LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection
Tool
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15004v3
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 14:31:09 GMT
- Title: LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection
Tool
- Authors: Kangxi Wu, Liang Pang, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng and Tat-Seng Chua
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are remarkably close to high-quality human-authored text.
Existing detection tools can only differentiate between machine-generated and human-authored text.
We propose LLMDet, a model-specific, secure, efficient, and extendable detection tool.
- Score: 119.0952092533317
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Generated texts from large language models (LLMs) are remarkably close to
high-quality human-authored text, raising concerns about their potential misuse
in spreading false information and academic misconduct. Consequently, there is
an urgent need for a highly practical detection tool capable of accurately
identifying the source of a given text. However, existing detection tools
typically rely on access to LLMs and can only differentiate between
machine-generated and human-authored text, failing to meet the requirements of
fine-grained tracing, intermediary judgment, and rapid detection. Therefore, we
propose LLMDet, a model-specific, secure, efficient, and extendable detection
tool, that can source text from specific LLMs, such as GPT-2, OPT, LLaMA, and
others. In LLMDet, we record the next-token probabilities of salient n-grams as
features to calculate proxy perplexity for each LLM. By jointly analyzing the
proxy perplexities of LLMs, we can determine the source of the generated text.
Experimental results show that LLMDet yields impressive detection performance
while ensuring speed and security, achieving 98.54% precision and x5.0 faster
for recognizing human-authored text. Additionally, LLMDet can effortlessly
extend its detection capabilities to a new open-source model. We will provide
an open-source tool at https://github.com/TrustedLLM/LLMDet.
Related papers
- DetectRL: Benchmarking LLM-Generated Text Detection in Real-World Scenarios [38.952481877244644]
We present a new benchmark, DetectRL, highlighting that even state-of-the-art (SOTA) detection techniques still underperformed in this task.
Our development of DetectRL reveals the strengths and limitations of current SOTA detectors.
We believe DetectRL could serve as an effective benchmark for assessing detectors in real-world scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T09:01:25Z) - GigaCheck: Detecting LLM-generated Content [72.27323884094953]
In this work, we investigate the task of generated text detection by proposing the GigaCheck.
Our research explores two approaches: (i) distinguishing human-written texts from LLM-generated ones, and (ii) detecting LLM-generated intervals in Human-Machine collaborative texts.
Specifically, we use a fine-tuned general-purpose LLM in conjunction with a DETR-like detection model, adapted from computer vision, to localize artificially generated intervals within text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T08:30:55Z) - Unveiling Large Language Models Generated Texts: A Multi-Level Fine-Grained Detection Framework [9.976099891796784]
Large language models (LLMs) have transformed human writing by enhancing grammar correction, content expansion, and stylistic refinement.
Existing detection methods, which mainly rely on single-feature analysis and binary classification, often fail to effectively identify LLM-generated text in academic contexts.
We propose a novel Multi-level Fine-grained Detection framework that detects LLM-generated text by integrating low-level structural, high-level semantic, and deep-level linguistic features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T07:25:00Z) - SPOT: Text Source Prediction from Originality Score Thresholding [6.790905400046194]
countermeasures aim at detecting misinformation, usually involve domain specific models trained to recognize the relevance of any information.
Instead of evaluating the validity of the information, we propose to investigate LLM generated text from the perspective of trust.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T21:51:01Z) - ReMoDetect: Reward Models Recognize Aligned LLM's Generations [55.06804460642062]
Large language models (LLMs) generate human-preferable texts.
In this paper, we identify the common characteristics shared by these models.
We propose two training schemes to further improve the detection ability of the reward model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T17:38:33Z) - Who Wrote This? The Key to Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Text Detection Is GECScore [51.65730053591696]
We propose a simple but effective black-box zero-shot detection approach.
It is predicated on the observation that human-written texts typically contain more grammatical errors than LLM-generated texts.
Our method achieves an average AUROC of 98.7% and shows strong robustness against paraphrase and adversarial perturbation attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-07T12:57:01Z) - LLM-Detector: Improving AI-Generated Chinese Text Detection with
Open-Source LLM Instruction Tuning [4.328134379418151]
Existing AI-generated text detection models are prone to in-domain over-fitting.
We propose LLM-Detector, a novel method for both document-level and sentence-level text detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T05:54:12Z) - A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions [39.36381851190369]
There is an imperative need to develop detectors that can detect LLM-generated text.
This is crucial to mitigate potential misuse of LLMs and safeguard realms like artistic expression and social networks from harmful influence of LLM-generated content.
The detector techniques have witnessed notable advancements recently, propelled by innovations in watermarking techniques, statistics-based detectors, neural-base detectors, and human-assisted methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T09:01:13Z) - Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Models [114.36392560711022]
Large language models (LLMs) present significant safety and ethical risks if exploited by malicious users.
Recent works have proposed algorithms to detect LLM-generated text and protect LLMs.
We study two types of attack strategies: 1) replacing certain words in an LLM's output with their synonyms given the context; 2) automatically searching for an instructional prompt to alter the writing style of the generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T10:08:37Z) - MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild [82.70561073277801]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved human-level text generation, emphasizing the need for effective AI-generated text detection.
We build a comprehensive testbed by gathering texts from diverse human writings and texts generated by different LLMs.
Despite challenges, the top-performing detector can identify 86.54% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T17:13:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.