A Perspective Study on Chinese Social Media regarding LLM for Education and Beyond
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04325v4
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 17:25:30 GMT
- Title: A Perspective Study on Chinese Social Media regarding LLM for Education and Beyond
- Authors: Yao Tian, Chengwei Tong, Lik-Hang Lee, Reza Hadi Mogavi, Yong Liao, Pengyuan Zhou,
- Abstract summary: This study uses ChatGPT, currently the most powerful and popular AI tool, as a representative example to analyze how the Chinese public perceives the potential of large language models (LLMs) for educational and general purposes.
The study also serves as the first effort to investigate the changes in public opinion as AI technologies become more advanced and intelligent.
- Score: 12.935870689618202
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The application of AI-powered tools has piqued the interest of many fields, particularly in the academic community. This study uses ChatGPT, currently the most powerful and popular AI tool, as a representative example to analyze how the Chinese public perceives the potential of large language models (LLMs) for educational and general purposes. Although facing accessibility challenges, we found that the number of discussions on ChatGPT per month is 16 times that of Ernie Bot developed by Baidu, the most popular alternative product to ChatGPT in the mainland, making ChatGPT a more suitable subject for our analysis. The study also serves as the first effort to investigate the changes in public opinion as AI technologies become more advanced and intelligent. The analysis reveals that, upon first encounters with advanced AI that was not yet highly capable, some social media users believed that AI advancements would benefit education and society, while others feared that advanced AI, like ChatGPT, would make humans feel inferior and lead to problems such as cheating and a decline in moral principles. The majority of users remained neutral. Interestingly, with the rapid development and improvement of AI capabilities, public attitudes have tended to shift in a positive direction. We present a thorough analysis of the trending shift and a roadmap to ensure the ethical application of ChatGPT-like models in education and beyond.
Related papers
- Developing generative AI chatbots conceptual framework for higher education [0.0]
This study aims to comprehend the implications of AIgeneratives on higher education and pinpoint critical elements for their efficacious implementation.
The results demonstrate how much AI chatbots can do to improve student engagement, streamline the educational process, and support administrative and research duties.
But there are also clear difficulties, such as unfavorable student sentiments, doubts about the veracity of material produced by AI, and unease and nervousness with new technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T10:40:26Z) - Exploring ChatGPT and its Impact on Society [7.652195319352287]
ChatGPT is a large language model that can generate human-like responses in a conversational context.
It has the potential to revolutionize various industries and transform the way we interact with technology.
However, the use of ChatGPT has also raised several concerns, including ethical, social, and employment challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T16:44:35Z) - AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities.
The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z) - Exploring User Perspectives on ChatGPT: Applications, Perceptions, and
Implications for AI-Integrated Education [40.38809129759498]
ChatGPT is most commonly used in the domains of higher education, K-12 education, and practical skills training.
On one hand, some users view it as a transformative tool capable of amplifying student self-efficacy and learning motivation.
On the other hand, there is a degree of apprehension among concerned users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T15:13:14Z) - Public Perception of Generative AI on Twitter: An Empirical Study Based
on Occupation and Usage [7.18819534653348]
This paper investigates users' perceptions of generative AI using 3M posts on Twitter from January 2019 to March 2023.
We find that people across various occupations, not just IT-related ones, show a strong interest in generative AI.
After the release of ChatGPT, people's interest in AI in general has increased dramatically.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-16T15:30:12Z) - ChatGPT: Vision and Challenges [1.0591256138276635]
ChatGPT has become a prominent AI language model.
This article investigates into the background and development of the technology behind it, as well as its popular applications.
We speculate on the future of ChatGPT by considering various possibilities for study and development, such as energy-efficiency, cybersecurity, enhancing its applicability to additional technologies (Robotics and Computer Vision), strengthening human-AI communications, and bridging the technological gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-08T14:54:44Z) - Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time.
We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups.
If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z) - One Small Step for Generative AI, One Giant Leap for AGI: A Complete
Survey on ChatGPT in AIGC Era [95.2284704286191]
GPT-4 (a.k.a. ChatGPT plus) is one small step for generative AI (GAI) but one giant leap for artificial general intelligence (AGI)
Since its official release in November 2022, ChatGPT has quickly attracted numerous users with extensive media coverage.
This work is the first to survey ChatGPT with a comprehensive review of its underlying technology, applications, and challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-04T06:22:09Z) - A Complete Survey on Generative AI (AIGC): Is ChatGPT from GPT-4 to
GPT-5 All You Need? [112.12974778019304]
generative AI (AIGC, a.k.a AI-generated content) has made headlines everywhere because of its ability to analyze and create text, images, and beyond.
In the era of AI transitioning from pure analysis to creation, it is worth noting that ChatGPT, with its most recent language model GPT-4, is just a tool out of numerous AIGC tasks.
This work focuses on the technological development of various AIGC tasks based on their output type, including text, images, videos, 3D content, etc.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-21T10:09:47Z) - Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being.
For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.