Enhancing conversational quality in language learning chatbots: An evaluation of GPT4 for ASR error correction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09744v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 04:25:21 GMT
• Title: Enhancing conversational quality in language learning chatbots: An evaluation of GPT4 for ASR error correction
• Authors: Long Mai and Julie Carson-Berndsen
• Abstract summary: This paper explores the use of GPT4 for ASR error correction in conversational settings. We find that transcriptions corrected by GPT4 lead to higher conversation quality, despite an increase in WER.
• Score: 20.465220855548292
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The integration of natural language processing (NLP) technologies into educational applications has shown promising results, particularly in the language learning domain. Recently, many spoken open-domain chatbots have been used as speaking partners, helping language learners improve their language skills. However, one of the significant challenges is the high word-error-rate (WER) when recognizing non-native/non-fluent speech, which interrupts conversation flow and leads to disappointment for learners. This paper explores the use of GPT4 for ASR error correction in conversational settings. In addition to WER, we propose to use semantic textual similarity (STS) and next response sensibility (NRS) metrics to evaluate the impact of error correction models on the quality of the conversation. We find that transcriptions corrected by GPT4 lead to higher conversation quality, despite an increase in WER. GPT4 also outperforms standard error correction methods without the need for in-domain training data.

Related papers

• Can LLMs Understand the Implication of Emphasized Sentences in Dialogue? [64.72966061510375]
  Emphasis is a crucial component in human communication, which indicates the speaker's intention and implication beyond pure text in dialogue. This paper introduces Emphasized-Talk, a benchmark with emphasis-annotated dialogue samples capturing the implications of emphasis. We evaluate various Large Language Models (LLMs), both open-source and commercial, to measure their performance in understanding emphasis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T20:41:44Z)
• GPT-3.5 for Grammatical Error Correction [0.4757470449749875]
  This paper investigates the application of GPT-3.5 for Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) in multiple languages. We conduct automatic evaluations of the corrections proposed by GPT-3.5 using several methods. For English, GPT-3.5 demonstrates high recall, generates fluent corrections, and generally preserves sentence semantics. But, human evaluation for both English and Russian reveals that, despite its strong error-detection capabilities, GPT-3.5 struggles with several error types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T09:51:09Z)
• Generative error correction for code-switching speech recognition using large language models [49.06203730433107]
  Code-switching (CS) speech refers to the phenomenon of mixing two or more languages within the same sentence. We propose to leverage large language models (LLMs) and lists of hypotheses generated by an ASR to address the CS problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T14:49:48Z)
• ChatGPT-4 as a Tool for Reviewing Academic Books in Spanish [1.0052074659955383]
  ChatGPT-4 is an artificial intelligence language model developed by OpenAI. This study evaluates the potential of ChatGPT-4 as an editing tool for Spanish literary and academic books.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T11:44:45Z)
• Does Correction Remain A Problem For Large Language Models? [63.24433996856764]
  This paper investigates the role of correction in the context of large language models by conducting two experiments. The first experiment focuses on correction as a standalone task, employing few-shot learning techniques with GPT-like models for error correction. The second experiment explores the notion of correction as a preparatory task for other NLP tasks, examining whether large language models can tolerate and perform adequately on texts containing certain levels of noise or errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T14:09:31Z)
• DisfluencyFixer: A tool to enhance Language Learning through Speech To Speech Disfluency Correction [50.51901599433536]
  DisfluencyFixer is a tool that performs speech-to-speech disfluency correction in English and Hindi. Our proposed system removes disfluencies from input speech and returns fluent speech as output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T14:13:38Z)
• Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluation [41.94480044074273]
  ChatGPT is a large-scale language model based on the advanced GPT-3.5 architecture. We design zero-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) and few-shot CoT settings using in-context learning for ChatGPT. Our evaluation involves assessing ChatGPT's performance on five official test sets in three different languages, along with three document-level GEC test sets in English.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T12:33:40Z)
• Few-Shot Cross-Lingual TTS Using Transferable Phoneme Embedding [55.989376102986654]
  This paper studies a transferable phoneme embedding framework that aims to deal with the cross-lingual text-to-speech problem under the few-shot setting. We propose a framework that consists of a phoneme-based TTS model and a codebook module to project phonemes from different languages into a learned latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T11:24:40Z)
• Learning not to Discriminate: Task Agnostic Learning for Improving Monolingual and Code-switched Speech Recognition [12.354292498112347]
  We present further improvements over our previous work by using domain adversarial learning to train task models. Our proposed technique leads to reductions in Word Error Rates (WER) in monolingual and code-switched test sets across three language pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-09T13:45:30Z)
• On the Robustness of Language Encoders against Grammatical Errors [66.05648604987479]
  We collect real grammatical errors from non-native speakers and conduct adversarial attacks to simulate these errors on clean text data. Results confirm that the performance of all tested models is affected but the degree of impact varies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-12T11:01:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.