Highly engaging events reveal semantic and temporal compression in online community discourse

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.14735v2
• Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 13:04:37 GMT
• Title: Highly engaging events reveal semantic and temporal compression in online community discourse
• Authors: Antonio Desiderio, Anna Mancini, Giulio Cimini, Riccardo Di Clemente,
• Abstract summary: We leverage Reddit conversation data, exploiting its community-based structure, to elucidate how offline events influence online user interactions and behavior. Online conversations become repetitive with a more limited vocabulary, develop at a faster pace and feature heightened emotions. Users become more active and they exchange information with a growing audience, despite using a less rich vocabulary and repetitive messages.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: People nowadays express their opinions in online spaces, using different forms of interactions such as posting, sharing and discussing with one another. How do these digital traces change in response to events happening in the real world? We leverage Reddit conversation data, exploiting its community-based structure, to elucidate how offline events influence online user interactions and behavior. Online conversations, as posts and comments, are analysed along their temporal and semantic dimensions. Conversations tend to become repetitive with a more limited vocabulary, develop at a faster pace and feature heightened emotions. As the event approaches, the shifts occurring in conversations are reflected in the users' dynamics. Users become more active and they exchange information with a growing audience, despite using a less rich vocabulary and repetitive messages. The recurring patterns we discovered are persistent across a wide range of events and several contexts, representing a fingerprint of how online dynamics change in response to real-world occurrences.

Related papers

• Inside the echo chamber: Linguistic underpinnings of misinformation on Twitter [4.62503518282081]
  Social media users drive the spread of misinformation online by sharing posts that include erroneous information or commenting on controversial topics. This work explores how conversations around misinformation are mediated through language use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T15:37:12Z)
• A Longitudinal Study of Italian and French Reddit Conversations Around the Russian Invasion of Ukraine [1.002138130221506]
  This study delves into the conversations within the largest Italian and French Reddit communities, specifically examining how the Russian invasion of Ukraine affected online interactions. We use a dataset with over 3 million posts (i.e., comments and submissions) to describe the patterns of moderation activity. We found changes in moderators' behavior, who became more active during the first month of the war.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T16:15:52Z)
• Dynamic Causal Disentanglement Model for Dialogue Emotion Detection [77.96255121683011]
  We propose a Dynamic Causal Disentanglement Model based on hidden variable separation. This model effectively decomposes the content of dialogues and investigates the temporal accumulation of emotions. Specifically, we propose a dynamic temporal disentanglement model to infer the propagation of utterances and hidden variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T12:58:09Z)
• Using Semantic Similarity and Text Embedding to Measure the Social Media Echo of Strategic Communications [0.0]
  We use a set of press releases from environmental organisations and tweets from the climate change debate to show that our novel approach reveals a heavy-tailed distribution of response in online discourse to strategic communications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T13:46:07Z)
• AI Chat Assistants can Improve Conversations about Divisive Topics [3.8583005413310625]
  We present results of a large-scale experiment that demonstrates how online conversations can be improved with artificial intelligence tools. We employ a large language model to make real-time, evidence-based recommendations intended to improve participants' perception of feeling understood in conversations. We find that these interventions improve the reported quality of the conversation, reduce political divisiveness, and improve the tone, without systematically changing the content of the conversation or moving people's policy attitudes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T06:42:09Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)
• Understanding How People Rate Their Conversations [73.17730062864314]
  We conduct a study to better understand how people rate their interactions with conversational agents. We focus on agreeableness and extraversion as variables that may explain variation in ratings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T00:45:32Z)
• SSAGCN: Social Soft Attention Graph Convolution Network for Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction [59.064925464991056]
  We propose one new prediction model named Social Soft Attention Graph Convolution Network (SSAGCN) SSAGCN aims to simultaneously handle social interactions among pedestrians and scene interactions between pedestrians and environments. Experiments on public available datasets prove the effectiveness of SSAGCN and have achieved state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-05T01:49:18Z)
• Who Responded to Whom: The Joint Effects of Latent Topics and Discourse in Conversation Structure [53.77234444565652]
  We identify the responding relations in the conversation discourse, which link response utterances to their initiations. We propose a model to learn latent topics and discourse in word distributions, and predict pairwise initiation-response links. Experimental results on both English and Chinese conversations show that our model significantly outperforms the previous state of the arts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T17:46:00Z)
• Linking the Dynamics of User Stance to the Structure of Online Discussions [6.853826783413853]
  We investigate whether users' stance concerning contentious subjects is influenced by the online discussions they are exposed to. We set up a series of predictive exercises based on machine learning models. We find that the most informative features relate to the stance composition of the discussion in which users prefer to engage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-25T02:08:54Z)
• Generating Dialogue Responses from a Semantic Latent Space [75.18449428414736]
  We propose an alternative to the end-to-end classification on vocabulary. We learn the pair relationship between the prompts and responses as a regression task on a latent space. Human evaluation showed that learning the task on a continuous space can generate responses that are both relevant and informative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T19:06:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.