Problematic Advertising and its Disparate Exposure on Facebook

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06052v1
• Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 17:23:59 GMT
• Title: Problematic Advertising and its Disparate Exposure on Facebook
• Authors: Muhammad Ali, Angelica Goetzen, Alan Mislove, Elissa M. Redmiles, Piotr Sapiezynski
• Abstract summary: We study Facebook and investigate key gaps in our understanding of problematic online advertising. We find that older people and minority groups are especially likely to be shown such ads. Given that 22% of problematic ads had no specific targeting from advertisers, we infer that ad delivery algorithms played a significant role in the biased distribution of these ads.
• Score: 15.667983888666312
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Targeted advertising remains an important part of the free web browsing experience, where advertisers' targeting and personalization algorithms together find the most relevant audience for millions of ads every day. However, given the wide use of advertising, this also enables using ads as a vehicle for problematic content, such as scams or clickbait. Recent work that explores people's sentiments toward online ads, and the impacts of these ads on people's online experiences, has found evidence that online ads can indeed be problematic. Further, there is the potential for personalization to aid the delivery of such ads, even when the advertiser targets with low specificity. In this paper, we study Facebook -- one of the internet's largest ad platforms -- and investigate key gaps in our understanding of problematic online advertising: (a) What categories of ads do people find problematic? (b) Are there disparities in the distribution of problematic ads to viewers? and if so, (c) Who is responsible -- advertisers or advertising platforms? To answer these questions, we empirically measure a diverse sample of user experiences with Facebook ads via a 3-month longitudinal panel. We categorize over 32,000 ads collected from this panel ($n=132$); and survey participants' sentiments toward their own ads to identify four categories of problematic ads. Statistically modeling the distribution of problematic ads across demographics, we find that older people and minority groups are especially likely to be shown such ads. Further, given that 22% of problematic ads had no specific targeting from advertisers, we infer that ad delivery algorithms (advertising platforms themselves) played a significant role in the biased distribution of these ads.

Related papers

• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Long-Term Ad Memorability: Understanding & Generating Memorable Ads [54.23854539909078]
  There has been no large-scale study on the memorability of ads. We release the first memorability dataset, LAMBDA, consisting of 1749 participants and 2205 ads covering 276 brands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T10:27:04Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads [70.02478301291264]
  We develop a new methodology for black-box auditing of algorithms for discrimination in the delivery of job advertisements. Our first contribution is to identify the distinction between skew in ad delivery due to protected categories such as gender or race. Second, we develop an auditing methodology that distinguishes between skew explainable by differences in qualifications from other factors. Third, we apply our proposed methodology to two prominent targeted advertising platforms for job ads: Facebook and LinkedIn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T17:38:36Z)
• Understanding the Complexity of Detecting Political Ads [0.9391375268580806]
  We take an empirical approach to analyze what kind of ads are deemed political by ordinary people and what kind of ads lead to disagreement. Our results imply that it is important to consider social issue ads as political, but they also complicate political advertising regulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T07:44:08Z)
• How Much Ad Viewability is Enough? The Effect of Display Ad Viewability on Advertising Effectiveness [0.0]
  We analyze a large-scale observational data set with more than 350,000 ad impressions. Long exposure durations and 100% visible pixels do not appear to be optimal in generating view-throughs. Highest view-through rates seem to be generated with relatively lower pixel/second-combinations of 50%/1, 50%/5, 75%/1, and 75%/5.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-26T05:49:57Z)
• An Empirical Study of In-App Advertising Issues Based on Large Scale App Review Analysis [67.58267006314415]
  We present a large-scale analysis on ad-related user feedback from App Store and Google Play. From a statistical analysis of 36,309 ad-related reviews, we find that users care most about the number of unique ads and ad display frequency during usage. Some ad issue types are addressed more quickly by developers than other ad issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-22T05:38:24Z)
• Do Interruptions Pay Off? Effects of Interruptive Ads on Consumers Willingness to Pay [79.9312329825761]
  We present the results of a study designed to measure the impact of interruptive advertising on consumers willingness to pay for products bearing the advertiser's brand. Our results contribute to the research on the economic impact of advertising, and introduce a method of measuring actual (as opposed to self-reported) willingness to pay in experimental marketing research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-14T09:26:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.