Visualizing Relation Between (De)Motivating Topics and Public Stance toward COVID-19 Vaccine

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12118v2
• Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 15:11:20 GMT
• Title: Visualizing Relation Between (De)Motivating Topics and Public Stance toward COVID-19 Vaccine
• Authors: Ashiqur Rahman and Hamed Alhoori
• Abstract summary: In this study, we proposed an interactive visualization tool to inspect and analyze the topics that resonated among Twitter-sphere during the COVID-19 pandemic. This tool can easily be generalized for any scenario for visual analysis and to increase the transparency of social media data for researchers and the general population alike.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: While social media plays a vital role in communication nowadays, misinformation and trolls can easily take over the conversation and steer public opinion on these platforms. We saw the effect of misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic when public health officials faced significant push-back while trying to motivate the public to vaccinate. To tackle the current and any future threats in emergencies and motivate the public towards a common goal, it is essential to understand how public motivation shifts and which topics resonate among the general population. In this study, we proposed an interactive visualization tool to inspect and analyze the topics that resonated among Twitter-sphere during the COVID-19 pandemic and understand the key factors that shifted public stance for vaccination. This tool can easily be generalized for any scenario for visual analysis and to increase the transparency of social media data for researchers and the general population alike.

Related papers

• Cutting through the noise to motivate people: A comprehensive analysis of COVID-19 social media posts de/motivating vaccination [1.1606619391009658]
  The COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant weaknesses in the healthcare information system. The overwhelming volume of misinformation on social media created challenges to motivate people to take proper precautions and get vaccinated. This study addresses scientific communication and public motivation in social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-15T02:36:11Z)
• Large language models for sentiment analysis of newspaper articles during COVID-19: The Guardian [0.16777183511743468]
  This study provides a sentiment analysis of The Guardian newspaper during various stages of COVID-19. During the early pandemic stages, public sentiment prioritised urgent crisis response, later shifting focus to addressing the impact on health and the economy. Results indicate that during the early pandemic stages, public sentiment prioritised urgent crisis response, later shifting focus to addressing the impact on health and the economy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T07:10:52Z)
• Event Detection from Social Media for Epidemic Prediction [76.90779562626541]
  We develop a framework to extract and analyze epidemic-related events from social media posts. Experimentation reveals how ED models trained on COVID-based SPEED can effectively detect epidemic events for three unseen epidemics. We show that reporting sharp increases in the extracted events by our framework can provide warnings 4-9 weeks earlier than the WHO epidemic declaration for Monkeypox.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T06:31:17Z)
• Cross-Platform Social Dynamics: An Analysis of ChatGPT and COVID-19 Vaccine Conversations [37.69303106863453]
  We analyzed over 12 million posts and news articles related to two significant events: the release of ChatGPT in 2022 and the global discussions about COVID-19 vaccines in 2021. Data was collected from multiple platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, YouTube, and GDELT. We employed topic modeling techniques to uncover the distinct thematic emphases on each platform, which reflect their specific features and target audiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T09:58:55Z)
• Exploring celebrity influence on public attitude towards the COVID-19 pandemic: social media shared sentiment analysis [0.7340017786387767]
  People have turned to social media networks to share sentiments related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined the role of social messaging shared by Persons in the Public Eye in determining overall public discourse direction. Our findings suggest the presence of consistent patterns of emotional content co-occurring with messaging shared by Persons in the Public Eye.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T21:56:50Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• COVID-19 and Big Data: Multi-faceted Analysis for Spatio-temporal Understanding of the Pandemic with Social Media Conversations [4.07452542897703]
  Social media platforms have served as a vehicle for the global conversation about COVID-19. We present a framework for analysis, mining, and tracking the critical content and characteristics of social media conversations around the pandemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-22T00:45:50Z)
• Dark Web Marketplaces and COVID-19: before the vaccine [53.447910186085586]
  We analyse 851,199 listings extracted from 30 dark web marketplaces between January 1, 2020 and November 16, 2020. We identify 788 listings directly related to COVID-19 products and monitor the temporal evolution of product categories. We reveal how the online shadow economy has evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight the importance of a continuous monitoring of DWMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T14:27:41Z)
• The Ivory Tower Lost: How College Students Respond Differently than the General Public to the COVID-19 Pandemic [66.80677233314002]
  Pandemic of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented governments with ultimate challenges. In the United States, the country with the highest confirmed COVID-19 infection cases, a nationwide social distancing protocol has been implemented by the President. This paper aims to discover the social implications of this unprecedented disruption in our interactive society by mining people's opinions on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T13:02:38Z)
• Falling into the Echo Chamber: the Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter [65.7192861893042]
  We examine the extent to which the vaccination debate on Twitter is conductive to potential outreach to the vaccination hesitant. We discover that the vaccination skeptics, as well as the advocates, reside in their own distinct "echo chambers" At the center of these echo chambers we find the ardent supporters, for which we build highly accurate network- and content-based classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.