Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15199v3
• Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 12:44:50 GMT
• Title: Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems
• Authors: Haozhe Tian, Homayoun Hamedmoghadam, Robert Shorten, Pietro Ferraro,
• Abstract summary: We propose Adaptive Regularization (RL-AR), an algorithm that enables safe RL exploration. RL-AR performs policy combination via a "focus module," which determines the appropriate combination depending on the state. In a series of critical control applications, we demonstrate that RL-AR not only ensures safety during training but also achieves a return competitive with the standards of model-free RL.
• Score: 2.126171264016785
• License:
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a powerful method for controlling dynamic systems, but its learning mechanism can lead to unpredictable actions that undermine the safety of critical systems. Here, we propose RL with Adaptive Regularization (RL-AR), an algorithm that enables safe RL exploration by combining the RL policy with a policy regularizer that hard-codes the safety constraints. RL-AR performs policy combination via a "focus module," which determines the appropriate combination depending on the state--relying more on the safe policy regularizer for less-exploited states while allowing unbiased convergence for well-exploited states. In a series of critical control applications, we demonstrate that RL-AR not only ensures safety during training but also achieves a return competitive with the standards of model-free RL that disregards safety.

Related papers

• Sampling-based Safe Reinforcement Learning for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems [15.863561935347692]
  We develop provably safe and convergent reinforcement learning algorithms for control of nonlinear dynamical systems. Recent advances at the intersection of control and RL follow a two-stage, safety filter approach to enforcing hard safety constraints. We develop a single-stage, sampling-based approach to hard constraint satisfaction that learns RL controllers enjoying classical convergence guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T19:39:20Z)
• Approximate Model-Based Shielding for Safe Reinforcement Learning [83.55437924143615]
  We propose a principled look-ahead shielding algorithm for verifying the performance of learned RL policies. Our algorithm differs from other shielding approaches in that it does not require prior knowledge of the safety-relevant dynamics of the system. We demonstrate superior performance to other safety-aware approaches on a set of Atari games with state-dependent safety-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T15:19:45Z)
• Safety Correction from Baseline: Towards the Risk-aware Policy in Robotics via Dual-agent Reinforcement Learning [64.11013095004786]
  We propose a dual-agent safe reinforcement learning strategy consisting of a baseline and a safe agent. Such a decoupled framework enables high flexibility, data efficiency and risk-awareness for RL-based control. The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art safe RL algorithms on difficult robot locomotion and manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T03:11:25Z)
• Safe Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with an Uncertainty-Aware Reachability Certificate [6.581362609037603]
  We build a safe reinforcement learning framework to resolve constraints required by the DRC and its corresponding shield policy. We also devise a line search method to maintain safety and reach higher returns simultaneously while leveraging the shield policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T06:16:53Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning via Confidence-Based Filters [78.39359694273575]
  We develop a control-theoretic approach for certifying state safety constraints for nominal policies learned via standard reinforcement learning techniques. We provide formal safety guarantees, and empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T11:43:23Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Robust Action Governor [6.833157102376731]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) is essentially a trial-and-error learning procedure which may cause unsafe behavior during the exploration-and-exploitation process. In this paper, we introduce a framework for safe RL that is based on integration of an RL algorithm with an add-on safety supervision module. We illustrate this proposed safe RL framework through an application to automotive adaptive cruise control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-21T16:50:17Z)
• Closing the Closed-Loop Distribution Shift in Safe Imitation Learning [80.05727171757454]
  We treat safe optimization-based control strategies as experts in an imitation learning problem. We train a learned policy that can be cheaply evaluated at run-time and that provably satisfies the same safety guarantees as the expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-18T05:11:41Z)
• Cautious Reinforcement Learning with Logical Constraints [78.96597639789279]
  An adaptive safe padding forces Reinforcement Learning (RL) to synthesise optimal control policies while ensuring safety during the learning process. Theoretical guarantees are available on the optimality of the synthesised policies and on the convergence of the learning algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T00:01:08Z)
• Guided Constrained Policy Optimization for Dynamic Quadrupedal Robot Locomotion [78.46388769788405]
  We introduce guided constrained policy optimization (GCPO), an RL framework based upon our implementation of constrained policy optimization (CPPO) We show that guided constrained RL offers faster convergence close to the desired optimum resulting in an optimal, yet physically feasible, robotic control behavior without the need for precise reward function tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-22T10:15:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.