End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontiers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16927v3
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 13:55:30 GMT
- Title: End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontiers
- Authors: Li Chen, Penghao Wu, Kashyap Chitta, Bernhard Jaeger, Andreas Geiger, Hongyang Li,
- Abstract summary: We provide a comprehensive analysis of more than 270 papers, covering the motivation, roadmap, methodology, challenges, and future trends in end-to-end autonomous driving.
We delve into several critical challenges, including multi-modality, interpretability, causal confusion, robustness, and world models, amongst others.
We discuss current advancements in foundation models and visual pre-training, as well as how to incorporate these techniques within the end-to-end driving framework.
- Score: 45.391430626264764
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: The autonomous driving community has witnessed a rapid growth in approaches that embrace an end-to-end algorithm framework, utilizing raw sensor input to generate vehicle motion plans, instead of concentrating on individual tasks such as detection and motion prediction. End-to-end systems, in comparison to modular pipelines, benefit from joint feature optimization for perception and planning. This field has flourished due to the availability of large-scale datasets, closed-loop evaluation, and the increasing need for autonomous driving algorithms to perform effectively in challenging scenarios. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive analysis of more than 270 papers, covering the motivation, roadmap, methodology, challenges, and future trends in end-to-end autonomous driving. We delve into several critical challenges, including multi-modality, interpretability, causal confusion, robustness, and world models, amongst others. Additionally, we discuss current advancements in foundation models and visual pre-training, as well as how to incorporate these techniques within the end-to-end driving framework. we maintain an active repository that contains up-to-date literature and open-source projects at https://github.com/OpenDriveLab/End-to-end-Autonomous-Driving.
Related papers
- DiFSD: Ego-Centric Fully Sparse Paradigm with Uncertainty Denoising and Iterative Refinement for Efficient End-to-End Self-Driving [55.53171248839489]
We propose an ego-centric fully sparse paradigm, named DiFSD, for end-to-end self-driving.
Specifically, DiFSD mainly consists of sparse perception, hierarchical interaction and iterative motion planner.
Experiments conducted on nuScenes and Bench2Drive datasets demonstrate the superior planning performance and great efficiency of DiFSD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-15T15:55:24Z) - Exploring the Causality of End-to-End Autonomous Driving [57.631400236930375]
We propose a comprehensive approach to explore and analyze the causality of end-to-end autonomous driving.
Our work is the first to unveil the mystery of end-to-end autonomous driving and turn the black box into a white one.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T04:56:11Z) - Enhancing End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Latent World Model [78.22157677787239]
We propose a novel self-supervised method to enhance end-to-end driving without the need for costly labels.
Our framework textbfLAW uses a LAtent World model to predict future latent features based on the predicted ego actions and the latent feature of the current frame.
As a result, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in both open-loop and closed-loop benchmarks without costly annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-12T17:59:21Z) - DriveCoT: Integrating Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with End-to-End Driving [81.04174379726251]
This paper collects a comprehensive end-to-end driving dataset named DriveCoT.
It contains sensor data, control decisions, and chain-of-thought labels to indicate the reasoning process.
We propose a baseline model called DriveCoT-Agent, trained on our dataset, to generate chain-of-thought predictions and final decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-25T17:59:01Z) - Reason2Drive: Towards Interpretable and Chain-based Reasoning for Autonomous Driving [38.28159034562901]
Reason2Drive is a benchmark dataset with over 600K video-text pairs.
We characterize the autonomous driving process as a sequential combination of perception, prediction, and reasoning steps.
We introduce a novel aggregated evaluation metric to assess chain-based reasoning performance in autonomous systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-06T18:32:33Z) - Drive Anywhere: Generalizable End-to-end Autonomous Driving with
Multi-modal Foundation Models [114.69732301904419]
We present an approach to apply end-to-end open-set (any environment/scene) autonomous driving that is capable of providing driving decisions from representations queryable by image and text.
Our approach demonstrates unparalleled results in diverse tests while achieving significantly greater robustness in out-of-distribution situations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:56:35Z) - The Integration of Prediction and Planning in Deep Learning Automated Driving Systems: A Review [43.30610493968783]
We review state-of-the-art deep learning-based planning systems, and focus on how they integrate prediction.
We discuss the implications, strengths, and limitations of different integration principles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-10T17:53:03Z) - Recent Advancements in End-to-End Autonomous Driving using Deep
Learning: A Survey [9.385936248154987]
End-to-End driving is a promising paradigm as it circumvents the drawbacks associated with modular systems.
Recent developments in End-to-End autonomous driving are analyzed, and research is categorized based on underlying principles.
This paper assesses the state-of-the-art, identifies challenges, and explores future possibilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-10T07:00:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.