Value Functions are Control Barrier Functions: Verification of Safe Policies using Control Theory

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04026v4
• Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:47:31 GMT
• Title: Value Functions are Control Barrier Functions: Verification of Safe Policies using Control Theory
• Authors: Daniel C.H. Tan and Fernando Acero and Robert McCarthy and Dimitrios Kanoulas and Zhibin Li
• Abstract summary: We propose a new approach to apply verification methods from control theory to learned value functions. We formalize original theorems that establish links between value functions and control barrier functions. Our work marks a significant step towards a formal framework for the general, scalable, and verifiable design of RL-based control systems.
• Score: 46.85103495283037
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Guaranteeing safe behaviour of reinforcement learning (RL) policies poses significant challenges for safety-critical applications, despite RL's generality and scalability. To address this, we propose a new approach to apply verification methods from control theory to learned value functions. By analyzing task structures for safety preservation, we formalize original theorems that establish links between value functions and control barrier functions. Further, we propose novel metrics for verifying value functions in safe control tasks and practical implementation details to improve learning. Our work presents a novel method for certificate learning, which unlocks a diversity of verification techniques from control theory for RL policies, and marks a significant step towards a formal framework for the general, scalable, and verifiable design of RL-based control systems. Code and videos are available at this https url: https://rl-cbf.github.io/

Related papers

• Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Control Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems [2.126171264016785]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a powerful method for controlling dynamic systems, but its learning mechanism can lead to unpredictable actions that undermine the safety of critical systems. We propose Adaptive Control Regularization (RL-ACR), an algorithm that enables safe RL exploration by combining the RL policy with a policy regularizer that hard-codes safety constraints. In a series of critical control applications, we demonstrate that RL-ACR ensures safety during training while achieving the performance standards of model-free RL approaches that disregard safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T16:35:14Z)
• Approximate Model-Based Shielding for Safe Reinforcement Learning [83.55437924143615]
  We propose a principled look-ahead shielding algorithm for verifying the performance of learned RL policies. Our algorithm differs from other shielding approaches in that it does not require prior knowledge of the safety-relevant dynamics of the system. We demonstrate superior performance to other safety-aware approaches on a set of Atari games with state-dependent safety-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T15:19:45Z)
• Recursively Feasible Probabilistic Safe Online Learning with Control Barrier Functions [63.18590014127461]
  This paper introduces a model-uncertainty-aware reformulation of CBF-based safety-critical controllers. We study the feasibility of the resulting robust safety-critical controller. We then use these conditions to devise an event-triggered online data collection strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-23T05:02:09Z)
• Joint Differentiable Optimization and Verification for Certified Reinforcement Learning [91.93635157885055]
  In model-based reinforcement learning for safety-critical control systems, it is important to formally certify system properties. We propose a framework that jointly conducts reinforcement learning and formal verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T16:53:56Z)
• Joint Synthesis of Safety Certificate and Safe Control Policy using Constrained Reinforcement Learning [7.658716383823426]
  A valid safety certificate is an energy function indicating that safe states are with low energy. Existing learning-based studies treat the safety certificate and the safe control policy as prior knowledge to learn the other. This paper proposes a novel approach that simultaneously synthesizes the energy-function-based safety certificate and learns the safe control policy with CRL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T12:05:44Z)
• Safe RAN control: A Symbolic Reinforcement Learning Approach [62.997667081978825]
  We present a Symbolic Reinforcement Learning (SRL) based architecture for safety control of Radio Access Network (RAN) applications. We provide a purely automated procedure in which a user can specify high-level logical safety specifications for a given cellular network topology. We introduce a user interface (UI) developed to help a user set intent specifications to the system, and inspect the difference in agent proposed actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T16:45:40Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Robust Action Governor [6.833157102376731]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) is essentially a trial-and-error learning procedure which may cause unsafe behavior during the exploration-and-exploitation process. In this paper, we introduce a framework for safe RL that is based on integration of an RL algorithm with an add-on safety supervision module. We illustrate this proposed safe RL framework through an application to automotive adaptive cruise control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-21T16:50:17Z)
• Certified Reinforcement Learning with Logic Guidance [78.2286146954051]
  We propose a model-free RL algorithm that enables the use of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) to formulate a goal for unknown continuous-state/action Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) The algorithm is guaranteed to synthesise a control policy whose traces satisfy the specification with maximal probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-02-02T20:09:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.