  We introduce PEER, a collaborative language model that imitates the entire writing process itself. PEER can write drafts, add suggestions, propose edits and provide explanations for its actions. We show that PEER achieves strong performance across various domains and editing tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-24T16:56:47Z)
• SNaC: Coherence Error Detection for Narrative Summarization [73.48220043216087]
  We introduce SNaC, a narrative coherence evaluation framework rooted in fine-grained annotations for long summaries. We develop a taxonomy of coherence errors in generated narrative summaries and collect span-level annotations for 6.6k sentences across 150 book and movie screenplay summaries. Our work provides the first characterization of coherence errors generated by state-of-the-art summarization models and a protocol for eliciting coherence judgments from crowd annotators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T16:01:47Z)
• Understanding Iterative Revision from Human-Written Text [10.714872525208385]
  IteraTeR is the first large-scale, multi-domain, edit-intention annotated corpus of iteratively revised text. We better understand the text revision process, making vital connections between edit intentions and writing quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T01:47:42Z)
• Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text Summarization [98.27031108197944]
  Span-Fact is a suite of two factual correction models that leverages knowledge learned from question answering models to make corrections in system-generated summaries via span selection. Our models employ single or multi-masking strategies to either iteratively or auto-regressively replace entities in order to ensure semantic consistency w.r.t. the source text. Experiments show that our models significantly boost the factual consistency of system-generated summaries without sacrificing summary quality in terms of both automatic metrics and human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T02:51:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.