The Integration of Prediction and Planning in Deep Learning Automated Driving Systems: A Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05731v3
• Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:11:01 GMT
• Title: The Integration of Prediction and Planning in Deep Learning Automated Driving Systems: A Review
• Authors: Steffen Hagedorn, Marcel Hallgarten, Martin Stoll, Alexandru Condurache,
• Abstract summary: We review state-of-the-art deep learning-based planning systems, and focus on how they integrate prediction. We discuss the implications, strengths, and limitations of different integration principles.
• Score: 43.30610493968783
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Automated driving has the potential to revolutionize personal, public, and freight mobility. Beside accurately perceiving the environment, automated vehicles must plan a safe, comfortable, and efficient motion trajectory. To promote safety and progress, many works rely on modules that predict the future motion of surrounding traffic. Modular automated driving systems commonly handle prediction and planning as sequential, separate tasks. While this accounts for the influence of surrounding traffic on the ego vehicle, it fails to anticipate the reactions of traffic participants to the ego vehicle's behavior. Recent methods increasingly integrate prediction and planning in a joint or interdependent step to model bidirectional interactions. To date, a comprehensive overview of different integration principles is lacking. We systematically review state-of-the-art deep learning-based planning systems, and focus on how they integrate prediction. Different facets of the integration ranging from system architecture to high-level behavioral aspects are considered and related to each other. Moreover, we discuss the implications, strengths, and limitations of different integration principles. By pointing out research gaps, describing relevant future challenges, and highlighting trends in the research field, we identify promising directions for future research.

Related papers

• PPAD: Iterative Interactions of Prediction and Planning for End-to-end Autonomous Driving [57.89801036693292]
  PPAD (Iterative Interaction of Prediction and Planning Autonomous Driving) considers the timestep-wise interaction to better integrate prediction and planning. We design ego-to-agent, ego-to-map, and ego-to-BEV interaction mechanisms with hierarchical dynamic key objects attention to better model the interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T11:53:24Z)
• Recent Advancements in End-to-End Autonomous Driving using Deep Learning: A Survey [9.385936248154987]
  End-to-End driving is a promising paradigm as it circumvents the drawbacks associated with modular systems. Recent developments in End-to-End autonomous driving are analyzed, and research is categorized based on underlying principles. This paper assesses the state-of-the-art, identifies challenges, and explores future possibilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T07:00:06Z)
• End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontiers [45.391430626264764]
  We provide a comprehensive analysis of more than 270 papers, covering the motivation, roadmap, methodology, challenges, and future trends in end-to-end autonomous driving. We delve into several critical challenges, including multi-modality, interpretability, causal confusion, robustness, and world models, amongst others. We discuss current advancements in foundation models and visual pre-training, as well as how to incorporate these techniques within the end-to-end driving framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T14:17:24Z)
• Deep Structured Reactive Planning [94.92994828905984]
  We propose a novel data-driven, reactive planning objective for self-driving vehicles. We show that our model outperforms a non-reactive variant in successfully completing highly complex maneuvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T01:43:36Z)
• What-If Motion Prediction for Autonomous Driving [58.338520347197765]
  Viable solutions must account for both the static geometric context, such as road lanes, and dynamic social interactions arising from multiple actors. We propose a recurrent graph-based attentional approach with interpretable geometric (actor-lane) and social (actor-actor) relationships. Our model can produce diverse predictions conditioned on hypothetical or "what-if" road lanes and multi-actor interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T17:49:30Z)
• The Importance of Prior Knowledge in Precise Multimodal Prediction [71.74884391209955]
  Roads have well defined geometries, topologies, and traffic rules. In this paper we propose to incorporate structured priors as a loss function. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on real-world self-driving datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T03:56:11Z)
• PiP: Planning-informed Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Driving [69.41885900996589]
  We propose planning-informed trajectory prediction (PiP) to tackle the prediction problem in the multi-agent setting. By informing the prediction process with the planning of ego vehicle, our method achieves the state-of-the-art performance of multi-agent forecasting on highway datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-25T16:09:54Z)
• Social-WaGDAT: Interaction-aware Trajectory Prediction via Wasserstein Graph Double-Attention Network [29.289670231364788]
  In this paper, we propose a generic generative neural system for multi-agent trajectory prediction. We also employ an efficient kinematic constraint layer applied to vehicle trajectory prediction. The proposed system is evaluated on three public benchmark datasets for trajectory prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-14T20:11:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.