The Future of AI-Assisted Writing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16641v1
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 02:46:45 GMT
- Title: The Future of AI-Assisted Writing
- Authors: Carlos Alves Pereira, Tanay Komarlu, and Wael Mobeirek
- Abstract summary: We conduct a comparative user-study between such tools from an information retrieval lens: pull and push.
Our findings show that users welcome seamless assistance of AI in their writing.
Users also enjoyed the collaboration with AI-assisted writing tools and did not feel a lack of ownership.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The development of Natural Language Generation models has led to the creation
of powerful Artificial Intelligence-assisted writing tools. These tools are
capable of predicting users' needs and actively providing suggestions as they
write. In this work, we conduct a comparative user-study between such tools
from an information retrieval lens: pull and push. Specifically, we investigate
the user demand of AI-assisted writing, the impact of the two paradigms on
quality, ownership of the writing product, and efficiency and enjoyment of the
writing process. We also seek to understand the impact of bias of AI-assisted
writing. Our findings show that users welcome seamless assistance of AI in
their writing. Furthermore, AI helped users to diversify the ideas in their
writing while keeping it clear and concise more quickly. Users also enjoyed the
collaboration with AI-assisted writing tools and did not feel a lack of
ownership. Finally, although participants did not experience bias in our
experiments, they still expressed explicit and clear concerns that should be
addressed in future AI-assisted writing tools.
Related papers
- "It was 80% me, 20% AI": Seeking Authenticity in Co-Writing with Large Language Models [97.22914355737676]
We examine whether and how writers want to preserve their authentic voice when co-writing with AI tools.
Our findings illuminate conceptions of authenticity in human-AI co-creation.
Readers' responses showed less concern about human-AI co-writing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-20T04:42:32Z) - The Dearth of the Author in AI-Supported Writing [2.113447936889669]
We argue that the dearth of the author helps to explain a number of recurring difficulties and anxieties around AI-based writing support tools.
It also suggests an ambitious new goal for AI-based writing support tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-16T05:23:03Z) - Perceptions and Detection of AI Use in Manuscript Preparation for
Academic Journals [1.881901067333374]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have produced both excitement and worry about how AI will impact academic writing.
Authors of academic publications may decide to voluntarily disclose any AI tools they use to revise their manuscripts.
journals and conferences could begin mandating disclosure and/or turn to using detection services.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-19T06:04:46Z) - PaperCard for Reporting Machine Assistance in Academic Writing [48.33722012818687]
ChatGPT, a question-answering system released by OpenAI in November 2022, has demonstrated a range of capabilities that could be utilised in producing academic papers.
This raises critical questions surrounding the concept of authorship in academia.
We propose a framework we name "PaperCard", a documentation for human authors to transparently declare the use of AI in their writing process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-07T14:28:04Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z) - Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps.
We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches.
We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z) - Creative Writing with an AI-Powered Writing Assistant: Perspectives from
Professional Writers [9.120878749348986]
Natural language generation (NLG) using neural language models has brought us closer than ever to the goal of building AI-powered creative writing tools.
Recent developments in natural language generation using neural language models have brought us closer than ever to the goal of building AI-powered creative writing tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-09T17:00:56Z) - Suggestion Lists vs. Continuous Generation: Interaction Design for
Writing with Generative Models on Mobile Devices Affect Text Length, Wording
and Perceived Authorship [27.853155569154705]
We present two user interfaces for writing with AI on mobile devices, which manipulate levels of initiative and control.
With AI suggestions, people wrote less actively, yet felt they were the author.
In both designs, AI increased text length and was perceived to influence wording.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-01T13:57:11Z) - AI Explainability 360: Impact and Design [120.95633114160688]
In 2019, we created AI Explainability 360 (Arya et al. 2020), an open source software toolkit featuring ten diverse and state-of-the-art explainability methods.
This paper examines the impact of the toolkit with several case studies, statistics, and community feedback.
The paper also describes the flexible design of the toolkit, examples of its use, and the significant educational material and documentation available to its users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-24T19:17:09Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.