Human-Based Risk Model for Improved Driver Support in Interactive Driving Scenarios

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03774v1
• Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:10:13 GMT
• Title: Human-Based Risk Model for Improved Driver Support in Interactive Driving Scenarios
• Authors: Tim Puphal, Benedict Flade, Matti Krüger, Ryohei Hirano, Akihito Kimata,
• Abstract summary: We present a human-based risk model that uses driver information for improved driver support. In extensive simulations, we show that our novel human-based risk model achieves earlier warning times and reduced warning errors.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of human-based driver support. Nowadays, driver support systems help users to operate safely in many driving situations. Nevertheless, these systems do not fully use the rich information that is available from sensing the human driver. In this paper, we therefore present a human-based risk model that uses driver information for improved driver support. In contrast to state of the art, our proposed risk model combines a) the current driver perception based on driver errors, such as the driver overlooking another vehicle (i.e., notice error), and b) driver personalization, such as the driver being defensive or confident. In extensive simulations of multiple interactive driving scenarios, we show that our novel human-based risk model achieves earlier warning times and reduced warning errors compared to a baseline risk model not using human driver information.

Related papers

• Reducing Warning Errors in Driver Support with Personalized Risk Maps [1.4230646728710978]
  We propose a warning system that estimates a personalized risk factor for the given driver based on the driver's behavior. The system afterwards is able to adapt the warning signal with personalized Risk Maps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T02:13:40Z)
• Work-in-Progress: Crash Course: Can (Under Attack) Autonomous Driving Beat Human Drivers? [60.51287814584477]
  This paper evaluates the inherent risks in autonomous driving by examining the current landscape of AVs. We develop specific claims highlighting the delicate balance between the advantages of AVs and potential security challenges in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T09:42:21Z)
• Context-Aware Quantitative Risk Assessment Machine Learning Model for Drivers Distraction [0.0]
  Multi-Class Driver Distraction Risk Assessment (MDDRA) model considers the vehicle, driver, and environmental data during a journey. MDDRA categorises the driver on a risk matrix as safe, careless, or dangerous. We apply machine learning techniques to classify and predict driver distraction according to severity levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T23:20:36Z)
• RACER: Rational Artificial Intelligence Car-following-model Enhanced by Reality [51.244807332133696]
  This paper introduces RACER, a cutting-edge deep learning car-following model to predict Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) driving behavior. Unlike conventional models, RACER effectively integrates Rational Driving Constraints (RDCs), crucial tenets of actual driving. RACER excels across key metrics, such as acceleration, velocity, and spacing, registering zero violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T06:21:30Z)
• When Authentication Is Not Enough: On the Security of Behavioral-Based Driver Authentication Systems [53.2306792009435]
  We develop two lightweight driver authentication systems based on Random Forest and Recurrent Neural Network architectures. We are the first to propose attacks against these systems by developing two novel evasion attacks, SMARTCAN and GANCAN. Through our contributions, we aid practitioners in safely adopting these systems, help reduce car thefts, and enhance driver security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T14:33:26Z)
• Considering Human Factors in Risk Maps for Robust and Foresighted Driver Warning [1.4699455652461728]
  We propose a warning system that uses human states in the form of driver errors. The system consists of a behavior planner Risk Maps which directly changes its prediction of the surrounding driving situation. In different simulations of a dynamic lane change and intersection scenarios, we show how the driver's behavior plan can become unsafe.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T16:39:58Z)
• FBLNet: FeedBack Loop Network for Driver Attention Prediction [75.83518507463226]
  Nonobjective driving experience is difficult to model. In this paper, we propose a FeedBack Loop Network (FBLNet) which attempts to model the driving experience accumulation procedure. Under the guidance of the incremental knowledge, our model fuses the CNN feature and Transformer feature that are extracted from the input image to predict driver attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T08:25:09Z)
• COOPERNAUT: End-to-End Driving with Cooperative Perception for Networked Vehicles [54.61668577827041]
  We introduce COOPERNAUT, an end-to-end learning model that uses cross-vehicle perception for vision-based cooperative driving. Our experiments on AutoCastSim suggest that our cooperative perception driving models lead to a 40% improvement in average success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T17:55:12Z)
• Learning Accurate and Human-Like Driving using Semantic Maps and Attention [152.48143666881418]
  This paper investigates how end-to-end driving models can be improved to drive more accurately and human-like. We exploit semantic and visual maps from HERE Technologies and augment the existing Drive360 dataset with such. Our models are trained and evaluated on the Drive360 + HERE dataset, which features 60 hours and 3000 km of real-world driving data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-10T22:25:27Z)
• Who Make Drivers Stop? Towards Driver-centric Risk Assessment: Risk Object Identification via Causal Inference [19.71459945458985]
  We propose a driver-centric definition of risk, i.e., objects influencing drivers' behavior are risky. We present a novel two-stage risk object identification framework based on causal inference with the proposed object-level manipulable driving model. Our framework achieves a substantial average performance boost over a strong baseline by 7.5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-05T04:14:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.