Why are state-space models more expressive than $n$-gram models?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.17184v2
• Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 00:24:59 GMT
• Title: Why are state-space models more expressive than $n$-gram models?
• Authors: Vinoth Nandakumar, Qiang Qu, Peng Mi, Tongliang Liu,
• Abstract summary: We construct state space language models that can solve the next-word prediction task for languages generated from $n$-gram rules. Our proof shows how SSMs can encode $n$-gram rules using new theoretical results on their memorization capacity. We conduct experiments with a small dataset generated from $n$-gram rules to show how our framework can be applied.
• Score: 51.823427608117626
• License:
• Abstract: Recent advancements in recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have reinvigorated interest in their application to natural language processing tasks, particularly with the development of more efficient and parallelizable variants known as state space models (SSMs), which have shown competitive performance against transformer models while maintaining a lower memory footprint. While RNNs and SSMs (e.g., Mamba) have been empirically more successful than rule-based systems based on $n$-gram models, a rigorous theoretical explanation for this success has not yet been developed, as it is unclear how these models encode the combinatorial rules that govern the next-word prediction task. In this paper, we construct state space language models that can solve the next-word prediction task for languages generated from $n$-gram rules, thereby showing that the former are more expressive. Our proof shows how SSMs can encode $n$-gram rules using new theoretical results on their memorization capacity, and demonstrates how their context window can be controlled by restricting the spectrum of the hidden weight matrix. We conduct experiments with a small dataset generated from $n$-gram rules to show how our framework can be applied to SSMs and RNNs obtained through gradient-based optimization.

Related papers

• Implicit Language Models are RNNs: Balancing Parallelization and Expressivity [4.332158627306896]
  State-space models (SSMs) and transformers dominate the language modeling landscape. We propose implicit SSMs, which iterate a transformation until convergence to a fixed point. Our approach demonstrates superior state-tracking capabilities on regular languages, surpassing transformers and SSMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T19:59:31Z)
• Great Memory, Shallow Reasoning: Limits of $k$NN-LMs [71.73611113995143]
  $k$NN-LMs, which integrate retrieval with next-word prediction, have demonstrated strong performance in language modeling. We ask whether this improved ability to recall information really translates into downstream abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T17:59:05Z)
• The Role of $n$-gram Smoothing in the Age of Neural Networks [60.23726773548038]
  This paper re-opens the role classical $n$-gram smoothing techniques may play in the age of neural language models. We derive a framework for converting any $n$-gram smoothing technique into a regularizer compatible with neural language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T22:42:19Z)
• Theoretical Foundations of Deep Selective State-Space Models [13.971499161967083]
  Deep SSMs demonstrate outstanding performance across a diverse set of domains. Recent developments show that if the linear recurrence powering SSMs allows for multiplicative interactions between inputs and hidden states. We show that when random linear recurrences are equipped with simple input-controlled transitions, then the hidden state is provably a low-dimensional projection of a powerful mathematical object.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T11:20:16Z)
• On the Computational Complexity and Formal Hierarchy of Second Order Recurrent Neural Networks [59.85314067235965]
  We extend the theoretical foundation for the $2nd$-order recurrent network ($2nd$ RNN) We prove there exists a class of a $2nd$ RNN that is Turing-complete with bounded time. We also demonstrate that $2$nd order RNNs, without memory, outperform modern-day models such as vanilla RNNs and gated recurrent units in recognizing regular grammars.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-26T06:06:47Z)
• Toward a Theory of Causation for Interpreting Neural Code Models [49.906221295459275]
  This paper introduces $do_code$, a post hoc interpretability method specific to Neural Code Models (NCMs) $do_code$ is based upon causal inference to enable language-oriented explanations. Results show that our studied NCMs are sensitive to changes in code syntax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T22:56:58Z)
• Residual Learning of Neural Text Generation with $n$-gram Language Model [41.26228768053928]
  We learn a neural LM that fits the residual between an $n$-gram LM and the real-data distribution. Our approach attains additional performance gains over popular standalone neural models consistently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T02:42:53Z)
• Recognizing Long Grammatical Sequences Using Recurrent Networks Augmented With An External Differentiable Stack [73.48927855855219]
  Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are a widely used deep architecture for sequence modeling, generation, and prediction. RNNs generalize poorly over very long sequences, which limits their applicability to many important temporal processing and time series forecasting problems. One way to address these shortcomings is to couple an RNN with an external, differentiable memory structure, such as a stack. In this paper, we improve the memory-augmented RNN with important architectural and state updating mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-04T14:19:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.