Combining model-predictive control and predictive reinforcement learning for stable quadrupedal robot locomotion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07752v1
• Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 09:22:37 GMT
• Title: Combining model-predictive control and predictive reinforcement learning for stable quadrupedal robot locomotion
• Authors: Vyacheslav Kovalev, Anna Shkromada, Henni Ouerdane and Pavel Osinenko
• Abstract summary: We study how this can be achieved by a combination of model-predictive and predictive reinforcement learning controllers. In this work, we combine both control methods to address the quadrupedal robot stable gate generation problem.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Stable gait generation is a crucial problem for legged robot locomotion as this impacts other critical performance factors such as, e.g. mobility over an uneven terrain and power consumption. Gait generation stability results from the efficient control of the interaction between the legged robot's body and the environment where it moves. Here, we study how this can be achieved by a combination of model-predictive and predictive reinforcement learning controllers. Model-predictive control (MPC) is a well-established method that does not utilize any online learning (except for some adaptive variations) as it provides a convenient interface for state constraints management. Reinforcement learning (RL), in contrast, relies on adaptation based on pure experience. In its bare-bone variants, RL is not always suitable for robots due to their high complexity and expensive simulation/experimentation. In this work, we combine both control methods to address the quadrupedal robot stable gate generation problem. The hybrid approach that we develop and apply uses a cost roll-out algorithm with a tail cost in the form of a Q-function modeled by a neural network; this allows to alleviate the computational complexity, which grows exponentially with the prediction horizon in a purely MPC approach. We demonstrate that our RL gait controller achieves stable locomotion at short horizons, where a nominal MP controller fails. Further, our controller is capable of live operation, meaning that it does not require previous training. Our results suggest that the hybridization of MPC with RL, as presented here, is beneficial to achieve a good balance between online control capabilities and computational complexity.

Related papers

• Autotuning Bipedal Locomotion MPC with GRFM-Net for Efficient Sim-to-Real Transfer [10.52309107195141]
  We address the challenges of parameter selection in bipedal locomotion control using DiffTune. A major difficulty lies in balancing model fidelity with differentiability. We validate the parameters learned by DiffTune with GRFM-Net in hardware experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T03:58:18Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Versatile, Dynamic, and Robust Bipedal Locomotion Control [106.32794844077534]
  This paper presents a study on using deep reinforcement learning to create dynamic locomotion controllers for bipedal robots. We develop a general control solution that can be used for a range of dynamic bipedal skills, from periodic walking and running to aperiodic jumping and standing. This work pushes the limits of agility for bipedal robots through extensive real-world experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T10:48:43Z)
• SERL: A Software Suite for Sample-Efficient Robotic Reinforcement Learning [85.21378553454672]
  We develop a library containing a sample efficient off-policy deep RL method, together with methods for computing rewards and resetting the environment. We find that our implementation can achieve very efficient learning, acquiring policies for PCB board assembly, cable routing, and object relocation. These policies achieve perfect or near-perfect success rates, extreme robustness even under perturbations, and exhibit emergent robustness recovery and correction behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T10:01:10Z)
• Reaching the Limit in Autonomous Racing: Optimal Control versus Reinforcement Learning [66.10854214036605]
  A central question in robotics is how to design a control system for an agile mobile robot. We show that a neural network controller trained with reinforcement learning (RL) outperformed optimal control (OC) methods in this setting. Our findings allowed us to push an agile drone to its maximum performance, achieving a peak acceleration greater than 12 times the gravitational acceleration and a peak velocity of 108 kilometers per hour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T02:40:27Z)
• A Real-World Quadrupedal Locomotion Benchmark for Offline Reinforcement Learning [27.00483962026472]
  We benchmark 11 offline reinforcement learning algorithms in realistic quadrupedal locomotion dataset. Experiments show that the best-performing ORL algorithms can achieve competitive performance compared with the model-free RL. Our proposed benchmark will serve as a development platform for testing and evaluating the performance of ORL algorithms in real-world legged locomotion tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T13:18:29Z)
• RL + Model-based Control: Using On-demand Optimal Control to Learn Versatile Legged Locomotion [16.800984476447624]
  This paper presents a control framework that combines model-based optimal control and reinforcement learning. We validate the robustness and controllability of the framework through a series of experiments. Our framework effortlessly supports the training of control policies for robots with diverse dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T01:33:55Z)
• Learning Bipedal Walking for Humanoids with Current Feedback [5.429166905724048]
  We present an approach for overcoming the sim2real gap issue for humanoid robots arising from inaccurate torque-tracking at the actuator level. Our approach successfully trains a unified, end-to-end policy in simulation that can be deployed on a real HRP-5P humanoid robot to achieve bipedal locomotion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T08:16:46Z)
• Bayesian Optimization Meets Hybrid Zero Dynamics: Safe Parameter Learning for Bipedal Locomotion Control [17.37169551675587]
  We propose a multi-domain control parameter learning framework for locomotion control of bipedal robots. We leverage BO to learn the control parameters used in the HZD-based controller. Next, the learning process is applied on the physical robot to learn for corrections to the control parameters learned in simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-04T20:48:17Z)
• OSCAR: Data-Driven Operational Space Control for Adaptive and Robust Robot Manipulation [50.59541802645156]
  Operational Space Control (OSC) has been used as an effective task-space controller for manipulation. We propose OSC for Adaptation and Robustness (OSCAR), a data-driven variant of OSC that compensates for modeling errors. We evaluate our method on a variety of simulated manipulation problems, and find substantial improvements over an array of controller baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-02T01:21:38Z)
• Learning a Contact-Adaptive Controller for Robust, Efficient Legged Locomotion [95.1825179206694]
  We present a framework that synthesizes robust controllers for a quadruped robot. A high-level controller learns to choose from a set of primitives in response to changes in the environment. A low-level controller that utilizes an established control method to robustly execute the primitives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-21T16:49:26Z)
• Improving Input-Output Linearizing Controllers for Bipedal Robots via Reinforcement Learning [85.13138591433635]
  The main drawbacks of input-output linearizing controllers are the need for precise dynamics models and not being able to account for input constraints. In this paper, we address both challenges for the specific case of bipedal robot control by the use of reinforcement learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T18:15:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.