Considering Human Factors in Risk Maps for Robust and Foresighted Driver Warning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03849v1
• Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 16:39:58 GMT
• Title: Considering Human Factors in Risk Maps for Robust and Foresighted Driver Warning
• Authors: Tim Puphal, Ryohei Hirano, Malte Probst, Raphael Wenzel and Akihito Kimata
• Abstract summary: We propose a warning system that uses human states in the form of driver errors. The system consists of a behavior planner Risk Maps which directly changes its prediction of the surrounding driving situation. In different simulations of a dynamic lane change and intersection scenarios, we show how the driver's behavior plan can become unsafe.
• Score: 1.4699455652461728
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Driver support systems that include human states in the support process is an active research field. Many recent approaches allow, for example, to sense the driver's drowsiness or awareness of the driving situation. However, so far, this rich information has not been utilized much for improving the effectiveness of support systems. In this paper, we therefore propose a warning system that uses human states in the form of driver errors and can warn users in some cases of upcoming risks several seconds earlier than the state of the art systems not considering human factors. The system consists of a behavior planner Risk Maps which directly changes its prediction of the surrounding driving situation based on the sensed driver errors. By checking if this driver's behavior plan is objectively safe, a more robust and foresighted driver warning is achieved. In different simulations of a dynamic lane change and intersection scenarios, we show how the driver's behavior plan can become unsafe, given the estimate of driver errors, and experimentally validate the advantages of considering human factors.

Related papers

• Reducing Warning Errors in Driver Support with Personalized Risk Maps [1.4230646728710978]
  We propose a warning system that estimates a personalized risk factor for the given driver based on the driver's behavior. The system afterwards is able to adapt the warning signal with personalized Risk Maps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T02:13:40Z)
• Human-Based Risk Model for Improved Driver Support in Interactive Driving Scenarios [0.0]
  We present a human-based risk model that uses driver information for improved driver support. In extensive simulations, we show that our novel human-based risk model achieves earlier warning times and reduced warning errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T02:10:13Z)
• Context-Aware Quantitative Risk Assessment Machine Learning Model for Drivers Distraction [0.0]
  Multi-Class Driver Distraction Risk Assessment (MDDRA) model considers the vehicle, driver, and environmental data during a journey. MDDRA categorises the driver on a risk matrix as safe, careless, or dangerous. We apply machine learning techniques to classify and predict driver distraction according to severity levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T23:20:36Z)
• Infrastructure-based End-to-End Learning and Prevention of Driver Failure [68.0478623315416]
  FailureNet is a recurrent neural network trained end-to-end on trajectories of both nominal and reckless drivers in a scaled miniature city. It can accurately identify control failures, upstream perception errors, and speeding drivers, distinguishing them from nominal driving. Compared to speed or frequency-based predictors, FailureNet's recurrent neural network structure provides improved predictive power, yielding upwards of 84% accuracy when deployed on hardware.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T22:55:51Z)
• FBLNet: FeedBack Loop Network for Driver Attention Prediction [75.83518507463226]
  Nonobjective driving experience is difficult to model. In this paper, we propose a FeedBack Loop Network (FBLNet) which attempts to model the driving experience accumulation procedure. Under the guidance of the incremental knowledge, our model fuses the CNN feature and Transformer feature that are extracted from the input image to predict driver attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T08:25:09Z)
• Safety-aware Motion Prediction with Unseen Vehicles for Autonomous Driving [104.32241082170044]
  We study a new task, safety-aware motion prediction with unseen vehicles for autonomous driving. Unlike the existing trajectory prediction task for seen vehicles, we aim at predicting an occupancy map. Our approach is the first one that can predict the existence of unseen vehicles in most cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-03T13:33:33Z)
• Contingencies from Observations: Tractable Contingency Planning with Learned Behavior Models [82.34305824719101]
  Humans have a remarkable ability to make decisions by accurately reasoning about future events. We develop a general-purpose contingency planner that is learned end-to-end using high-dimensional scene observations. We show how this model can tractably learn contingencies from behavioral observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-21T14:30:20Z)
• Driver Drowsiness Classification Based on Eye Blink and Head Movement Features Using the k-NN Algorithm [8.356765961526955]
  This work is to extend the driver drowsiness detection in vehicles using signals of a driver monitoring camera. For this purpose, 35 features related to the driver's eye blinking behavior and head movements are extracted in driving simulator experiments. A concluding analysis of the best performing feature sets yields valuable insights about the influence of drowsiness on the driver's blink behavior and head movements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T12:37:38Z)
• Can Autonomous Vehicles Identify, Recover From, and Adapt to Distribution Shifts? [104.04999499189402]
  Out-of-training-distribution (OOD) scenarios are a common challenge of learning agents at deployment. We propose an uncertainty-aware planning method, called emphrobust imitative planning (RIP) Our method can detect and recover from some distribution shifts, reducing the overconfident and catastrophic extrapolations in OOD scenes. We introduce an autonomous car novel-scene benchmark, textttCARNOVEL, to evaluate the robustness of driving agents to a suite of tasks with distribution shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T11:07:32Z)
• Driver Intention Anticipation Based on In-Cabin and Driving Scene Monitoring [52.557003792696484]
  We present a framework for the detection of the drivers' intention based on both in-cabin and traffic scene videos. Our framework achieves a prediction with the accuracy of 83.98% and F1-score of 84.3%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-20T11:56:32Z)
• Who Make Drivers Stop? Towards Driver-centric Risk Assessment: Risk Object Identification via Causal Inference [19.71459945458985]
  We propose a driver-centric definition of risk, i.e., objects influencing drivers' behavior are risky. We present a novel two-stage risk object identification framework based on causal inference with the proposed object-level manipulable driving model. Our framework achieves a substantial average performance boost over a strong baseline by 7.5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-05T04:14:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.