On Identifiability of Conditional Causal Effects
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11755v1
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 14:38:06 GMT
- Title: On Identifiability of Conditional Causal Effects
- Authors: Yaroslav Kivva, Jalal Etesami, Negar Kiyavash
- Abstract summary: We address the problem of identifiability of an arbitrary conditional causal effect given both the causal graph and a set of any observational and/or interventional distributions of the form $Q[S]:=P(S|do(Vsetminus S))$.
We call this problem conditional generalized identifiability (c-gID in short) and prove the completeness of Pearl's $do$-calculus for the c-gID problem.
- Score: 24.95216517499459
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We address the problem of identifiability of an arbitrary conditional causal
effect given both the causal graph and a set of any observational and/or
interventional distributions of the form $Q[S]:=P(S|do(V\setminus S))$, where
$V$ denotes the set of all observed variables and $S\subseteq V$. We call this
problem conditional generalized identifiability (c-gID in short) and prove the
completeness of Pearl's $do$-calculus for the c-gID problem by providing sound
and complete algorithm for the c-gID problem. This work revisited the c-gID
problem in Lee et al. [2020], Correa et al. [2021] by adding explicitly the
positivity assumption which is crucial for identifiability. It extends the
results of [Lee et al., 2019, Kivva et al., 2022] on general identifiability
(gID) which studied the problem for unconditional causal effects and Shpitser
and Pearl [2006b] on identifiability of conditional causal effects given merely
the observational distribution $P(\mathbf{V})$ as our algorithm generalizes the
algorithms proposed in [Kivva et al., 2022] and [Shpitser and Pearl, 2006b].
Related papers
- DeCaFlow: A Deconfounding Causal Generative Model [58.411886466157185]
Causal generative models (CGMs) have recently emerged as capable approaches to simulate the causal mechanisms generating our observations.
We introduce DeCaFlow, a CGM that accounts for hidden confounders in a single amortized training process using only observational data and the causal graph.
For the first time to our knowledge, we show that a confounded counterfactual query is identifiable, and thus solvable by DeCaFlow.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-19T11:14:16Z) - Causal Effect Identification in a Sub-Population with Latent Variables [22.75558589075695]
The s-ID problem seeks to compute a causal effect in a specific sub-population from the observational data pertaining to the same sub population.
In this paper, we consider an extension of the s-ID problem that allows for the presence of latent variables.
We propose a sound algorithm for the s-ID problem with latent variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T13:25:41Z) - Matching the Statistical Query Lower Bound for k-sparse Parity Problems with Stochastic Gradient Descent [83.85536329832722]
We show that gradient descent (SGD) can efficiently solve the $k$-parity problem on a $d$dimensional hypercube.
We then demonstrate how a trained neural network with SGD, solving the $k$-parity problem with small statistical errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-18T17:57:53Z) - Distribution-Independent Regression for Generalized Linear Models with
Oblivious Corruptions [49.69852011882769]
We show the first algorithms for the problem of regression for generalized linear models (GLMs) in the presence of additive oblivious noise.
We present an algorithm that tackles newthis problem in its most general distribution-independent setting.
This is the first newalgorithmic result for GLM regression newwith oblivious noise which can handle more than half the samples being arbitrarily corrupted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-20T21:41:59Z) - Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown
Interventions [63.1354734978244]
We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables.
Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z) - Detection-Recovery Gap for Planted Dense Cycles [72.4451045270967]
We consider a model where a dense cycle with expected bandwidth $n tau$ and edge density $p$ is planted in an ErdHos-R'enyi graph $G(n,q)$.
We characterize the computational thresholds for the associated detection and recovery problems for the class of low-degree algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-13T22:51:07Z) - On the Identifiability and Estimation of Causal Location-Scale Noise
Models [122.65417012597754]
We study the class of location-scale or heteroscedastic noise models (LSNMs)
We show the causal direction is identifiable up to some pathological cases.
We propose two estimators for LSNMs: an estimator based on (non-linear) feature maps, and one based on neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-13T17:18:59Z) - Causal Effect Identification in Uncertain Causal Networks [30.239874638041904]
Causal identification is at the core of the causal inference literature.
We show that the edges in a causal graph exist with uncertainties which may, for example, represent degree of belief from domain experts.
We propose efficient algorithms to approximate this problem evaluate them against both real-world networks and randomly generated graphs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-09T09:44:45Z) - Revisiting the General Identifiability Problem [22.201414668050123]
We revisit the problem of general identifiability originally introduced in [Lee et al., 2019] for causal inference.
We show that without such an assumption the rules of do-calculus and consequently the proposed algorithm in [Lee et al., 2019] are not sound.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-02T15:07:25Z) - Effect Identification in Cluster Causal Diagrams [51.42809552422494]
We introduce a new type of graphical model called cluster causal diagrams (for short, C-DAGs)
C-DAGs allow for the partial specification of relationships among variables based on limited prior knowledge.
We develop the foundations and machinery for valid causal inferences over C-DAGs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-22T21:27:31Z) - Algorithmic Causal Effect Identification with causaleffect [0.0]
This report is to review and implement in Python some algorithms to compute conditional and non-conditional causal queries from observational data.
We first present some basic background knowledge on probability and graph theory, before introducing important results on causal theory.
We then thoroughly study the identification algorithms presented by Shpitser and Pearl in 2006, explaining our implementation in Python alongside.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-09T19:00:33Z) - From Checking to Inference: Actual Causality Computations as
Optimization Problems [79.87179017975235]
We present a novel approach to formulate different notions of causal reasoning, over binary acyclic models, as optimization problems.
We show that both notions are efficiently automated. Using models with more than $8000$ variables, checking is computed in a matter of seconds, with MaxSAT outperforming ILP in many cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-05T10:56:52Z) - Locally Private Hypothesis Selection [96.06118559817057]
We output a distribution from $mathcalQ$ whose total variation distance to $p$ is comparable to the best such distribution.
We show that the constraint of local differential privacy incurs an exponential increase in cost.
Our algorithms result in exponential improvements on the round complexity of previous methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-21T18:30:48Z) - Learning and Sampling of Atomic Interventions from Observations [11.522442415989818]
We study the problem of efficiently estimating the effect of an intervention on a single variable (atomic interventions) using observational samples in a causal Bayesian network.
Our goal is to give algorithms that are efficient in both time and sample complexity in a non-parametric setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-11T07:15:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.