Causing is Achieving -- A solution to the problem of causation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07517v1
• Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2023 09:01:49 GMT
• Title: Causing is Achieving -- A solution to the problem of causation
• Authors: Riichiro Mizoguchi
• Abstract summary: The problem of understanding and modeling causation has been recently challenged on the premise that causation is real. The essence of causation lies in a single function, namely Achieves. It remains to elucidate the nature of the Achieves function, which has been elaborated only partially in the previous work.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: From the standpoint of applied ontology, the problem of understanding and modeling causation has been recently challenged on the premise that causation is real. As a consequence, the following three results were obtained: (1) causation can be understood via the notion of systemic function; (2) any cause can be decomposed using only four subfunctions, namely Achieves, Prevents, Allows, and Disallows; and (3) the last three subfunctions can be defined in terms of Achieves alone. It follows that the essence of causation lies in a single function, namely Achieves. It remains to elucidate the nature of the Achieves function, which has been elaborated only partially in the previous work. In this paper, we first discuss a couple of underlying policies in the above-mentioned causal theory since these are useful in the discussion, then summarize the results obtained in the former paper, and finally reveal the nature of Achieves giving a complete solution to the problem of what causation is.

Related papers

• The Odyssey of Commonsense Causality: From Foundational Benchmarks to Cutting-Edge Reasoning [70.16523526957162]
  Understanding commonsense causality helps people understand the principles of the real world better. Despite its significance, a systematic exploration of this topic is notably lacking. Our work aims to provide a systematic overview, update scholars on recent advancements, and provide a pragmatic guide for beginners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T16:30:50Z)
• Emergence and Causality in Complex Systems: A Survey on Causal Emergence and Related Quantitative Studies [12.78006421209864]
  Causal emergence theory employs measures of causality to quantify emergence. Two key problems are addressed: quantifying causal emergence and identifying it in data. We highlighted that the architectures used for identifying causal emergence are shared by causal representation learning, causal model abstraction, and world model-based reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T04:20:46Z)
• A Survey on Causal Discovery: Theory and Practice [2.741266294612776]
  Causal inference is designed to quantify the underlying relationships that connect a cause to its effect. In this paper, we explore recent advancements in a unified manner, provide a consistent overview of existing algorithms, report useful tools and data, present real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T08:18:56Z)
• Reasoning about Causality in Games [63.930126666879396]
  Causal reasoning and game-theoretic reasoning are fundamental topics in artificial intelligence. We introduce mechanised games, which encode dependencies between agents' decision rules and the distributions governing the game. We describe correspondences between causal games and other formalisms, and explain how causal games can be used to answer queries that other causal or game-theoretic models do not support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T22:47:28Z)
• Phenomenological Causality [14.817342045377842]
  We propose a notion of 'phenomenological causality' whose basic concept is a set of elementary actions. We argue that it is consistent with the causal Markov condition when the system under consideration interacts with other variables that control the elementary actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T13:05:45Z)
• Active Bayesian Causal Inference [72.70593653185078]
  We propose Active Bayesian Causal Inference (ABCI), a fully-Bayesian active learning framework for integrated causal discovery and reasoning. ABCI jointly infers a posterior over causal models and queries of interest. We show that our approach is more data-efficient than several baselines that only focus on learning the full causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T22:38:57Z)
• Causality, Causal Discovery, and Causal Inference in Structural Engineering [1.827510863075184]
  This paper builds a case for causal discovery and causal inference from a civil and structural engineering perspective. More specifically, this paper outlines the key principles of causality and the most commonly used algorithms and packages for causal discovery and causal inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-04T14:49:47Z)
• Towards Causal Representation Learning [96.110881654479]
  The two fields of machine learning and graphical causality arose and developed separately. There is now cross-pollination and increasing interest in both fields to benefit from the advances of the other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T15:26:57Z)
• The Counterfactual NESS Definition of Causation [3.198144010381572]
  I show that our definition is in fact a formalization of Wright's famous NESS definition of causation combined with a counterfactual difference-making condition. I modify our definition to offer a substantial improvement: I weaken the difference-making condition in such a way that it avoids the problematic analysis of cases of preemption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-09T15:57:56Z)
• Thinking About Causation: A Causal Language with Epistemic Operators [58.720142291102135]
  We extend the notion of a causal model with a representation of the state of an agent. On the side of the object language, we add operators to express knowledge and the act of observing new information. We provide a sound and complete axiomatization of the logic, and discuss the relation of this framework to causal team semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T12:16:45Z)
• Aligning Faithful Interpretations with their Social Attribution [58.13152510843004]
  We find that the requirement of model interpretations to be faithful is vague and incomplete. We identify that the problem is a misalignment between the causal chain of decisions (causal attribution) and the attribution of human behavior to the interpretation (social attribution)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-01T16:45:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.