Detecting LLM-Generated Text in Computing Education: A Comparative Study for ChatGPT Cases

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07411v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 12:18:34 GMT
• Title: Detecting LLM-Generated Text in Computing Education: A Comparative Study for ChatGPT Cases
• Authors: Michael Sheinman Orenstrakh, Oscar Karnalim, Carlos Anibal Suarez, Michael Liut
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have posed a serious threat to academic integrity in education. Modern detectors are still in need of improvements so that they can offer a full-proof solution to help maintain academic integrity.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Due to the recent improvements and wide availability of Large Language Models (LLMs), they have posed a serious threat to academic integrity in education. Modern LLM-generated text detectors attempt to combat the problem by offering educators with services to assess whether some text is LLM-generated. In this work, we have collected 124 submissions from computer science students before the creation of ChatGPT. We then generated 40 ChatGPT submissions. We used this data to evaluate eight publicly-available LLM-generated text detectors through the measures of accuracy, false positives, and resilience. The purpose of this work is to inform the community of what LLM-generated text detectors work and which do not, but also to provide insights for educators to better maintain academic integrity in their courses. Our results find that CopyLeaks is the most accurate LLM-generated text detector, GPTKit is the best LLM-generated text detector to reduce false positives, and GLTR is the most resilient LLM-generated text detector. We also express concerns over 52 false positives (of 114 human written submissions) generated by GPTZero. Finally, we note that all LLM-generated text detectors are less accurate with code, other languages (aside from English), and after the use of paraphrasing tools (like QuillBot). Modern detectors are still in need of improvements so that they can offer a full-proof solution to help maintain academic integrity. Further, their usability can be improved by facilitating a smooth API integration, providing clear documentation of their features and the understandability of their model(s), and supporting more commonly used languages.

Related papers

• ReMoDetect: Reward Models Recognize Aligned LLM's Generations [55.06804460642062]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate human-preferable texts. We propose two training schemes to further improve the detection ability of the reward model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T17:38:33Z)
• Unsupervised Information Refinement Training of Large Language Models for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [128.01050030936028]
  We propose an information refinement training method named InFO-RAG. InFO-RAG is low-cost and general across various tasks. It improves the performance of LLaMA2 by an average of 9.39% relative points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T08:24:38Z)
• Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text [98.28130949052313]
  A score based on contrasting two closely related language models is highly accurate at separating human-generated and machine-generated text. We propose a novel LLM detector that only requires simple calculations using a pair of pre-trained LLMs. The method, called Binoculars, achieves state-of-the-art accuracy without any training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T16:09:47Z)
• LLatrieval: LLM-Verified Retrieval for Verifiable Generation [67.93134176912477]
  Verifiable generation aims to let the large language model (LLM) generate text with supporting documents. We propose LLatrieval (Large Language Model Verified Retrieval), where the LLM updates the retrieval result until it verifies that the retrieved documents can sufficiently support answering the question. Experiments show that LLatrieval significantly outperforms extensive baselines and achieves state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T01:38:02Z)
• A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions [39.36381851190369]
  There is an imperative need to develop detectors that can detect LLM-generated text. This is crucial to mitigate potential misuse of LLMs and safeguard realms like artistic expression and social networks from harmful influence of LLM-generated content. The detector techniques have witnessed notable advancements recently, propelled by innovations in watermarking techniques, statistics-based detectors, neural-base detectors, and human-assisted methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T09:01:13Z)
• Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Models [114.36392560711022]
  Large language models (LLMs) present significant safety and ethical risks if exploited by malicious users. Recent works have proposed algorithms to detect LLM-generated text and protect LLMs. We study two types of attack strategies: 1) replacing certain words in an LLM's output with their synonyms given the context; 2) automatically searching for an instructional prompt to alter the writing style of the generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T10:08:37Z)
• LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection Tool [119.0952092533317]
  Large language models (LLMs) are remarkably close to high-quality human-authored text. Existing detection tools can only differentiate between machine-generated and human-authored text. We propose LLMDet, a model-specific, secure, efficient, and extendable detection tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.