What is Your Favorite Gender, MLM? Gender Bias Evaluation in Multilingual Masked Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06621v1
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 21:12:08 GMT
- Title: What is Your Favorite Gender, MLM? Gender Bias Evaluation in Multilingual Masked Language Models
- Authors: Jeongrok Yu, Seong Ug Kim, Jacob Choi, Jinho D. Choi,
- Abstract summary: This paper proposes an approach to estimate gender bias in multilingual lexicons from 5 languages: Chinese, English, German, Portuguese, and Spanish.
A novel model-based method is presented to generate sentence pairs for a more robust analysis of gender bias.
Our results suggest that gender bias should be studied on a large dataset using multiple evaluation metrics for best practice.
- Score: 8.618945530676614
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Bias is a disproportionate prejudice in favor of one side against another. Due to the success of transformer-based Masked Language Models (MLMs) and their impact on many NLP tasks, a systematic evaluation of bias in these models is needed more than ever. While many studies have evaluated gender bias in English MLMs, only a few works have been conducted for the task in other languages. This paper proposes a multilingual approach to estimate gender bias in MLMs from 5 languages: Chinese, English, German, Portuguese, and Spanish. Unlike previous work, our approach does not depend on parallel corpora coupled with English to detect gender bias in other languages using multilingual lexicons. Moreover, a novel model-based method is presented to generate sentence pairs for a more robust analysis of gender bias, compared to the traditional lexicon-based method. For each language, both the lexicon-based and model-based methods are applied to create two datasets respectively, which are used to evaluate gender bias in an MLM specifically trained for that language using one existing and 3 new scoring metrics. Our results show that the previous approach is data-sensitive and not stable as it does not remove contextual dependencies irrelevant to gender. In fact, the results often flip when different scoring metrics are used on the same dataset, suggesting that gender bias should be studied on a large dataset using multiple evaluation metrics for best practice.
Related papers
- Beyond Binary Gender: Evaluating Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous Attitude Words [85.48043537327258]
Existing machine translation gender bias evaluations are primarily focused on male and female genders.
This study presents a benchmark AmbGIMT (Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous attitude words)
We propose a novel process to evaluate gender bias based on the Emotional Attitude Score (EAS), which is used to quantify ambiguous attitude words.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T08:13:51Z) - GenderBias-\emph{VL}: Benchmarking Gender Bias in Vision Language Models via Counterfactual Probing [72.0343083866144]
This paper introduces the GenderBias-emphVL benchmark to evaluate occupation-related gender bias in Large Vision-Language Models.
Using our benchmark, we extensively evaluate 15 commonly used open-source LVLMs and state-of-the-art commercial APIs.
Our findings reveal widespread gender biases in existing LVLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-30T05:55:15Z) - Gender Bias in Large Language Models across Multiple Languages [10.068466432117113]
We examine gender bias in large language models (LLMs) generated for different languages.
We use three measurements: 1) gender bias in selecting descriptive words given the gender-related context.
2) gender bias in selecting gender-related pronouns (she/he) given the descriptive words.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-01T04:47:16Z) - Multilingual Text-to-Image Generation Magnifies Gender Stereotypes and Prompt Engineering May Not Help You [64.74707085021858]
We show that multilingual models suffer from significant gender biases just as monolingual models do.
We propose a novel benchmark, MAGBIG, intended to foster research on gender bias in multilingual models.
Our results show that not only do models exhibit strong gender biases but they also behave differently across languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T12:02:28Z) - Probing Explicit and Implicit Gender Bias through LLM Conditional Text
Generation [64.79319733514266]
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate biased and toxic responses.
We propose a conditional text generation mechanism without the need for predefined gender phrases and stereotypes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-01T05:31:46Z) - Target-Agnostic Gender-Aware Contrastive Learning for Mitigating Bias in
Multilingual Machine Translation [28.471506840241602]
Gender bias is a significant issue in machine translation, leading to ongoing research efforts in developing bias mitigation techniques.
We propose a bias mitigation method based on a novel approach.
Gender-Aware Contrastive Learning, GACL, encodes contextual gender information into the representations of non-explicit gender words.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T12:53:39Z) - Efficient Gender Debiasing of Pre-trained Indic Language Models [0.0]
The gender bias present in the data on which language models are pre-trained gets reflected in the systems that use these models.
In our paper, we measure gender bias associated with occupations in Hindi language models.
Our results reflect that the bias is reduced post-introduction of our proposed mitigation techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-08T09:15:58Z) - Gender Bias in Masked Language Models for Multiple Languages [31.528949172210233]
We propose Bias Evaluation (MBE) score, to evaluate bias in various languages using only English attribute word lists and parallel corpora.
We evaluate bias in eight languages using the MBE and confirmed that gender-related biases are encoded in attribute words for all those languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-01T20:19:14Z) - Unmasking Contextual Stereotypes: Measuring and Mitigating BERT's Gender
Bias [12.4543414590979]
Contextualized word embeddings have been replacing standard embeddings in NLP systems.
We measure gender bias by studying associations between gender-denoting target words and names of professions in English and German.
We show that our method of measuring bias is appropriate for languages with a rich and gender-marking, such as German.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-27T18:06:09Z) - Gender Bias in Multilingual Embeddings and Cross-Lingual Transfer [101.58431011820755]
We study gender bias in multilingual embeddings and how it affects transfer learning for NLP applications.
We create a multilingual dataset for bias analysis and propose several ways for quantifying bias in multilingual representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-02T04:34:37Z) - Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text.
We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions.
Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.